{"title":"政治经济学的创始人","authors":"C. Perrotta","doi":"10.3280/SPE2016-002005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Montchretien is still appreciated as a literate and author of tragedies, but is gravely neglected as an economist. His book - Traite de l’economie politique (1615) - is one of the most important expression of mercantilism. Like for the other mercantilists, Montchretien’s main concern was development through the expansion on manufactures, the organisation of the poor for labour, the increase of exportations and a keen economic competition with the other states. Montchretien enriches his arguments by drawing from his immense erudition about far and recent history, mythology and also a detailed and deep knowledge of the social and economic problems of his time. But his most important achievement was the foundation of modern political economy as different from ancient household economy. Contrary to the common conviction that the title of his book was just an unintentional chance, we are set to show that Montchretien was perfectly aware of the main features of the new economic science: management of social wealth in the public interest, growth of social wealth and a general welfare as the main aim, balance between private and public interest. Private interest is the spring of enrichment; its protection is the source of individual rights and of liberty. Public interest must ensure equal rights, welfare and protection of the poor.","PeriodicalId":40401,"journal":{"name":"History of Economic Thought and Policy","volume":"1 1","pages":"73-84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Montchrétien Founder of Political Economy\",\"authors\":\"C. Perrotta\",\"doi\":\"10.3280/SPE2016-002005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Montchretien is still appreciated as a literate and author of tragedies, but is gravely neglected as an economist. His book - Traite de l’economie politique (1615) - is one of the most important expression of mercantilism. Like for the other mercantilists, Montchretien’s main concern was development through the expansion on manufactures, the organisation of the poor for labour, the increase of exportations and a keen economic competition with the other states. Montchretien enriches his arguments by drawing from his immense erudition about far and recent history, mythology and also a detailed and deep knowledge of the social and economic problems of his time. But his most important achievement was the foundation of modern political economy as different from ancient household economy. Contrary to the common conviction that the title of his book was just an unintentional chance, we are set to show that Montchretien was perfectly aware of the main features of the new economic science: management of social wealth in the public interest, growth of social wealth and a general welfare as the main aim, balance between private and public interest. Private interest is the spring of enrichment; its protection is the source of individual rights and of liberty. Public interest must ensure equal rights, welfare and protection of the poor.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40401,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"History of Economic Thought and Policy\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"73-84\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"History of Economic Thought and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3280/SPE2016-002005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of Economic Thought and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3280/SPE2016-002005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
蒙克雷安作为一名文学作家和悲剧作家仍然受到赞赏,但作为一名经济学家却被严重忽视。他的著作《政治经济学的特征》(Traite de l’economie politique, 1615)是重商主义最重要的表达之一。与其他重商主义者一样,蒙克雷蒂安主要关注的是通过扩大制造业、组织穷人从事劳动、增加出口以及与其他州进行激烈的经济竞争来实现发展。蒙克雷蒂安丰富了他的论点,他对古代和近代的历史,神话,以及他那个时代的社会和经济问题的详细和深入的了解。但他最重要的成就是建立了区别于古代家庭经济的现代政治经济学。人们普遍认为,他的书的标题只是一个偶然的机会,与此相反,我们准备表明,蒙克雷安完全意识到新经济科学的主要特征:以公共利益管理社会财富,以社会财富和一般福利的增长为主要目标,平衡私人和公共利益。个人利益是致富的源泉;对它的保护是个人权利和自由的源泉。公共利益必须保证穷人的平等权利、福利和保护。
Montchretien is still appreciated as a literate and author of tragedies, but is gravely neglected as an economist. His book - Traite de l’economie politique (1615) - is one of the most important expression of mercantilism. Like for the other mercantilists, Montchretien’s main concern was development through the expansion on manufactures, the organisation of the poor for labour, the increase of exportations and a keen economic competition with the other states. Montchretien enriches his arguments by drawing from his immense erudition about far and recent history, mythology and also a detailed and deep knowledge of the social and economic problems of his time. But his most important achievement was the foundation of modern political economy as different from ancient household economy. Contrary to the common conviction that the title of his book was just an unintentional chance, we are set to show that Montchretien was perfectly aware of the main features of the new economic science: management of social wealth in the public interest, growth of social wealth and a general welfare as the main aim, balance between private and public interest. Private interest is the spring of enrichment; its protection is the source of individual rights and of liberty. Public interest must ensure equal rights, welfare and protection of the poor.