{"title":"重新审视分析法学与描述社会学","authors":"N. Lacey","doi":"10.4324/9781315091891-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Discusses the claims made by H.L.A. Hart that his book \"The Concept of Law\" might be regarded as a contribution not only to analytical jurisprudence but also to descriptive sociology. Interpretation and limit of Hart's claims; Relationship between Hart's idea on the connection of legal theory with both analytical jurisprudence and descriptive sociology; Analysis of several case studies within special jurisprudence.","PeriodicalId":47670,"journal":{"name":"Texas Law Review","volume":"84 1","pages":"111-148"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2006-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"28","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analytical jurisprudence versus descriptive sociology revisited\",\"authors\":\"N. Lacey\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9781315091891-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Discusses the claims made by H.L.A. Hart that his book \\\"The Concept of Law\\\" might be regarded as a contribution not only to analytical jurisprudence but also to descriptive sociology. Interpretation and limit of Hart's claims; Relationship between Hart's idea on the connection of legal theory with both analytical jurisprudence and descriptive sociology; Analysis of several case studies within special jurisprudence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47670,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Texas Law Review\",\"volume\":\"84 1\",\"pages\":\"111-148\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"28\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Texas Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315091891-5\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Texas Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315091891-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
Analytical jurisprudence versus descriptive sociology revisited
Discusses the claims made by H.L.A. Hart that his book "The Concept of Law" might be regarded as a contribution not only to analytical jurisprudence but also to descriptive sociology. Interpretation and limit of Hart's claims; Relationship between Hart's idea on the connection of legal theory with both analytical jurisprudence and descriptive sociology; Analysis of several case studies within special jurisprudence.
期刊介绍：
The Texas Law Review is a national and international leader in legal scholarship. Texas Law Review is an independent journal, edited and published entirely by students at the University of Texas School of Law. Our seven issues per year contain articles by professors, judges, and practitioners; reviews of important recent books from recognized experts, essays, commentaries; and student written notes. Texas Law Review is currently the ninth most cited legal periodical in federal and state cases in the United States and the thirteenth most cited by legal journals.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
