城市转型授权过程中的可持续性评估:GeoBIM平台的元设计

Q1 Social Sciences Valori e Valutazioni Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.48264/vvsiev-20233210
Valerio Della Scala, Caterina Quaglio
{"title":"城市转型授权过程中的可持续性评估:GeoBIM平台的元设计","authors":"Valerio Della Scala, Caterina Quaglio","doi":"10.48264/vvsiev-20233210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The assessment criteria and indicators used in the authorisation processes of building or urban projects can play a key role in achieving the goals introduced by the UN 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Yet, on the one hand, the evaluation of project proposals and the granting of building permits still rely to a large extent on the subjective judgement of public technicians, severely limiting the incentive for the development of virtuous practices and innovative procedures; on the other hand, the measurement of the SDGs on a local basis presents strong operational gaps and criticalities, struggling to clearly orientate urban transformation processes. In the paper, these problematic issues represent the starting point to discuss the possibilities that the development of a GeoBIM platform could open to spatialise, measure and automate authorisation processes by integrating local regulations and sustainability indicators of global significance. The methodological and technical implications of the proposal are explored both through a reconstruction of the disciplinary literature on the subject and through the detailed description of some recent experimental tools. In particular, by questioning how to operationalize the integration of local assessment methods and global indicators through a GeoBIM platform, the paper raises broader questions on the relationship between measurement, policies and planning practices. In particular, the revision of priority criteria according to the 2030 Agenda goals is read in the text as a useful opportunity to rethink a number of administrative tools and practices. Indeed, the development of a GeoBIM platform to support building permit applications could not only make the assessment of compliance with local regulations more efficient and automated but also allow for the measurement of project impacts against indicators aimed at the local declination of the sustainability goals defined by the 2030 Agenda.","PeriodicalId":37741,"journal":{"name":"Valori e Valutazioni","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sustainability assessment in the authorisation process of urban transformation: the meta-design of a GeoBIM platform\",\"authors\":\"Valerio Della Scala, Caterina Quaglio\",\"doi\":\"10.48264/vvsiev-20233210\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The assessment criteria and indicators used in the authorisation processes of building or urban projects can play a key role in achieving the goals introduced by the UN 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Yet, on the one hand, the evaluation of project proposals and the granting of building permits still rely to a large extent on the subjective judgement of public technicians, severely limiting the incentive for the development of virtuous practices and innovative procedures; on the other hand, the measurement of the SDGs on a local basis presents strong operational gaps and criticalities, struggling to clearly orientate urban transformation processes. In the paper, these problematic issues represent the starting point to discuss the possibilities that the development of a GeoBIM platform could open to spatialise, measure and automate authorisation processes by integrating local regulations and sustainability indicators of global significance. The methodological and technical implications of the proposal are explored both through a reconstruction of the disciplinary literature on the subject and through the detailed description of some recent experimental tools. In particular, by questioning how to operationalize the integration of local assessment methods and global indicators through a GeoBIM platform, the paper raises broader questions on the relationship between measurement, policies and planning practices. In particular, the revision of priority criteria according to the 2030 Agenda goals is read in the text as a useful opportunity to rethink a number of administrative tools and practices. Indeed, the development of a GeoBIM platform to support building permit applications could not only make the assessment of compliance with local regulations more efficient and automated but also allow for the measurement of project impacts against indicators aimed at the local declination of the sustainability goals defined by the 2030 Agenda.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37741,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Valori e Valutazioni\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Valori e Valutazioni\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.48264/vvsiev-20233210\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Valori e Valutazioni","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48264/vvsiev-20233210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

建筑或城市项目授权过程中使用的评估标准和指标可以在实现联合国2030年可持续发展议程提出的目标方面发挥关键作用。然而,一方面,项目建议书的评估和建筑许可的发放在很大程度上仍然依赖于公共技术人员的主观判断,严重限制了良性做法和创新程序发展的动力;另一方面,在地方基础上衡量可持续发展目标存在很大的操作差距和关键性,难以明确定位城市转型进程。在本文中,这些问题代表了讨论开发GeoBIM平台的可能性的起点,该平台可以通过整合地方法规和具有全球意义的可持续性指标来实现授权过程的空间化、测量和自动化。通过对该主题的学科文献的重建和对一些最新实验工具的详细描述,探索了该建议的方法和技术含义。特别是,通过质疑如何通过GeoBIM平台实现地方评估方法和全球指标的整合,本文提出了有关测量、政策和规划实践之间关系的更广泛问题。特别是,根据《2030年议程》的目标修订优先标准,在案文中被视为重新思考若干行政工具和做法的有益机会。事实上,开发一个支持建筑许可证申请的GeoBIM平台,不仅可以提高对地方法规遵守情况的评估效率和自动化程度,还可以根据旨在实现《2030年议程》所确定的可持续发展目标的地方进展情况的指标来衡量项目影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sustainability assessment in the authorisation process of urban transformation: the meta-design of a GeoBIM platform
The assessment criteria and indicators used in the authorisation processes of building or urban projects can play a key role in achieving the goals introduced by the UN 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Yet, on the one hand, the evaluation of project proposals and the granting of building permits still rely to a large extent on the subjective judgement of public technicians, severely limiting the incentive for the development of virtuous practices and innovative procedures; on the other hand, the measurement of the SDGs on a local basis presents strong operational gaps and criticalities, struggling to clearly orientate urban transformation processes. In the paper, these problematic issues represent the starting point to discuss the possibilities that the development of a GeoBIM platform could open to spatialise, measure and automate authorisation processes by integrating local regulations and sustainability indicators of global significance. The methodological and technical implications of the proposal are explored both through a reconstruction of the disciplinary literature on the subject and through the detailed description of some recent experimental tools. In particular, by questioning how to operationalize the integration of local assessment methods and global indicators through a GeoBIM platform, the paper raises broader questions on the relationship between measurement, policies and planning practices. In particular, the revision of priority criteria according to the 2030 Agenda goals is read in the text as a useful opportunity to rethink a number of administrative tools and practices. Indeed, the development of a GeoBIM platform to support building permit applications could not only make the assessment of compliance with local regulations more efficient and automated but also allow for the measurement of project impacts against indicators aimed at the local declination of the sustainability goals defined by the 2030 Agenda.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Valori e Valutazioni
Valori e Valutazioni Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: La rivista ufficiale della SIEV si intitola “Valori e Valutazioni. Teorie ed esperienze”/“Valori e Valutazioni” is the official journal of the Italian Society of Property Evaluation and Investment Decision (SIEV).La rivista si propone di diffondere la cultura della valutazione nei seguenti campi tematici: • architettura, ingegneria civile, edile, dell’ambiente e del territorio, • pianificazione territoriale, urbanistica e ambientale; • investimenti pubblici e privati di natura immobiliare e infrastrutturale; • mercato immobiliare e produzione edilizia; • tutela, valorizzazione e gestione dei beni culturali e ambientali; • finanza immobiliare. A tal fine analizza originali problemi valutativi ed espone applicazioni metodologiche avanzate, alimentando il dibattito scientifico-culturale. Data la multidisciplinarietà dei temi trattati, la rivista si rivolge ad un pubblico molto ampio ed eterogeneo costituito da studiosi e ricercatori, professionisti, imprenditori, tecnici e funzionari della Pubblica Amministrazione.
期刊最新文献
Neural networks and linear models in real estate appraisal: the impact of sets selection procedures Towards a participatory energy transition. Critical issues and potentials of regulatory and financial instruments for Renewable Energy Communities (RECs) in Italy User evaluation of hospitals: service quality and hospitals’ physical obsolescence Valuto: an algorithm for the fair valuation of real estate market values Supporting decision-making processes in the assessment of water-related risks: a review of models and methods
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1