相同但不同

Q4 Arts and Humanities MICHIGAN QUARTERLY REVIEW Pub Date : 2005-01-01 DOI:10.3929/ETHZ-A-006694532
Lee Minh McGuire
{"title":"相同但不同","authors":"Lee Minh McGuire","doi":"10.3929/ETHZ-A-006694532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper discusses the discourse between corruption and workplace bullying by exploring their similarities and differences at a conceptual level. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive review, and to generate new insights, by drawing comparisons within the existing literature from the fields of corruption and workplace bullying. For the bases of this examination, we have systematically drawn our focus on the nature, definition, spread, impact, scale, control and measure, prevention and governance, and operation of these negative phenomenons. While corruption is often regarded as a political, economic and social problem, with serious consequences on many different levels, corruption and workplace bullying essentially share the same predatory nature. However, variations in perception and definitions have, in unison, made these predatory behaviors difficult to prevent, measure and control, increasing the chance of their prevalence if they are not recognized or understood and addressed. Although workplace bullying is usually perceived or portrayed as merely “trivial nuisance” or “interpersonal conflicts”, it can potentially escalate into something far more damaging. Similarly, petty corruption can evolve into grand corruption, when given the space to grow. In an organisational setting, this “space” is generally determined and/or facilitated by its designated Human Resources Management department. In this paper, we suggest that the relationship between corruption and workplace bullying can be a two way street, in the sense that some aspects of corruption may be applicable in workplace bullying, and vice versa. However, rather than trying to substitute existing knowledge with new hats, our intention is to provoke an alternative perspective by suggesting that the knowledge between corruption and workplace bullying may be transferrable, and that we can re-inform, re-interpret and reapply what we already know in one context, to another context that is reasonably similar, yet remains appreciatively different.","PeriodicalId":42682,"journal":{"name":"MICHIGAN QUARTERLY REVIEW","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Same Same but Different\",\"authors\":\"Lee Minh McGuire\",\"doi\":\"10.3929/ETHZ-A-006694532\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper discusses the discourse between corruption and workplace bullying by exploring their similarities and differences at a conceptual level. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive review, and to generate new insights, by drawing comparisons within the existing literature from the fields of corruption and workplace bullying. For the bases of this examination, we have systematically drawn our focus on the nature, definition, spread, impact, scale, control and measure, prevention and governance, and operation of these negative phenomenons. While corruption is often regarded as a political, economic and social problem, with serious consequences on many different levels, corruption and workplace bullying essentially share the same predatory nature. However, variations in perception and definitions have, in unison, made these predatory behaviors difficult to prevent, measure and control, increasing the chance of their prevalence if they are not recognized or understood and addressed. Although workplace bullying is usually perceived or portrayed as merely “trivial nuisance” or “interpersonal conflicts”, it can potentially escalate into something far more damaging. Similarly, petty corruption can evolve into grand corruption, when given the space to grow. In an organisational setting, this “space” is generally determined and/or facilitated by its designated Human Resources Management department. In this paper, we suggest that the relationship between corruption and workplace bullying can be a two way street, in the sense that some aspects of corruption may be applicable in workplace bullying, and vice versa. However, rather than trying to substitute existing knowledge with new hats, our intention is to provoke an alternative perspective by suggesting that the knowledge between corruption and workplace bullying may be transferrable, and that we can re-inform, re-interpret and reapply what we already know in one context, to another context that is reasonably similar, yet remains appreciatively different.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42682,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MICHIGAN QUARTERLY REVIEW\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MICHIGAN QUARTERLY REVIEW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3929/ETHZ-A-006694532\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MICHIGAN QUARTERLY REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3929/ETHZ-A-006694532","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文从概念层面探讨腐败与职场欺凌的异同,探讨二者之间的话语关系。本文旨在通过对腐败和职场欺凌领域的现有文献进行比较,提供全面的回顾,并产生新的见解。作为考察的基础,我们系统地将重点放在这些负面现象的性质、定义、传播、影响、规模、控制与措施、预防与治理、运行等方面。虽然腐败通常被视为一个政治、经济和社会问题,在许多不同层面产生严重后果,但腐败和职场欺凌本质上具有相同的掠夺性。然而,观念和定义的差异一致地使这些掠夺性行为难以预防、衡量和控制,如果不加以认识、理解和处理,就会增加其流行的机会。虽然职场欺凌通常被认为或描述为“微不足道的麻烦”或“人际冲突”,但它有可能升级为更具破坏性的事情。同样,如果有足够的空间,小腐败也会演变成大腐败。在组织环境中,这个“空间”通常由其指定的人力资源管理部门确定和/或促进。在本文中,我们认为腐败与职场欺凌之间的关系可能是双向的,也就是说,腐败的某些方面可能适用于职场欺凌,反之亦然。然而,我们的目的不是试图用新的帽子代替现有的知识,而是通过提出腐败和工作场所欺凌之间的知识可能是可转移的,我们可以重新告知,重新解释和重新应用我们在一个环境中已经知道的东西,到另一个环境中,这是相当相似的,但仍然有很大的不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Same Same but Different
This paper discusses the discourse between corruption and workplace bullying by exploring their similarities and differences at a conceptual level. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive review, and to generate new insights, by drawing comparisons within the existing literature from the fields of corruption and workplace bullying. For the bases of this examination, we have systematically drawn our focus on the nature, definition, spread, impact, scale, control and measure, prevention and governance, and operation of these negative phenomenons. While corruption is often regarded as a political, economic and social problem, with serious consequences on many different levels, corruption and workplace bullying essentially share the same predatory nature. However, variations in perception and definitions have, in unison, made these predatory behaviors difficult to prevent, measure and control, increasing the chance of their prevalence if they are not recognized or understood and addressed. Although workplace bullying is usually perceived or portrayed as merely “trivial nuisance” or “interpersonal conflicts”, it can potentially escalate into something far more damaging. Similarly, petty corruption can evolve into grand corruption, when given the space to grow. In an organisational setting, this “space” is generally determined and/or facilitated by its designated Human Resources Management department. In this paper, we suggest that the relationship between corruption and workplace bullying can be a two way street, in the sense that some aspects of corruption may be applicable in workplace bullying, and vice versa. However, rather than trying to substitute existing knowledge with new hats, our intention is to provoke an alternative perspective by suggesting that the knowledge between corruption and workplace bullying may be transferrable, and that we can re-inform, re-interpret and reapply what we already know in one context, to another context that is reasonably similar, yet remains appreciatively different.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
MICHIGAN QUARTERLY REVIEW
MICHIGAN QUARTERLY REVIEW LITERARY REVIEWS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
期刊介绍: Michigan Quarterly Review, founded in 1962, is the University of Michigan"s flagship journal, publishing each season a collection of essays, interviews, memoirs, fiction, poetry, and book reviews. Since 1979, when an issue called "The Moon Landing and Its Aftermath" appeared, one issue each year has been entirely devoted to a special theme. Some of MQR"s most recent special issues are "Vietnam: Beyond the Frame," "The Documentary Imagination," and "China.
期刊最新文献
A Woman Warrior Wearing Sunglasses Against the Sun & Smell of Smoke Was That a Song Thomas Mann in America Agee after Cavell, Cavell after Agee
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1