社会幸福感问卷的解释性与验证性因素分析

I. Hekmati, T. Hashemi, S. Vahedi, J. Babapour
{"title":"社会幸福感问卷的解释性与验证性因素分析","authors":"I. Hekmati, T. Hashemi, S. Vahedi, J. Babapour","doi":"10.30491/IJBS.2014.67854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The purpose of present study was to investigate social well-being Questionnaire psychometric properties among university students. Method: To achieve the aim of investigation, undergraduate students among Tabriz University (n=391; 131 male and 260 Female; age Mean= 21.32, SD= 3.12 and 22.42, SD= 2.86 respectively) and Islamic Azad University of Tabriz (n=384; 171 male and 212 Female; age Mean= 21.62, SD= 3.75 and 20.80, SD= 1.49 respectively) were selected by multi-stage cluster sampling and filled Keyes Social Well-being Questionnaire, Memorial University of Newfoundland Scale of Happiness, General Self-efficacy Questionnaire, SCL-90 interpersonal subscale and DASS-42. Results: Explanatory factor analysis showed four factor structure of this questionnaire which could explain 59.70 percent of total variance. Confirmatory factor analysis χ2/df, GFI, AGFI, CFI, AIC and RMSEA indices suggest that five-factor model fit data little more than four-factor model. Also the finding showed social well-being dimensions were positively correlated with happiness and self-efficacy and negatively with difficulties in interpersonal relationship, depression, anxiety and stress. Finally result showed factors Chronbach alpha vary between 0.41 and 0.63 and it was 0.81 for total questionnaire items. Conclusion: Findings corroborate five-factor model of social-well being suggested by Keyes, which imply construct validity of this instrument. Also finding suggest that the social well-being questionnaire has convergent validity and its reliability is good for total but not for factors.","PeriodicalId":31218,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Behavioral Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Explanatory and Confirmatory Factors Analysis of Social Well-being Questionnaire\",\"authors\":\"I. Hekmati, T. Hashemi, S. Vahedi, J. Babapour\",\"doi\":\"10.30491/IJBS.2014.67854\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: The purpose of present study was to investigate social well-being Questionnaire psychometric properties among university students. Method: To achieve the aim of investigation, undergraduate students among Tabriz University (n=391; 131 male and 260 Female; age Mean= 21.32, SD= 3.12 and 22.42, SD= 2.86 respectively) and Islamic Azad University of Tabriz (n=384; 171 male and 212 Female; age Mean= 21.62, SD= 3.75 and 20.80, SD= 1.49 respectively) were selected by multi-stage cluster sampling and filled Keyes Social Well-being Questionnaire, Memorial University of Newfoundland Scale of Happiness, General Self-efficacy Questionnaire, SCL-90 interpersonal subscale and DASS-42. Results: Explanatory factor analysis showed four factor structure of this questionnaire which could explain 59.70 percent of total variance. Confirmatory factor analysis χ2/df, GFI, AGFI, CFI, AIC and RMSEA indices suggest that five-factor model fit data little more than four-factor model. Also the finding showed social well-being dimensions were positively correlated with happiness and self-efficacy and negatively with difficulties in interpersonal relationship, depression, anxiety and stress. Finally result showed factors Chronbach alpha vary between 0.41 and 0.63 and it was 0.81 for total questionnaire items. Conclusion: Findings corroborate five-factor model of social-well being suggested by Keyes, which imply construct validity of this instrument. Also finding suggest that the social well-being questionnaire has convergent validity and its reliability is good for total but not for factors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31218,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Behavioral Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Behavioral Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30491/IJBS.2014.67854\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Behavioral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30491/IJBS.2014.67854","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

前言:本研究旨在探讨大学生社会幸福感问卷的心理测量特征。方法:为达到调查目的,对大不里士大学本科生(n=391;男性131人,女性260人;年龄:平均21.32岁,SD= 3.12; 22.42岁,SD= 2.86),大不里士伊斯兰大学(n=384;男性171人,女性212人;年龄均值为21.62,SD分别为3.75和20.80,SD分别为1.49),采用多阶段整群抽样的方法,填写凯斯社会幸福感问卷、纽芬兰纪念大学幸福量表、一般自我效能感问卷、SCL-90人际关系子量表和DASS-42。结果:经解释因子分析,本问卷具有四因子结构,可解释总方差的59.70%。验证性因子分析χ2/df、GFI、AGFI、CFI、AIC和RMSEA指标表明,五因素模型拟合数据略高于四因素模型。社会幸福感维度与幸福感和自我效能感呈正相关,与人际关系困难、抑郁、焦虑和压力呈负相关。最终结果显示,各因子的Chronbach alpha值在0.41 ~ 0.63之间,总问卷项目的各因子值为0.81。结论:研究结果证实了Keyes提出的社会幸福感五因素模型,表明该工具具有建构效度。社会幸福感问卷具有收敛效度,总体信度较好,而因子信度较差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Explanatory and Confirmatory Factors Analysis of Social Well-being Questionnaire
Introduction: The purpose of present study was to investigate social well-being Questionnaire psychometric properties among university students. Method: To achieve the aim of investigation, undergraduate students among Tabriz University (n=391; 131 male and 260 Female; age Mean= 21.32, SD= 3.12 and 22.42, SD= 2.86 respectively) and Islamic Azad University of Tabriz (n=384; 171 male and 212 Female; age Mean= 21.62, SD= 3.75 and 20.80, SD= 1.49 respectively) were selected by multi-stage cluster sampling and filled Keyes Social Well-being Questionnaire, Memorial University of Newfoundland Scale of Happiness, General Self-efficacy Questionnaire, SCL-90 interpersonal subscale and DASS-42. Results: Explanatory factor analysis showed four factor structure of this questionnaire which could explain 59.70 percent of total variance. Confirmatory factor analysis χ2/df, GFI, AGFI, CFI, AIC and RMSEA indices suggest that five-factor model fit data little more than four-factor model. Also the finding showed social well-being dimensions were positively correlated with happiness and self-efficacy and negatively with difficulties in interpersonal relationship, depression, anxiety and stress. Finally result showed factors Chronbach alpha vary between 0.41 and 0.63 and it was 0.81 for total questionnaire items. Conclusion: Findings corroborate five-factor model of social-well being suggested by Keyes, which imply construct validity of this instrument. Also finding suggest that the social well-being questionnaire has convergent validity and its reliability is good for total but not for factors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Mindfulness-based Group Therapy on Aggression and Resilience of Suburban Children in Mashhad The Relationship between Social Loneliness and Psychological Well-being in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis: The Moderating Role of Self-compassion Boredom Mediates the Relationship between Depression Symptoms and Compulsive Buying Behavior among Female Adolescents Identifying and Codifying the Model of Meaning of Life in the Iranian Elderly: A Qualitative Study The Effectiveness of Mindful Self-compassion Treatment as a Compound Method with Diet Therapy on Body Mass Indexes and the External Shame in Women with High Body Mass Indexes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1