益生菌对重症急性胰腺炎患者败血症并发症的影响评价。系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 1.7 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Przegla̜d Gastroenterologiczny Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-07-15 DOI:10.5114/pg.2022.118164
Adnan Malik, Waseem Amjad, Umer Farooq, Saad Saleem Saleem, Muhammad Imran Malik
{"title":"益生菌对重症急性胰腺炎患者败血症并发症的影响评价。系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Adnan Malik, Waseem Amjad, Umer Farooq, Saad Saleem Saleem, Muhammad Imran Malik","doi":"10.5114/pg.2022.118164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) with major complications such as necrosis and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) often leads to high mortality rates despite intensive treatment.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the effect of symbiotics (probiotics) on septic complications in patients with SAP.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We searched the PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, SCOPUS, and Web of Science databases for relevant clinical trials and excluded observational studies. Quality appraisal was evaluated according to GRADE, and we assessed the risk of bias using Cochrane's risk of bias tool. We included the following outcomes: C-reactive protein (CRP), APACHE II score, hospital stay, multiorgan failure (MOF), systemic inflammatory response syndrome, infected pancreatic necrosis, septicaemia, need for operation, and death. We performed the analysis of homogeneous data under a fixed-effects model, while analysis of heterogeneous data were analysed under a random-effects model. We performed the analysis of dichotomous outcomes using the risk ratio (RR) and relative 95% confidence interval (CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included a total of 7 clinical trials. We found that there was no significant difference between both groups regarding MOF (RR = 0.60 (0.25, 1.44), <i>p</i> = 0.26), septicaemia (RR = 0.66 (0.29, 1.50), <i>p</i> = 0.32), death (RR = 0.66 (0.19, 2.26), <i>p</i> = 0.51), infected pancreatic necrosis (RR = 0.50 (0.18, 1.38), <i>p</i> = 0.18), SIRS (RR = 0.81 (0.29, 2.23), <i>p</i> = 0.68), CRP, APACHE II score, and hospital stay.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Contrary to some published trials, our meta-analysis concludes that the use of probiotics in patients with SAP is not effective in reducing the mortality rate, septic complications, and need for operation.</p>","PeriodicalId":20719,"journal":{"name":"Przegla̜d Gastroenterologiczny","volume":"1 1","pages":"281-291"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10626380/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the effect of probiotics on septic complications in patients with severe acute pancreatitis. A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Adnan Malik, Waseem Amjad, Umer Farooq, Saad Saleem Saleem, Muhammad Imran Malik\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/pg.2022.118164\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) with major complications such as necrosis and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) often leads to high mortality rates despite intensive treatment.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the effect of symbiotics (probiotics) on septic complications in patients with SAP.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We searched the PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, SCOPUS, and Web of Science databases for relevant clinical trials and excluded observational studies. Quality appraisal was evaluated according to GRADE, and we assessed the risk of bias using Cochrane's risk of bias tool. We included the following outcomes: C-reactive protein (CRP), APACHE II score, hospital stay, multiorgan failure (MOF), systemic inflammatory response syndrome, infected pancreatic necrosis, septicaemia, need for operation, and death. We performed the analysis of homogeneous data under a fixed-effects model, while analysis of heterogeneous data were analysed under a random-effects model. We performed the analysis of dichotomous outcomes using the risk ratio (RR) and relative 95% confidence interval (CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included a total of 7 clinical trials. We found that there was no significant difference between both groups regarding MOF (RR = 0.60 (0.25, 1.44), <i>p</i> = 0.26), septicaemia (RR = 0.66 (0.29, 1.50), <i>p</i> = 0.32), death (RR = 0.66 (0.19, 2.26), <i>p</i> = 0.51), infected pancreatic necrosis (RR = 0.50 (0.18, 1.38), <i>p</i> = 0.18), SIRS (RR = 0.81 (0.29, 2.23), <i>p</i> = 0.68), CRP, APACHE II score, and hospital stay.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Contrary to some published trials, our meta-analysis concludes that the use of probiotics in patients with SAP is not effective in reducing the mortality rate, septic complications, and need for operation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20719,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Przegla̜d Gastroenterologiczny\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"281-291\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10626380/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Przegla̜d Gastroenterologiczny\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/pg.2022.118164\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/7/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Przegla̜d Gastroenterologiczny","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/pg.2022.118164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:重症急性胰腺炎(SAP)伴有坏死和多器官功能障碍综合征(MODS)等主要并发症,尽管进行了强化治疗,但往往会导致高死亡率。目的:评估共生菌(益生菌)对SAP患者败血症并发症的影响。材料和方法:我们在PubMed、Cochrane CENTRAL、SCOPUS和Web of Science数据库中搜索相关临床试验和排除的观察性研究。质量评估根据GRADE进行评估,我们使用Cochrane的偏倚风险工具评估偏倚风险。我们包括以下结果:C反应蛋白(CRP)、APACHE II评分、住院时间、多器官衰竭(MOF)、全身炎症反应综合征、感染性胰腺坏死、败血症、需要手术和死亡。我们在固定效应模型下对同质数据进行分析,而在随机效应模型下分析异质数据。我们使用风险比(RR)和相对95%置信区间(CI)对二分结果进行了分析。结果:我们共纳入了7项临床试验。我们发现,两组之间在MOF(RR=0.60(0.25,1.44),p=0.26),败血症(RR=0.66(0.29,1.50),p=0.32),死亡(RR=0.06(0.19,2.26),p=0.51),感染性胰腺坏死(RR=0.50(0.18,1.38),p=0.18),SIRS(RR=0.81(0.29、2.23),p=0.68),CRP,APACHE II评分和住院时间方面没有显著差异。结论:与一些已发表的试验相反,我们的荟萃分析得出结论,在SAP患者中使用益生菌在降低死亡率、败血症并发症和手术需求方面无效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of the effect of probiotics on septic complications in patients with severe acute pancreatitis. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Introduction: Severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) with major complications such as necrosis and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) often leads to high mortality rates despite intensive treatment.

Aim: To evaluate the effect of symbiotics (probiotics) on septic complications in patients with SAP.

Material and methods: We searched the PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, SCOPUS, and Web of Science databases for relevant clinical trials and excluded observational studies. Quality appraisal was evaluated according to GRADE, and we assessed the risk of bias using Cochrane's risk of bias tool. We included the following outcomes: C-reactive protein (CRP), APACHE II score, hospital stay, multiorgan failure (MOF), systemic inflammatory response syndrome, infected pancreatic necrosis, septicaemia, need for operation, and death. We performed the analysis of homogeneous data under a fixed-effects model, while analysis of heterogeneous data were analysed under a random-effects model. We performed the analysis of dichotomous outcomes using the risk ratio (RR) and relative 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results: We included a total of 7 clinical trials. We found that there was no significant difference between both groups regarding MOF (RR = 0.60 (0.25, 1.44), p = 0.26), septicaemia (RR = 0.66 (0.29, 1.50), p = 0.32), death (RR = 0.66 (0.19, 2.26), p = 0.51), infected pancreatic necrosis (RR = 0.50 (0.18, 1.38), p = 0.18), SIRS (RR = 0.81 (0.29, 2.23), p = 0.68), CRP, APACHE II score, and hospital stay.

Conclusions: Contrary to some published trials, our meta-analysis concludes that the use of probiotics in patients with SAP is not effective in reducing the mortality rate, septic complications, and need for operation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Przegla̜d Gastroenterologiczny
Przegla̜d Gastroenterologiczny GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
50
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Gastroenterology Review is a journal published each 2 months, aimed at gastroenterologists and general practitioners. Published under the patronage of Consultant in Gastroenterology and Polish Pancreatic Club.
期刊最新文献
Functional gastrointestinal disorders in Jordanian infants: a pilot study. Association between perineural infiltrations and delayed gastric emptying after Whipple procedure for periampullary tumours, and the relationship with other clinicopathological factors and overall survival. Assessment of the activity of the immune system in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases and asymptomatic COVID-19. SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients - does treatment for IBD negatively affect SARS-CoV-2 antibodies? A single-centre, prospective study. Inhibitory effect of stinging nettle (Urtica dioica L.) extract on body weight gain in rats on a high-fat diet.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1