反政府武装的信誉困境:寻求国际社会和民众信任的新途径

Q4 Social Sciences Peace and Conflict Studies Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.46743/1082-7307/2021.1756
T. Bajon
{"title":"反政府武装的信誉困境:寻求国际社会和民众信任的新途径","authors":"T. Bajon","doi":"10.46743/1082-7307/2021.1756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"By being part into the theory of the rebels' credibility dilemma, this research takes its framework in a historical analysis of relations between rebel groups and governments, in order to better understand the mechanisms of demands and negotiations between these two actors. In this paper, we propose to test the validity of the theory of the rebels' credibility dilemma in Latin America, and to provide specific precision to this geographical area. For that, our approach proposes an historical and political study on data going from 1945 to 2019. The study is characterized by the creation of specific classifications and a relative power indicator of the rebel groups, making it possible to highlight new specificities of the rebels' credibility dilemma. The results show that globally the theory seems valid on the studied area, but that new parameters can be implemented to the initial theory, namely the search for popular and international credibility, through a general model of the rebels’ credibility dilemma.","PeriodicalId":52516,"journal":{"name":"Peace and Conflict Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The rebels' credibility dilemma: A new approach to the search for credibility towards the international community and the population\",\"authors\":\"T. Bajon\",\"doi\":\"10.46743/1082-7307/2021.1756\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"By being part into the theory of the rebels' credibility dilemma, this research takes its framework in a historical analysis of relations between rebel groups and governments, in order to better understand the mechanisms of demands and negotiations between these two actors. In this paper, we propose to test the validity of the theory of the rebels' credibility dilemma in Latin America, and to provide specific precision to this geographical area. For that, our approach proposes an historical and political study on data going from 1945 to 2019. The study is characterized by the creation of specific classifications and a relative power indicator of the rebel groups, making it possible to highlight new specificities of the rebels' credibility dilemma. The results show that globally the theory seems valid on the studied area, but that new parameters can be implemented to the initial theory, namely the search for popular and international credibility, through a general model of the rebels’ credibility dilemma.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Peace and Conflict Studies\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Peace and Conflict Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46743/1082-7307/2021.1756\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Peace and Conflict Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46743/1082-7307/2021.1756","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过纳入叛军信誉困境理论,本研究将其框架置于叛军组织与政府之间关系的历史分析中,以便更好地理解这两个行动者之间的需求和谈判机制。在本文中,我们建议在拉丁美洲检验叛军信誉困境理论的有效性,并为该地理区域提供特定的精度。为此,我们的方法建议对1945年至2019年的数据进行历史和政治研究。这项研究的特点是创建了具体的分类和反叛组织的相对权力指标,从而有可能突出反叛组织可信度困境的新特点。结果表明,该理论在整体上对研究区域是有效的,但可以通过反叛者可信度困境的一般模型对初始理论实施新的参数,即寻找大众和国际可信度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The rebels' credibility dilemma: A new approach to the search for credibility towards the international community and the population
By being part into the theory of the rebels' credibility dilemma, this research takes its framework in a historical analysis of relations between rebel groups and governments, in order to better understand the mechanisms of demands and negotiations between these two actors. In this paper, we propose to test the validity of the theory of the rebels' credibility dilemma in Latin America, and to provide specific precision to this geographical area. For that, our approach proposes an historical and political study on data going from 1945 to 2019. The study is characterized by the creation of specific classifications and a relative power indicator of the rebel groups, making it possible to highlight new specificities of the rebels' credibility dilemma. The results show that globally the theory seems valid on the studied area, but that new parameters can be implemented to the initial theory, namely the search for popular and international credibility, through a general model of the rebels’ credibility dilemma.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Peace and Conflict Studies
Peace and Conflict Studies Social Sciences-Safety Research
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
RMB Internationalization and Belt and Road Initiative with the Chinese approach to the RMB Inflow-Outflow Imbalance Refugees as Threats and Aid as Deterrence Tool: How Do Refugee Movements Affect Aid Allocation of European Donors? Internalization of Sustainable Development Goals by Local Governments: An Analysis on the Adoption and Diffusion of SDGs Policy Ethnic Inequality and Support for Democracy in Africa Postmodern War and the Politics of Speed
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1