民主社会的绿色融资前景

IF 5.5 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Green Finance Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.3934/gf.2023007
H. Bennink
{"title":"民主社会的绿色融资前景","authors":"H. Bennink","doi":"10.3934/gf.2023007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<abstract> <p>Financing ecological and other grand global challenges is faced with intertwined issues at both the institutional side and the public side as elements of the tragedy of the quintuple horizons. These horizons are approached from a systemic perspective, with attention on the key players involved. Starting with (system) banks, their conservative attitude is explained in terms of the iron cage theory. Next, green challenges are pictured as 'very wicked' problems, varying in moral intensity. The conflicting roles of the public as citizens and as consumers are described in terms of Kohlberg's theory of cognitive moral development. Responsibilities for future generations are clarified by distinguishing the responsibility as accountability and the responsibility as virtue. Assignments for a green future are explored from the perspective of green financing with a focus on what should be expected from the public at large in multiparty democratic societies, keeping in mind that other societies are characterized by diverting economic and political dynamics, and hence, other modes of operating<sup>1</sup>.</p> <p><sup>1</sup> See, for instance, for China: <xref ref-type=\"bibr\" rid=\"b133\">Macaire & Naef (2022)</xref> and <xref ref-type=\"bibr\" rid=\"b128\">Liu, Wang, Zhang & Zhang (2019)</xref>.</p> </abstract>","PeriodicalId":41466,"journal":{"name":"Green Finance","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prospects of green financing in democratic societies\",\"authors\":\"H. Bennink\",\"doi\":\"10.3934/gf.2023007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<abstract> <p>Financing ecological and other grand global challenges is faced with intertwined issues at both the institutional side and the public side as elements of the tragedy of the quintuple horizons. These horizons are approached from a systemic perspective, with attention on the key players involved. Starting with (system) banks, their conservative attitude is explained in terms of the iron cage theory. Next, green challenges are pictured as 'very wicked' problems, varying in moral intensity. The conflicting roles of the public as citizens and as consumers are described in terms of Kohlberg's theory of cognitive moral development. Responsibilities for future generations are clarified by distinguishing the responsibility as accountability and the responsibility as virtue. Assignments for a green future are explored from the perspective of green financing with a focus on what should be expected from the public at large in multiparty democratic societies, keeping in mind that other societies are characterized by diverting economic and political dynamics, and hence, other modes of operating<sup>1</sup>.</p> <p><sup>1</sup> See, for instance, for China: <xref ref-type=\\\"bibr\\\" rid=\\\"b133\\\">Macaire & Naef (2022)</xref> and <xref ref-type=\\\"bibr\\\" rid=\\\"b128\\\">Liu, Wang, Zhang & Zhang (2019)</xref>.</p> </abstract>\",\"PeriodicalId\":41466,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Green Finance\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Green Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3934/gf.2023007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Green Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3934/gf.2023007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为生态和其他重大的全球挑战提供资金,在制度方面和公共方面都面临着相互交织的问题,是“五重视野”悲剧的要素。这些视界是从系统的角度来看待的,关注所涉及的关键参与者。从(系统)银行开始,用铁笼理论解释它们的保守态度。其次,绿色挑战被描绘成“非常邪恶”的问题,道德强度各不相同。Kohlberg的认知道德发展理论描述了公众作为公民和消费者的冲突角色。通过区分责任作为责任和责任作为美德,明确了对子孙后代的责任。从绿色融资的角度探讨绿色未来的任务,重点关注多党制民主社会中公众应该期待什么,同时要记住,其他社会的特点是转移经济和政治动态,因此,其他运作模式1.1参见,例如中国:Macaire & Naef(2022)和Liu, Wang, Zhang & Zhang(2019)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prospects of green financing in democratic societies

Financing ecological and other grand global challenges is faced with intertwined issues at both the institutional side and the public side as elements of the tragedy of the quintuple horizons. These horizons are approached from a systemic perspective, with attention on the key players involved. Starting with (system) banks, their conservative attitude is explained in terms of the iron cage theory. Next, green challenges are pictured as 'very wicked' problems, varying in moral intensity. The conflicting roles of the public as citizens and as consumers are described in terms of Kohlberg's theory of cognitive moral development. Responsibilities for future generations are clarified by distinguishing the responsibility as accountability and the responsibility as virtue. Assignments for a green future are explored from the perspective of green financing with a focus on what should be expected from the public at large in multiparty democratic societies, keeping in mind that other societies are characterized by diverting economic and political dynamics, and hence, other modes of operating1.

1 See, for instance, for China: Macaire & Naef (2022) and Liu, Wang, Zhang & Zhang (2019).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Green Finance
Green Finance Multiple-
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
3.50%
发文量
14
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Green Finance is an international, interdisciplinary Open Access journal dedicated to green finance, environmental, and sustainability research and practice. It offers a platform for publishing original contributions and technical reviews on green finance and related topics, following a rigorous peer-review process. Accepted article types include original research, reviews, editorials, letters, and conference reports.
期刊最新文献
Prospects of green financing in democratic societies Insuring a greener future: How green insurance drives investment in sustainable projects in developing countries? Cultural context, organizational performance and Sustainable Development Goals: A pending task Does corporate reputation play a mediating role in the association between manufacturing companies' corporate social responsibility (CSR) and financial performance? Financing low-carbon hydrogen: The role of public policies and strategies in the EU, UK and USA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1