{"title":"中国经济主要金融市场的波动性、关联度和市场依赖性","authors":"K. Liow, J. Song, Xiaoxiao Zhou","doi":"10.3934/QFE.2021018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the increasing openness of the China economy, the goal of this paper is to examine volatility connectedness and spillover transmissions across markets for stock, public real estate, bond, commodity futures, and foreign exchange within the China economy. Over the full study period, we find that the five China’s financial markets are not strongly volatility connected. The bond market is the predominant market of spillover transmission, whereas the commodity futures market is the top net recipient of volatility connectedness shocks. The role of spillover transmission increased during the three financial crisis periods studied. Additionally, the five markets display some degree of nonlinear causal dependence. During the Chinese stock market crash, the stock and public real estate reacted with similar patterns and larger positive or negative responses to shocks, whereas bonds and commodity futures have milder shocks response. Our findings have important implications for portfolio investors in asset diversification and policymakers in their domestic macroprudential policy coordination and control.","PeriodicalId":45226,"journal":{"name":"Quantitative Finance and Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Volatility connectedness and market dependence across major financial markets in China economy\",\"authors\":\"K. Liow, J. Song, Xiaoxiao Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.3934/QFE.2021018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With the increasing openness of the China economy, the goal of this paper is to examine volatility connectedness and spillover transmissions across markets for stock, public real estate, bond, commodity futures, and foreign exchange within the China economy. Over the full study period, we find that the five China’s financial markets are not strongly volatility connected. The bond market is the predominant market of spillover transmission, whereas the commodity futures market is the top net recipient of volatility connectedness shocks. The role of spillover transmission increased during the three financial crisis periods studied. Additionally, the five markets display some degree of nonlinear causal dependence. During the Chinese stock market crash, the stock and public real estate reacted with similar patterns and larger positive or negative responses to shocks, whereas bonds and commodity futures have milder shocks response. Our findings have important implications for portfolio investors in asset diversification and policymakers in their domestic macroprudential policy coordination and control.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45226,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quantitative Finance and Economics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"22\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quantitative Finance and Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3934/QFE.2021018\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quantitative Finance and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3934/QFE.2021018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Volatility connectedness and market dependence across major financial markets in China economy
With the increasing openness of the China economy, the goal of this paper is to examine volatility connectedness and spillover transmissions across markets for stock, public real estate, bond, commodity futures, and foreign exchange within the China economy. Over the full study period, we find that the five China’s financial markets are not strongly volatility connected. The bond market is the predominant market of spillover transmission, whereas the commodity futures market is the top net recipient of volatility connectedness shocks. The role of spillover transmission increased during the three financial crisis periods studied. Additionally, the five markets display some degree of nonlinear causal dependence. During the Chinese stock market crash, the stock and public real estate reacted with similar patterns and larger positive or negative responses to shocks, whereas bonds and commodity futures have milder shocks response. Our findings have important implications for portfolio investors in asset diversification and policymakers in their domestic macroprudential policy coordination and control.