眼眶虫科(有孔虫目)外骨骼的分类应用:白垩纪/古近纪统一方法的一种主张

IF 1.3 4区 地球科学 Q3 PALEONTOLOGY Micropaleontology Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.47894/mpal.66.1.03
F. Schlagintweit
{"title":"眼眶虫科(有孔虫目)外骨骼的分类应用:白垩纪/古近纪统一方法的一种主张","authors":"F. Schlagintweit","doi":"10.47894/mpal.66.1.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on the distinctly higher number of species of Orbitolinidae in the Cretaceous compared to the Paleogene, the former have witnessed much more taxonomic analyses. Although, there has been a \"lively\" debate among specialists working on Cretaceous taxa, it is rather broad consensus that the presence/absence of horizontal partitions (= rafters; part of exoskeleton) in the marginal zone is a criterion of specific rank. Recently, however, another taxonomic concept has been used for Paleogene Orbitolinidae by giving this trait generic rank (Fallotella vs. Pseudofallotella). If applied to the Cretaceous, this approach would result in artificial groups and the creation of several new genera for currently used species that both include species with and without rafters (Coskinolinella, Heterocoskinolina, Montseciella, Paracoskinolina, Praedictyorbitolina, Simplorbitolina, Valserina). The present contribution is a plea for a uniform taxonomic approach, preferring the simpler, longer, wider and more natural usage of the \"Cretaceous approach\". Further difficulties on the taxonomical ranking of Orbitolinidae features are due to their fossil nature (extinct group), as no modern representatives are available for comparisons. This fact also speaks for the use of a pragmatic and uniform approach.","PeriodicalId":49816,"journal":{"name":"Micropaleontology","volume":"128 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Taxonomic use of the exoskeleton in the family Orbitolinidae (Foraminifera): Aplea for a uniform Cretaceous/Paleogene approach\",\"authors\":\"F. Schlagintweit\",\"doi\":\"10.47894/mpal.66.1.03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Based on the distinctly higher number of species of Orbitolinidae in the Cretaceous compared to the Paleogene, the former have witnessed much more taxonomic analyses. Although, there has been a \\\"lively\\\" debate among specialists working on Cretaceous taxa, it is rather broad consensus that the presence/absence of horizontal partitions (= rafters; part of exoskeleton) in the marginal zone is a criterion of specific rank. Recently, however, another taxonomic concept has been used for Paleogene Orbitolinidae by giving this trait generic rank (Fallotella vs. Pseudofallotella). If applied to the Cretaceous, this approach would result in artificial groups and the creation of several new genera for currently used species that both include species with and without rafters (Coskinolinella, Heterocoskinolina, Montseciella, Paracoskinolina, Praedictyorbitolina, Simplorbitolina, Valserina). The present contribution is a plea for a uniform taxonomic approach, preferring the simpler, longer, wider and more natural usage of the \\\"Cretaceous approach\\\". Further difficulties on the taxonomical ranking of Orbitolinidae features are due to their fossil nature (extinct group), as no modern representatives are available for comparisons. This fact also speaks for the use of a pragmatic and uniform approach.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49816,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Micropaleontology\",\"volume\":\"128 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Micropaleontology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47894/mpal.66.1.03\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PALEONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Micropaleontology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47894/mpal.66.1.03","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PALEONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

基于白垩纪眶鸟科的物种数量明显高于古近纪,前者得到了更多的分类分析。尽管研究白垩纪分类群的专家之间一直存在着“激烈”的争论,但普遍的共识是,水平隔板(=椽子)的存在/缺失;部分外骨骼)在边缘地带是一个特定等级的标准。然而,最近,另一种分类概念被用于古近系眼眶虫科,通过给予该性状的属级(Fallotella与Pseudofallotella)。如果应用于白垩纪,这种方法将导致人工类群的产生,并为目前使用的物种创造几个新属,包括有和没有梁的物种(Coskinolinella, Heterocoskinolina, Montseciella, Paracoskinolina, Praedictyorbitolina, Simplorbitolina, Valserina)。目前的贡献是请求一种统一的分类方法,更倾向于“白垩纪方法”的更简单、更长、更广泛和更自然的用法。进一步的困难是由于它们的化石性质(已灭绝的类群),因为没有可用于比较的现代代表。这一事实也说明应采取务实和统一的办法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Taxonomic use of the exoskeleton in the family Orbitolinidae (Foraminifera): Aplea for a uniform Cretaceous/Paleogene approach
Based on the distinctly higher number of species of Orbitolinidae in the Cretaceous compared to the Paleogene, the former have witnessed much more taxonomic analyses. Although, there has been a "lively" debate among specialists working on Cretaceous taxa, it is rather broad consensus that the presence/absence of horizontal partitions (= rafters; part of exoskeleton) in the marginal zone is a criterion of specific rank. Recently, however, another taxonomic concept has been used for Paleogene Orbitolinidae by giving this trait generic rank (Fallotella vs. Pseudofallotella). If applied to the Cretaceous, this approach would result in artificial groups and the creation of several new genera for currently used species that both include species with and without rafters (Coskinolinella, Heterocoskinolina, Montseciella, Paracoskinolina, Praedictyorbitolina, Simplorbitolina, Valserina). The present contribution is a plea for a uniform taxonomic approach, preferring the simpler, longer, wider and more natural usage of the "Cretaceous approach". Further difficulties on the taxonomical ranking of Orbitolinidae features are due to their fossil nature (extinct group), as no modern representatives are available for comparisons. This fact also speaks for the use of a pragmatic and uniform approach.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Micropaleontology
Micropaleontology 地学-古生物学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
18
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Micropalaeontology (JM) is an established international journal covering all aspects of microfossils and their application to both applied studies and basic research. In particular we welcome submissions relating to microfossils and their application to palaeoceanography, palaeoclimatology, palaeobiology, evolution, taxonomy, environmental change and molecular phylogeny. Owned by The Micropalaeontological Society, the scope of the journal is broad, demonstrating the application of microfossils to solving broad geoscience issues.
期刊最新文献
Freshwater fishes (Actinopterygii) of Kenyir Reservoir, Peninsular Malaysia: Updated checklist, taxonomic concerns and alien species. Roadian (Earliest Guadalupian, Middle Permian) Radiolarians from the Guadalupe Mountains, West Texas, USA Part III: Latentifistularia Organic-walled marine microplankton from the Hauterivian and early Barremian of the North Sea Region - biostratigraphy and taxonomy Priabonian (upper Eocene) larger foraminifera from the Helvetic Nappes of the Alps (Western Switzerland): new markers for Shallow Benthic zones 19-20 Systematic paleontology and biostratigraphy of upper Eocene larger benthic foraminifera from Fanari (Thrace Basin, Greece)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1