阿根廷OMI-DOAS总臭氧柱与地面测量值的比较

IF 0.4 Q4 REMOTE SENSING Revista de Teledeteccion Pub Date : 2020-12-28 DOI:10.4995/raet.2020.13673
P. F. Orte, E. Luccini, E. Wolfram, F. Nollas, J. Pallotta, R. D’Elia, G. Carbajal, N. Mbatha, N. Hlongwane
{"title":"阿根廷OMI-DOAS总臭氧柱与地面测量值的比较","authors":"P. F. Orte, E. Luccini, E. Wolfram, F. Nollas, J. Pallotta, R. D’Elia, G. Carbajal, N. Mbatha, N. Hlongwane","doi":"10.4995/raet.2020.13673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Total ozone column (TOC) measurements through the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI/NASA EOSAura) are compared with ground-based observations made using Dobson and SAOZ instruments for the period 2004–2019 and 2008–02/2020, respectively. The OMI data were inverted using the Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy algorithm (overpass OMI-DOAS). The four ground-based sites used for the analysis are located in subpolar and subtropical latitudes spanning from 34°S to 54°S in the Southern Hemisphere, in the Argentine cities of Buenos Aires (34.58°S, 58.36°W; 25 m a.s.l.), Comodoro Rivadavia (45.86°S, 67.50°W; 46 m a.s.l.), Río Gallegos (51.60°S, 69.30°W; 72 m a.s.l.) and Ushuaia (54.80°S, 68.30°W; 14 m a.s.l.). The linear regression analyzes showed correlation values greater than 0.90 for all sites. The OMI measurements revealed an overestimation of less than 4 % with respect to the Dobson instruments, while the comparison with the SAOZ instrument presented a very low underestimation of less than 1 %.","PeriodicalId":43626,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Teledeteccion","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of OMI-DOAS total ozone column with ground-based measurements in Argentina\",\"authors\":\"P. F. Orte, E. Luccini, E. Wolfram, F. Nollas, J. Pallotta, R. D’Elia, G. Carbajal, N. Mbatha, N. Hlongwane\",\"doi\":\"10.4995/raet.2020.13673\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Total ozone column (TOC) measurements through the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI/NASA EOSAura) are compared with ground-based observations made using Dobson and SAOZ instruments for the period 2004–2019 and 2008–02/2020, respectively. The OMI data were inverted using the Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy algorithm (overpass OMI-DOAS). The four ground-based sites used for the analysis are located in subpolar and subtropical latitudes spanning from 34°S to 54°S in the Southern Hemisphere, in the Argentine cities of Buenos Aires (34.58°S, 58.36°W; 25 m a.s.l.), Comodoro Rivadavia (45.86°S, 67.50°W; 46 m a.s.l.), Río Gallegos (51.60°S, 69.30°W; 72 m a.s.l.) and Ushuaia (54.80°S, 68.30°W; 14 m a.s.l.). The linear regression analyzes showed correlation values greater than 0.90 for all sites. The OMI measurements revealed an overestimation of less than 4 % with respect to the Dobson instruments, while the comparison with the SAOZ instrument presented a very low underestimation of less than 1 %.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43626,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Teledeteccion\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Teledeteccion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4995/raet.2020.13673\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"REMOTE SENSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Teledeteccion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4995/raet.2020.13673","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REMOTE SENSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过臭氧监测仪器(OMI/NASA EOSAura)测量的总臭氧柱(TOC)分别与2004-2019年和2008-02/2020年期间使用多布森和SAOZ仪器进行的地面观测进行了比较。利用差分光学吸收光谱算法(overpass OMI- doas)反演OMI数据。用于分析的四个地面站点位于南半球34°S至54°S的亚极地和亚热带纬度,位于阿根廷城市布宜诺斯艾利斯(34.58°S, 58.36°W;25m a.s.l.), Comodoro Rivadavia(45.86°S, 67.50°W;46 m a.s.l.), Río Gallegos(51.60°S, 69.30°W;海拔72 m)和乌斯怀亚(54.80°S, 68.30°W;14 m a.s.l.)。线性回归分析显示,各位点的相关值均大于0.90。OMI测量结果显示,与Dobson仪器相比,高估不到4%,而与SAOZ仪器相比,低估的程度非常低,不到1%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of OMI-DOAS total ozone column with ground-based measurements in Argentina
Total ozone column (TOC) measurements through the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI/NASA EOSAura) are compared with ground-based observations made using Dobson and SAOZ instruments for the period 2004–2019 and 2008–02/2020, respectively. The OMI data were inverted using the Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy algorithm (overpass OMI-DOAS). The four ground-based sites used for the analysis are located in subpolar and subtropical latitudes spanning from 34°S to 54°S in the Southern Hemisphere, in the Argentine cities of Buenos Aires (34.58°S, 58.36°W; 25 m a.s.l.), Comodoro Rivadavia (45.86°S, 67.50°W; 46 m a.s.l.), Río Gallegos (51.60°S, 69.30°W; 72 m a.s.l.) and Ushuaia (54.80°S, 68.30°W; 14 m a.s.l.). The linear regression analyzes showed correlation values greater than 0.90 for all sites. The OMI measurements revealed an overestimation of less than 4 % with respect to the Dobson instruments, while the comparison with the SAOZ instrument presented a very low underestimation of less than 1 %.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista de Teledeteccion
Revista de Teledeteccion REMOTE SENSING-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
11
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Clasificación de uso y cobertura del suelo a través de algoritmos de aprendizaje automático: revisión bibliográfica Mapeo semiautomático de áreas quemadas en Chimborazo-Ecuador utilizando medias compuestas de dNBR con umbrales ajustados Análisis espacio-temporal de florecimientos algales nocivos en un lago-cráter tropical usando datos MODIS (2003-2020) Estimación de biomasa y carbono con herramientas de teledetección en bosques secos tropicales del Tolima, Colombia Calibration of volumetric soil moisture using Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2 satellite imagery by Google Earth Engine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1