N. Capsoni, D. Privitera, C. Airoldi, S. Gheda, A. Mazzone, Gianluca Terranova, Filippo Galbiati, A. Bellone
{"title":"急诊行头盔CPAP治疗的COVID-19患者PaCO2变化趋势评价","authors":"N. Capsoni, D. Privitera, C. Airoldi, S. Gheda, A. Mazzone, Gianluca Terranova, Filippo Galbiati, A. Bellone","doi":"10.4081/ecj.2023.11274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in COVID-19 hypoxemic respiratory failure (h-ARF) under a strict protocol has been described to be highly efficient. However, early prediction of failure is crucial to avoid delayed intubation. Lower PaCO2 values may represent a higher inspiratory effort and, therefore, may help identify patients at greatest risk of CPAP failure. Aim of this study was to observe the PaCO2 trend of COVID-19 patients with h-ARF before and after the initial treatment with helmet-CPAP. A case series study was conducted from November 2020 to March 2021. All adult patients with h-ARF secondary to COVID-19 treated with helmet-CPAP and eligible for endotracheal intubation were observed. Of a total of 54 patients, 32 (59.3%) underwent intubation. Seven (12.9%) patients died in the ETI group, and none in the non-ETI group. Median PaO2/FiO2 ratio on admission was 91mmHg [IQR 68-185] vs. 104mmHg [IQR 85-215] (p=0.137) in the ETI e non-ETI group, respectively. No differences were found either for PaCO2 values on admission (31.5mmHg [IQR 27-35] vs. 29.3mmHg [IQR 27.7-40]) and for PaCO2 variations after 120 minutes of CPAP (+2.38mmHg ± 3.65 vs. +2.73mmHg ± 3.96). Changes in PaCO2 values were observed during an initial helmet-CPAP trial, but no differences were found in those undergoing endotracheal intubation as compared to the others.","PeriodicalId":51984,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Care Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of PaCO2 trend in COVID-19 patients undergoing helmet CPAP in the emergency department\",\"authors\":\"N. Capsoni, D. Privitera, C. Airoldi, S. Gheda, A. Mazzone, Gianluca Terranova, Filippo Galbiati, A. Bellone\",\"doi\":\"10.4081/ecj.2023.11274\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The use of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in COVID-19 hypoxemic respiratory failure (h-ARF) under a strict protocol has been described to be highly efficient. However, early prediction of failure is crucial to avoid delayed intubation. Lower PaCO2 values may represent a higher inspiratory effort and, therefore, may help identify patients at greatest risk of CPAP failure. Aim of this study was to observe the PaCO2 trend of COVID-19 patients with h-ARF before and after the initial treatment with helmet-CPAP. A case series study was conducted from November 2020 to March 2021. All adult patients with h-ARF secondary to COVID-19 treated with helmet-CPAP and eligible for endotracheal intubation were observed. Of a total of 54 patients, 32 (59.3%) underwent intubation. Seven (12.9%) patients died in the ETI group, and none in the non-ETI group. Median PaO2/FiO2 ratio on admission was 91mmHg [IQR 68-185] vs. 104mmHg [IQR 85-215] (p=0.137) in the ETI e non-ETI group, respectively. No differences were found either for PaCO2 values on admission (31.5mmHg [IQR 27-35] vs. 29.3mmHg [IQR 27.7-40]) and for PaCO2 variations after 120 minutes of CPAP (+2.38mmHg ± 3.65 vs. +2.73mmHg ± 3.96). Changes in PaCO2 values were observed during an initial helmet-CPAP trial, but no differences were found in those undergoing endotracheal intubation as compared to the others.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51984,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Emergency Care Journal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Emergency Care Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4081/ecj.2023.11274\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Care Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/ecj.2023.11274","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of PaCO2 trend in COVID-19 patients undergoing helmet CPAP in the emergency department
The use of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in COVID-19 hypoxemic respiratory failure (h-ARF) under a strict protocol has been described to be highly efficient. However, early prediction of failure is crucial to avoid delayed intubation. Lower PaCO2 values may represent a higher inspiratory effort and, therefore, may help identify patients at greatest risk of CPAP failure. Aim of this study was to observe the PaCO2 trend of COVID-19 patients with h-ARF before and after the initial treatment with helmet-CPAP. A case series study was conducted from November 2020 to March 2021. All adult patients with h-ARF secondary to COVID-19 treated with helmet-CPAP and eligible for endotracheal intubation were observed. Of a total of 54 patients, 32 (59.3%) underwent intubation. Seven (12.9%) patients died in the ETI group, and none in the non-ETI group. Median PaO2/FiO2 ratio on admission was 91mmHg [IQR 68-185] vs. 104mmHg [IQR 85-215] (p=0.137) in the ETI e non-ETI group, respectively. No differences were found either for PaCO2 values on admission (31.5mmHg [IQR 27-35] vs. 29.3mmHg [IQR 27.7-40]) and for PaCO2 variations after 120 minutes of CPAP (+2.38mmHg ± 3.65 vs. +2.73mmHg ± 3.96). Changes in PaCO2 values were observed during an initial helmet-CPAP trial, but no differences were found in those undergoing endotracheal intubation as compared to the others.