南亚食用油生产的比较优势:使用政策分析矩阵的评估

S. Sahibzada, D. Hemachandra, S. Weerasooriya, J. Weerahewa
{"title":"南亚食用油生产的比较优势:使用政策分析矩阵的评估","authors":"S. Sahibzada, D. Hemachandra, S. Weerasooriya, J. Weerahewa","doi":"10.4038/tar.v32i4.8517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is growing interest and efforts by the governments of South Asian countries to improve the competitiveness of domestic edible oil production with the objective of substituting for imports. This study evaluates and compares the comparative advantage and social profitability of the production of edible oils in Bangladesh, India, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka using the Policy Analysis Matrix (PAM) approach. The data required for this analysis were obtained from the Input-Output (I-O) table of the Global Trade Analysis Project (GTAP) Database (Version 10). Edible oils include animal fats, vegetable oils, margarine, and oil cake. Plant and animal sources, extraction, wearing, and electronic manufactures were treated as tradable inputs, while labor and capital were treated as non-tradable inputs. Results revealed that edible oils output is highly protected in Bangladesh while the inputs are highly protected in Pakistan. Production of edible oils, is a socially profitable activity in India, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka and they have a comparative advantage which is attributed to the low cost of non -tradable inputs. Conversely, edible oil production is not socially profitable in Bangladesh and the social cost of non-tradable inputs is higher than those of other inputs. It shows that Bangladesh does not have a comparative advantage in edible oil production. Inputs extracted from plant sources are highly taxed in Pakistan, and hence its comparative advantage is not revealed in export statistics. It is recommended that distortions in edible oil industry be removed to realize its comparative advantage.","PeriodicalId":23313,"journal":{"name":"Tropical agricultural research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Advantage of Edible Oil Production in South Asia: An Assessment Using the Policy Analysis Matrix\",\"authors\":\"S. Sahibzada, D. Hemachandra, S. Weerasooriya, J. Weerahewa\",\"doi\":\"10.4038/tar.v32i4.8517\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There is growing interest and efforts by the governments of South Asian countries to improve the competitiveness of domestic edible oil production with the objective of substituting for imports. This study evaluates and compares the comparative advantage and social profitability of the production of edible oils in Bangladesh, India, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka using the Policy Analysis Matrix (PAM) approach. The data required for this analysis were obtained from the Input-Output (I-O) table of the Global Trade Analysis Project (GTAP) Database (Version 10). Edible oils include animal fats, vegetable oils, margarine, and oil cake. Plant and animal sources, extraction, wearing, and electronic manufactures were treated as tradable inputs, while labor and capital were treated as non-tradable inputs. Results revealed that edible oils output is highly protected in Bangladesh while the inputs are highly protected in Pakistan. Production of edible oils, is a socially profitable activity in India, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka and they have a comparative advantage which is attributed to the low cost of non -tradable inputs. Conversely, edible oil production is not socially profitable in Bangladesh and the social cost of non-tradable inputs is higher than those of other inputs. It shows that Bangladesh does not have a comparative advantage in edible oil production. Inputs extracted from plant sources are highly taxed in Pakistan, and hence its comparative advantage is not revealed in export statistics. It is recommended that distortions in edible oil industry be removed to realize its comparative advantage.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tropical agricultural research\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tropical agricultural research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4038/tar.v32i4.8517\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tropical agricultural research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4038/tar.v32i4.8517","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

南亚各国政府越来越有兴趣和努力提高国内食用油生产的竞争力,以替代进口。本研究使用政策分析矩阵(PAM)方法对孟加拉国、印度、巴基斯坦和斯里兰卡的食用油生产的比较优势和社会盈利能力进行了评估和比较。本分析所需的数据来自全球贸易分析项目(GTAP)数据库(第10版)的投入产出表。食用油包括动物脂肪、植物油、人造黄油和油饼。动植物资源、采掘业、服装业和电子制造业被视为可贸易投入,而劳动力和资本被视为不可贸易投入。结果显示,孟加拉国的食用油产量受到高度保护,而巴基斯坦的食用油投入受到高度保护。在印度、巴基斯坦和斯里兰卡,食用油生产是一项有益于社会的活动,它们具有比较优势,这归因于非贸易投入的低成本。相反,在孟加拉国,食用油生产没有社会利润,非贸易投入的社会成本高于其他投入。这表明孟加拉国在食用油生产方面没有比较优势。在巴基斯坦,从植物中提取的投入物的税率很高,因此其比较优势没有在出口统计中显示出来。建议消除食用油行业的扭曲,实现其比较优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative Advantage of Edible Oil Production in South Asia: An Assessment Using the Policy Analysis Matrix
There is growing interest and efforts by the governments of South Asian countries to improve the competitiveness of domestic edible oil production with the objective of substituting for imports. This study evaluates and compares the comparative advantage and social profitability of the production of edible oils in Bangladesh, India, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka using the Policy Analysis Matrix (PAM) approach. The data required for this analysis were obtained from the Input-Output (I-O) table of the Global Trade Analysis Project (GTAP) Database (Version 10). Edible oils include animal fats, vegetable oils, margarine, and oil cake. Plant and animal sources, extraction, wearing, and electronic manufactures were treated as tradable inputs, while labor and capital were treated as non-tradable inputs. Results revealed that edible oils output is highly protected in Bangladesh while the inputs are highly protected in Pakistan. Production of edible oils, is a socially profitable activity in India, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka and they have a comparative advantage which is attributed to the low cost of non -tradable inputs. Conversely, edible oil production is not socially profitable in Bangladesh and the social cost of non-tradable inputs is higher than those of other inputs. It shows that Bangladesh does not have a comparative advantage in edible oil production. Inputs extracted from plant sources are highly taxed in Pakistan, and hence its comparative advantage is not revealed in export statistics. It is recommended that distortions in edible oil industry be removed to realize its comparative advantage.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Production and Dietary Diversities with Seasonality in Rural Agricultural Context in Sri Lanka: A Case of Mahakanumulla Village Tank Cascade System Changes in Total and Available K Contents in Feldspar and Mica Co-pyrolyzed with Poultry Litter at Different Temperatures Introducing a ‘Postharvest Loss Index (PHLI)’ for Some Selected High Producing Vegetables in Sri Lanka to Enhance Food Security Behavioral Intention of Paddy Farmers Towards Adoption of Organic Sources for Soil Nutrient Management Consequent to Policy Decision to Ban Agro-chemicals in Sri Lanka: A Case Study Solid Formulation of Trichoderma virens for the Management of Banana Anthracnose Caused by Colletotrichum musae
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1