Cinthia Hernández, Kenneth Madrigal, Carlos Flores
{"title":"强化物类型对操作性反应更新的影响","authors":"Cinthia Hernández, Kenneth Madrigal, Carlos Flores","doi":"10.46867/IJCP.2018.31.00.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Author(s): Hernandez, Cinthia; Madrigal, Kenneth; Flores, Carlos | Abstract: Some studies have identified that ABA renewal seems to depend on how response-reinforcer contingency is established. Using rats as subjects, the present study assessed ABA and ABB renewal using a two-component multiple schedule (VI30 s - VI30 s) each with a different reinforcer (pellets or sucrose). 16 subjects were trained to lever-press during 20 sessions in Context A; lever-pressing was extinguished during 10 sessions in Context B. And for the renewal test, 8 subjects were tested in Context A (Group ABA); whereas, the rest were tested in Context B (Group ABB). During acquisition, response rates were higher on the pellets component than the sucrose component; during extinction, response rates decreased to near-zero responses. A renewal effect was observed only for Group ABA during test, showing no differences between components. Our results suggest that different type of reinforcers do not seem to affect ABA renewal, using different contexts allows for renewal to be observed regardless of the differences in response rates during acquisition.","PeriodicalId":39712,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Comparative Psychology","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of the type of reinforcer on renewal of operant responding\",\"authors\":\"Cinthia Hernández, Kenneth Madrigal, Carlos Flores\",\"doi\":\"10.46867/IJCP.2018.31.00.03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Author(s): Hernandez, Cinthia; Madrigal, Kenneth; Flores, Carlos | Abstract: Some studies have identified that ABA renewal seems to depend on how response-reinforcer contingency is established. Using rats as subjects, the present study assessed ABA and ABB renewal using a two-component multiple schedule (VI30 s - VI30 s) each with a different reinforcer (pellets or sucrose). 16 subjects were trained to lever-press during 20 sessions in Context A; lever-pressing was extinguished during 10 sessions in Context B. And for the renewal test, 8 subjects were tested in Context A (Group ABA); whereas, the rest were tested in Context B (Group ABB). During acquisition, response rates were higher on the pellets component than the sucrose component; during extinction, response rates decreased to near-zero responses. A renewal effect was observed only for Group ABA during test, showing no differences between components. Our results suggest that different type of reinforcers do not seem to affect ABA renewal, using different contexts allows for renewal to be observed regardless of the differences in response rates during acquisition.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39712,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Comparative Psychology\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Comparative Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46867/IJCP.2018.31.00.03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Comparative Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46867/IJCP.2018.31.00.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
作者:Hernandez, cynthia;情歌,肯尼斯;摘要一些研究发现,ABA的更新似乎取决于应答-强化偶然性的建立方式。本研究以大鼠为研究对象,采用双组分复合方案(VI30 s - VI30 s)评估ABA和ABB的更新,每种方案使用不同的强化剂(颗粒或蔗糖)。在情境A的20次训练中,16名受试者接受了杠杆按压训练;在情境b中,压杆动作在10个回合中消失,在情境A (ABA组)中,8名被试进行更新测试;其余在情境B (ABB组)中进行测试。在采集过程中,颗粒组分的响应率高于蔗糖组分;在灭绝期间,反应率下降到接近零的反应。在试验过程中,仅ABA组有更新作用,各组间无差异。我们的研究结果表明,不同类型的强化物似乎不影响ABA更新,使用不同的环境允许在获取过程中观察到更新,而不管反应率的差异。
Effects of the type of reinforcer on renewal of operant responding
Author(s): Hernandez, Cinthia; Madrigal, Kenneth; Flores, Carlos | Abstract: Some studies have identified that ABA renewal seems to depend on how response-reinforcer contingency is established. Using rats as subjects, the present study assessed ABA and ABB renewal using a two-component multiple schedule (VI30 s - VI30 s) each with a different reinforcer (pellets or sucrose). 16 subjects were trained to lever-press during 20 sessions in Context A; lever-pressing was extinguished during 10 sessions in Context B. And for the renewal test, 8 subjects were tested in Context A (Group ABA); whereas, the rest were tested in Context B (Group ABB). During acquisition, response rates were higher on the pellets component than the sucrose component; during extinction, response rates decreased to near-zero responses. A renewal effect was observed only for Group ABA during test, showing no differences between components. Our results suggest that different type of reinforcers do not seem to affect ABA renewal, using different contexts allows for renewal to be observed regardless of the differences in response rates during acquisition.