土耳其军队护生运动利益/障碍量表的效度和信度

IF 0.5 4区 教育学 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY South African Journal for Research in Sport Physical Education and Recreation Pub Date : 2010-01-01 DOI:10.4314/SAJRS.V32I2.59297
Tulay Ortabag, S. Ceylan, A. Akyuz, H. Bebiş
{"title":"土耳其军队护生运动利益/障碍量表的效度和信度","authors":"Tulay Ortabag, S. Ceylan, A. Akyuz, H. Bebiş","doi":"10.4314/SAJRS.V32I2.59297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to test the validity and reliability of the Exercise Benefits/Barriers Scale (EBBS) for female university students in Turkey. This is a validity and reliability study of the EBBS for use in a Turkish context. The study sample consisted of 409 students of a School of Nursing (97.1% of the total student body). In the study, a three-part questionnaire was used. The EBBS, developed by Sechrist (Sechrist et al., 1987), was used in the study in order to determine the participants’ benefitbarrier perceptions. The EBBS validity coefficient was found to be 0.87 (re-test =0.85) for the whole scale, 0.95 (re-test=0.94) for the benefit aspect and, 0.80 (retest= 0.79) for the barrier aspect. “Physical performance” and “preventive health” were given the highest scores by the participants within the EBBS’s benefit subscales. The exercise barrier subscale with the lowest score was “exercise milieu”. Determining the benefits of and barriers to exercise, by using a standardized scale, plays an important role in maintaining proper levels of physical activity. The Turkish translation of the EBBS model has shown it to be an effective tool for measuring physical activity among female Turkish university students. Key words:  Adolescent health; Exercise; Health behaviours; Physical activity.","PeriodicalId":45543,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal for Research in Sport Physical Education and Recreation","volume":"32 1","pages":"55-70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"34","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The validity and reliability of the exercise benefits/barriers scale for Turkish Military nursing students\",\"authors\":\"Tulay Ortabag, S. Ceylan, A. Akyuz, H. Bebiş\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/SAJRS.V32I2.59297\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to test the validity and reliability of the Exercise Benefits/Barriers Scale (EBBS) for female university students in Turkey. This is a validity and reliability study of the EBBS for use in a Turkish context. The study sample consisted of 409 students of a School of Nursing (97.1% of the total student body). In the study, a three-part questionnaire was used. The EBBS, developed by Sechrist (Sechrist et al., 1987), was used in the study in order to determine the participants’ benefitbarrier perceptions. The EBBS validity coefficient was found to be 0.87 (re-test =0.85) for the whole scale, 0.95 (re-test=0.94) for the benefit aspect and, 0.80 (retest= 0.79) for the barrier aspect. “Physical performance” and “preventive health” were given the highest scores by the participants within the EBBS’s benefit subscales. The exercise barrier subscale with the lowest score was “exercise milieu”. Determining the benefits of and barriers to exercise, by using a standardized scale, plays an important role in maintaining proper levels of physical activity. The Turkish translation of the EBBS model has shown it to be an effective tool for measuring physical activity among female Turkish university students. Key words:  Adolescent health; Exercise; Health behaviours; Physical activity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45543,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South African Journal for Research in Sport Physical Education and Recreation\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"55-70\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"34\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South African Journal for Research in Sport Physical Education and Recreation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/SAJRS.V32I2.59297\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal for Research in Sport Physical Education and Recreation","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/SAJRS.V32I2.59297","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 34

摘要

本研究旨在检验土耳其女大学生运动益处/障碍量表(EBBS)的效度和信度。这是一个在土耳其语境中使用EBBS的效度和可靠性研究。研究样本为某护理学院409名学生(占学生总数的97.1%)。在研究中,使用了三部分的问卷调查。研究中使用了由secchriist (secchriist et al., 1987)开发的EBBS,以确定参与者的利益障碍感知。整体量表的EBBS效度系数为0.87(重测=0.85),效益量表效度系数为0.95(重测=0.94),障碍量表效度系数为0.80(重测= 0.79)。在EBBS的利益子量表中,参与者给“身体表现”和“预防健康”打了最高分。得分最低的运动障碍分量表为“运动环境”。通过使用标准化量表来确定运动的益处和障碍,对于保持适当的身体活动水平起着重要作用。EBBS模型的土耳其语翻译表明,它是衡量土耳其女大学生体育活动的有效工具。关键词:青少年健康;锻炼;健康行为;体力活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The validity and reliability of the exercise benefits/barriers scale for Turkish Military nursing students
This study aims to test the validity and reliability of the Exercise Benefits/Barriers Scale (EBBS) for female university students in Turkey. This is a validity and reliability study of the EBBS for use in a Turkish context. The study sample consisted of 409 students of a School of Nursing (97.1% of the total student body). In the study, a three-part questionnaire was used. The EBBS, developed by Sechrist (Sechrist et al., 1987), was used in the study in order to determine the participants’ benefitbarrier perceptions. The EBBS validity coefficient was found to be 0.87 (re-test =0.85) for the whole scale, 0.95 (re-test=0.94) for the benefit aspect and, 0.80 (retest= 0.79) for the barrier aspect. “Physical performance” and “preventive health” were given the highest scores by the participants within the EBBS’s benefit subscales. The exercise barrier subscale with the lowest score was “exercise milieu”. Determining the benefits of and barriers to exercise, by using a standardized scale, plays an important role in maintaining proper levels of physical activity. The Turkish translation of the EBBS model has shown it to be an effective tool for measuring physical activity among female Turkish university students. Key words:  Adolescent health; Exercise; Health behaviours; Physical activity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊介绍: The South African Journal for Research in Sport, Physical education and Recreation (SAJRSPER) is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes original research articles, systematic reviews, commentaries, and letters on topics related to Sport and Exercise science, Physical education and Recreation. This includes research of topics such as bio-mechanics, motor control, sport injuries and rehabilitation, clinical exercise interventions, physical education, as well as outdoor and recreation related topics. Material that is particularly unique and relevant to the subject content at an international and national level would be considered.
期刊最新文献
Fitspiration-effect: Fitness identity of emerging adult females on social media Effect of aquatic therapy on motor skill and executive function in children with Autism Spectrum Disorder Patterns of participation in active recreation and leisure boredom among university students Rock climbers: Deliberate or precautionary risk takers in relation to sensation-seeking Perspective taking as a predictor of burnout among competitive adolescent squash players
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1