{"title":"走向晚期福柯的文学政治:直言与模仿","authors":"A. G. Blanco","doi":"10.3917/rip.292.0029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article posits that in Foucault’s later work we find not a forgetting of literature, but a reformulation of the role that literature had come to occupy in his work, and that, in this later work, there is a trace of the texts on literary thought that he wrote from the 1960s to the mid-1970s. Drawing upon Foucault’s later work, I reconsider the key question: What relationship does literature, as literature, have with the political dimension of discourses? This necessarily goes hand-in-hand with the classic question concerning the truth of literature: How does literature tell the truth?","PeriodicalId":44846,"journal":{"name":"REVUE INTERNATIONALE DE PHILOSOPHIE","volume":"1 1","pages":"29-38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards a Politics of Literature in Late Foucault: Parrhesia and Mimesis\",\"authors\":\"A. G. Blanco\",\"doi\":\"10.3917/rip.292.0029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article posits that in Foucault’s later work we find not a forgetting of literature, but a reformulation of the role that literature had come to occupy in his work, and that, in this later work, there is a trace of the texts on literary thought that he wrote from the 1960s to the mid-1970s. Drawing upon Foucault’s later work, I reconsider the key question: What relationship does literature, as literature, have with the political dimension of discourses? This necessarily goes hand-in-hand with the classic question concerning the truth of literature: How does literature tell the truth?\",\"PeriodicalId\":44846,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"REVUE INTERNATIONALE DE PHILOSOPHIE\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"29-38\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"REVUE INTERNATIONALE DE PHILOSOPHIE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3917/rip.292.0029\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REVUE INTERNATIONALE DE PHILOSOPHIE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3917/rip.292.0029","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Towards a Politics of Literature in Late Foucault: Parrhesia and Mimesis
This article posits that in Foucault’s later work we find not a forgetting of literature, but a reformulation of the role that literature had come to occupy in his work, and that, in this later work, there is a trace of the texts on literary thought that he wrote from the 1960s to the mid-1970s. Drawing upon Foucault’s later work, I reconsider the key question: What relationship does literature, as literature, have with the political dimension of discourses? This necessarily goes hand-in-hand with the classic question concerning the truth of literature: How does literature tell the truth?