公共价值管理算法

IF 0.8 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE International Journal of Public Administration in the Digital Age Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.4018/ijpada.20210101.oa9
Friso Selten, A. Meijer
{"title":"公共价值管理算法","authors":"Friso Selten, A. Meijer","doi":"10.4018/ijpada.20210101.oa9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Public organisations increasingly rely on machine learning algorithms in performing many of their core activities. It is therefore important to consider how algorithms are transforming the public sector. This article aims to clarify this by assessing algorithms from a public value perspective. Based on a discussion of the literature, it is demonstrated that algorithms are generally expected to strengthen organisational performance on a first cluster of values related to the ability to be effective and efficient (sigma values). At the same time, the use of algorithms is linked to negatively affect a second cluster of values that involves fairness and transparency (theta values). In the current academic debate little attention is given to an important third cluster of values; the ability of organisations to be adaptive and robust (lambda values). This discussion highlights that algorithms invoke public value opportunities, but also public value risks and trade-offs. This article therefore presents five principles for managing algorithms from a public value perspective.","PeriodicalId":42809,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Public Administration in the Digital Age","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Managing Algorithms for Public Value\",\"authors\":\"Friso Selten, A. Meijer\",\"doi\":\"10.4018/ijpada.20210101.oa9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Public organisations increasingly rely on machine learning algorithms in performing many of their core activities. It is therefore important to consider how algorithms are transforming the public sector. This article aims to clarify this by assessing algorithms from a public value perspective. Based on a discussion of the literature, it is demonstrated that algorithms are generally expected to strengthen organisational performance on a first cluster of values related to the ability to be effective and efficient (sigma values). At the same time, the use of algorithms is linked to negatively affect a second cluster of values that involves fairness and transparency (theta values). In the current academic debate little attention is given to an important third cluster of values; the ability of organisations to be adaptive and robust (lambda values). This discussion highlights that algorithms invoke public value opportunities, but also public value risks and trade-offs. This article therefore presents five principles for managing algorithms from a public value perspective.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42809,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Public Administration in the Digital Age\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Public Administration in the Digital Age\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4018/ijpada.20210101.oa9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Public Administration in the Digital Age","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/ijpada.20210101.oa9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

公共机构越来越依赖机器学习算法来执行许多核心活动。因此,考虑算法如何改变公共部门是很重要的。本文旨在通过从公共价值角度评估算法来澄清这一点。基于对文献的讨论,证明了算法通常被期望在与有效和高效能力(西格玛值)相关的第一组值上加强组织绩效。与此同时,算法的使用会对涉及公平性和透明度的第二组值(θ值)产生负面影响。在当前的学术辩论中,很少有人关注重要的第三类价值观;组织的适应性和健壮性(lambda值)。这个讨论强调了算法调用公共价值机会,但也调用公共价值风险和权衡。因此,本文从公共价值的角度提出了管理算法的五个原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Managing Algorithms for Public Value
Public organisations increasingly rely on machine learning algorithms in performing many of their core activities. It is therefore important to consider how algorithms are transforming the public sector. This article aims to clarify this by assessing algorithms from a public value perspective. Based on a discussion of the literature, it is demonstrated that algorithms are generally expected to strengthen organisational performance on a first cluster of values related to the ability to be effective and efficient (sigma values). At the same time, the use of algorithms is linked to negatively affect a second cluster of values that involves fairness and transparency (theta values). In the current academic debate little attention is given to an important third cluster of values; the ability of organisations to be adaptive and robust (lambda values). This discussion highlights that algorithms invoke public value opportunities, but also public value risks and trade-offs. This article therefore presents five principles for managing algorithms from a public value perspective.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊最新文献
Configurational Analysis of Infrastructuring in Digital Identity Platforms An Evaluation Framework for the Impact of Digitalization on the Quality of Governance The Correspondence Between PIKSA Model and the Community's Well-Being A New Model for a New Nature A Literature Review of E-Government Research in Mexico Utilizing the PRISMA Methodology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1