{"title":"《冷冻鸡》的法律改革:新千年的家庭法改革?","authors":"R. Graycar","doi":"10.5040/9781472562746.ch-023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article considers some of the barriers to effective policy development in areas of law impacting on family relationships. First, the article draws attention to the narrow way in which the notion of 'family law' has been understood as involving only the law affecting marriage and divorce, whereas the law impacts on familial relationships in a much broader variety of ways. Next, it points out that powerful gendered discourses constrain how family law policies are debated and progressed. Despite that, the article draws a contrast between the significant progress that has been made in Australia in recognising gay and lesbian families, albeit in a functional rather than symbolic way. Unfortunately, the same cannot be said about heterosexual family law debates where important policy decisions have all too often been made on the basis of anecdotal information (such as stories about frozen 'chooks' (ie, chickens) rather than on the basis of evidence-based research.","PeriodicalId":46300,"journal":{"name":"Melbourne University Law Review","volume":"24 1","pages":"737"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2000-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"32","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Law Reform by Frozen Chook: Family Law Reform for the New Millennium?\",\"authors\":\"R. Graycar\",\"doi\":\"10.5040/9781472562746.ch-023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article considers some of the barriers to effective policy development in areas of law impacting on family relationships. First, the article draws attention to the narrow way in which the notion of 'family law' has been understood as involving only the law affecting marriage and divorce, whereas the law impacts on familial relationships in a much broader variety of ways. Next, it points out that powerful gendered discourses constrain how family law policies are debated and progressed. Despite that, the article draws a contrast between the significant progress that has been made in Australia in recognising gay and lesbian families, albeit in a functional rather than symbolic way. Unfortunately, the same cannot be said about heterosexual family law debates where important policy decisions have all too often been made on the basis of anecdotal information (such as stories about frozen 'chooks' (ie, chickens) rather than on the basis of evidence-based research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46300,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Melbourne University Law Review\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"737\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"32\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Melbourne University Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472562746.ch-023\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Melbourne University Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472562746.ch-023","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
Law Reform by Frozen Chook: Family Law Reform for the New Millennium?
This article considers some of the barriers to effective policy development in areas of law impacting on family relationships. First, the article draws attention to the narrow way in which the notion of 'family law' has been understood as involving only the law affecting marriage and divorce, whereas the law impacts on familial relationships in a much broader variety of ways. Next, it points out that powerful gendered discourses constrain how family law policies are debated and progressed. Despite that, the article draws a contrast between the significant progress that has been made in Australia in recognising gay and lesbian families, albeit in a functional rather than symbolic way. Unfortunately, the same cannot be said about heterosexual family law debates where important policy decisions have all too often been made on the basis of anecdotal information (such as stories about frozen 'chooks' (ie, chickens) rather than on the basis of evidence-based research.