最近3年意大利肿瘤药物的授权和报销时间表

M. Prada, M. Ruggeri, C. Sansone, Dalila De Fazio, A. Tettamanti, M. Mantovani
{"title":"最近3年意大利肿瘤药物的授权和报销时间表","authors":"M. Prada, M. Ruggeri, C. Sansone, Dalila De Fazio, A. Tettamanti, M. Mantovani","doi":"10.5301/maapoc.0000007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction The main purpose of this analysis was to quantify the time elapsed between the validation date of European Medicines Agency (EMA) centralized procedure and the first purchase of a product by at least 1 Italian health care structure, evaluating different variables that affect the process, the number of products approved by the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) that are available on the Italian market (July 2016), and the impact of the Cnn class for oncology drugs in Italy. Methods A panel of oncology products has been defined, which considered drugs approved by the EMA between January 2013 and December 2015, and authorized for the treatment of oncology diseases, excluding generics. Data were obtained via the EMA website by the Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco (AIFA; the Italian Medicine Agency) meeting reports, by official administrative acts of marketing authorization, and the date of the first purchase (first day of the first handling month). Results The mean time of EMA evaluation for the considered panel of medicines was about 441 days (standard deviation (SD) 108; range 266-770); the average approval time for AIFA was about 248 days (SD 131; range 85-688). Interestingly, the mean AIFA evaluation time decreased significantly from 264 days for products submitted to AIFA assessment in 2013-2014 to 219 days for products evaluated in 2015-2016. Focusing on the regional access, both the timing and the number of drugs available for patients were widely different from region to region. Discussion A reduction in the approval time in the last 2 years has been observed in Italy. However, several variables influence the efficiency of the process and need to be addressed to make the access to drugs timely and efficient.","PeriodicalId":74158,"journal":{"name":"Medicine access @ point of care","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5301/maapoc.0000007","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Timeline of Authorization and Reimbursement for Oncology Drugs in Italy in the Last 3 Years\",\"authors\":\"M. Prada, M. Ruggeri, C. Sansone, Dalila De Fazio, A. Tettamanti, M. Mantovani\",\"doi\":\"10.5301/maapoc.0000007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction The main purpose of this analysis was to quantify the time elapsed between the validation date of European Medicines Agency (EMA) centralized procedure and the first purchase of a product by at least 1 Italian health care structure, evaluating different variables that affect the process, the number of products approved by the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) that are available on the Italian market (July 2016), and the impact of the Cnn class for oncology drugs in Italy. Methods A panel of oncology products has been defined, which considered drugs approved by the EMA between January 2013 and December 2015, and authorized for the treatment of oncology diseases, excluding generics. Data were obtained via the EMA website by the Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco (AIFA; the Italian Medicine Agency) meeting reports, by official administrative acts of marketing authorization, and the date of the first purchase (first day of the first handling month). Results The mean time of EMA evaluation for the considered panel of medicines was about 441 days (standard deviation (SD) 108; range 266-770); the average approval time for AIFA was about 248 days (SD 131; range 85-688). Interestingly, the mean AIFA evaluation time decreased significantly from 264 days for products submitted to AIFA assessment in 2013-2014 to 219 days for products evaluated in 2015-2016. Focusing on the regional access, both the timing and the number of drugs available for patients were widely different from region to region. Discussion A reduction in the approval time in the last 2 years has been observed in Italy. However, several variables influence the efficiency of the process and need to be addressed to make the access to drugs timely and efficient.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicine access @ point of care\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5301/maapoc.0000007\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicine access @ point of care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5301/maapoc.0000007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine access @ point of care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5301/maapoc.0000007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

本分析的主要目的是量化从欧洲药品管理局(EMA)集中程序的验证日期到至少一个意大利医疗机构首次购买产品之间的时间,评估影响该过程的不同变量,意大利市场上可获得人用药品委员会(CHMP)批准的产品数量(2016年7月)。以及Cnn课堂对意大利肿瘤药物的影响。方法定义了一个肿瘤产品小组,该小组考虑了2013年1月至2015年12月EMA批准的用于治疗肿瘤疾病的药物,不包括仿制药。数据是由意大利农业机构(AIFA;意大利药品管理局)会议报告,经官方行政行为批准上市,以及首次购买日期(第一个办理月的第一天)。结果所考虑的药品组的EMA评价平均时间约为441 d(标准差(SD) 108;射程266 - 770);AIFA的平均审批时间约为248天(SD 131;范围85 - 688)。有趣的是,平均AIFA评估时间从2013-2014年提交AIFA评估的产品的264天显著减少到2015-2016年评估的产品的219天。在区域可及性方面,各地区患者可获得药物的时间和数量存在很大差异。在过去两年中,意大利的审批时间有所减少。然而,有几个变量影响到这一过程的效率,需要加以解决,以便及时和有效地获得药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Timeline of Authorization and Reimbursement for Oncology Drugs in Italy in the Last 3 Years
Introduction The main purpose of this analysis was to quantify the time elapsed between the validation date of European Medicines Agency (EMA) centralized procedure and the first purchase of a product by at least 1 Italian health care structure, evaluating different variables that affect the process, the number of products approved by the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) that are available on the Italian market (July 2016), and the impact of the Cnn class for oncology drugs in Italy. Methods A panel of oncology products has been defined, which considered drugs approved by the EMA between January 2013 and December 2015, and authorized for the treatment of oncology diseases, excluding generics. Data were obtained via the EMA website by the Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco (AIFA; the Italian Medicine Agency) meeting reports, by official administrative acts of marketing authorization, and the date of the first purchase (first day of the first handling month). Results The mean time of EMA evaluation for the considered panel of medicines was about 441 days (standard deviation (SD) 108; range 266-770); the average approval time for AIFA was about 248 days (SD 131; range 85-688). Interestingly, the mean AIFA evaluation time decreased significantly from 264 days for products submitted to AIFA assessment in 2013-2014 to 219 days for products evaluated in 2015-2016. Focusing on the regional access, both the timing and the number of drugs available for patients were widely different from region to region. Discussion A reduction in the approval time in the last 2 years has been observed in Italy. However, several variables influence the efficiency of the process and need to be addressed to make the access to drugs timely and efficient.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
A structural equation modeling of supply chain strategies for artemisinin-based combination therapies in Uganda. Antibiotic consumption at community pharmacies: A multicenter repeated prevalence surveillance using WHO methodology. Assessment of proton-pump inhibitor use at a tertiary teaching hospital in Nigeria. Point-of-care high-sensitivity assay on PATHFAST as the backup in the emergency room. Medicine quality in high-income countries: The obstacles to comparative prevalence studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1