吉利克诉西诺福克和威斯比奇地区卫生局。

L. Scarman, Lord Bridge OF Harwich, Lord Brandon OF Oakbrook, Lord Templeman
{"title":"吉利克诉西诺福克和威斯比奇地区卫生局。","authors":"L. Scarman, Lord Bridge OF Harwich, Lord Brandon OF Oakbrook, Lord Templeman","doi":"10.5040/9781782259800.ch-056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"England's Court of Appeal, Civil Division, ruled that parents had the right to prevent a physician at the local health authority from prescribing contraceptives to girls under the age of 16 without parental consent. Since a girl was legally incapable of giving valid consent in other matters before that age, neither could she give valid consent to contraception or abortion. A doctor who provided contraception or abortion treatment to a girl under 16, except in an emergency or with permission of the court, would infringe on the legal rights of the parents. An appeal was taken to the House of Lords.","PeriodicalId":82910,"journal":{"name":"The all England law reports","volume":"1985 1 1","pages":"533-59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1984-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"116","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority.\",\"authors\":\"L. Scarman, Lord Bridge OF Harwich, Lord Brandon OF Oakbrook, Lord Templeman\",\"doi\":\"10.5040/9781782259800.ch-056\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"England's Court of Appeal, Civil Division, ruled that parents had the right to prevent a physician at the local health authority from prescribing contraceptives to girls under the age of 16 without parental consent. Since a girl was legally incapable of giving valid consent in other matters before that age, neither could she give valid consent to contraception or abortion. A doctor who provided contraception or abortion treatment to a girl under 16, except in an emergency or with permission of the court, would infringe on the legal rights of the parents. An appeal was taken to the House of Lords.\",\"PeriodicalId\":82910,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The all England law reports\",\"volume\":\"1985 1 1\",\"pages\":\"533-59\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1984-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"116\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The all England law reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781782259800.ch-056\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The all England law reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781782259800.ch-056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 116

摘要

英格兰民事上诉法院裁定,父母有权阻止当地卫生当局的医生在未经父母同意的情况下为16岁以下的女孩开避孕药。由于女孩在法律上没有能力在该年龄之前对其他事项表示有效的同意,因此她也不能对避孕或堕胎表示有效的同意。医生向16岁以下女孩提供避孕或堕胎治疗,除非是在紧急情况下或得到法院许可,否则将侵犯父母的合法权利。上院收到了一份上诉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority.
England's Court of Appeal, Civil Division, ruled that parents had the right to prevent a physician at the local health authority from prescribing contraceptives to girls under the age of 16 without parental consent. Since a girl was legally incapable of giving valid consent in other matters before that age, neither could she give valid consent to contraception or abortion. A doctor who provided contraception or abortion treatment to a girl under 16, except in an emergency or with permission of the court, would infringe on the legal rights of the parents. An appeal was taken to the House of Lords.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
R (on the application of Quintavalle) v Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. R (on the application of Quintavalle) v Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. Evans v. Amicus Healthcare Ltd; Hadley v. Midland Fertility Ltd. Re R (a Child). R (on the application of Quintavalle) v Secretary of State for Health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1