校园反种族主义规则:冲突中的宪法叙事

IF 2 2区 社会学 Q1 LAW Northwestern University Law Review Pub Date : 1991-01-01 DOI:10.4324/9781315633732-26
R. Delgado
{"title":"校园反种族主义规则:冲突中的宪法叙事","authors":"R. Delgado","doi":"10.4324/9781315633732-26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Argues that the debate about hate speech can be approached, with equal justification, from two perspectives -- from either an equality or free speech standpoint, depending on the values that one favors and the historical narrative that rings most true to one's experience. Observes that the concerted nature of racist hate speech creates a picture of changed social reality that seriously damages the prospects and feelings of persons of color.","PeriodicalId":47587,"journal":{"name":"Northwestern University Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"29","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Campus Antiracism Rules: Constitutional Narratives in Collision\",\"authors\":\"R. Delgado\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9781315633732-26\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Argues that the debate about hate speech can be approached, with equal justification, from two perspectives -- from either an equality or free speech standpoint, depending on the values that one favors and the historical narrative that rings most true to one's experience. Observes that the concerted nature of racist hate speech creates a picture of changed social reality that seriously damages the prospects and feelings of persons of color.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47587,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Northwestern University Law Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1991-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"29\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Northwestern University Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315633732-26\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Northwestern University Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315633732-26","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

摘要

他认为,关于仇恨言论的辩论可以从两个角度进行,理由都一样——从平等或言论自由的角度出发,这取决于一个人喜欢的价值观和最符合自己经历的历史叙述。注意到种族主义仇恨言论的一致性质造成了一幅社会现实已发生变化的画面,严重损害了有色人种的前途和感情。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Campus Antiracism Rules: Constitutional Narratives in Collision
Argues that the debate about hate speech can be approached, with equal justification, from two perspectives -- from either an equality or free speech standpoint, depending on the values that one favors and the historical narrative that rings most true to one's experience. Observes that the concerted nature of racist hate speech creates a picture of changed social reality that seriously damages the prospects and feelings of persons of color.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
10.50%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Northwestern University Law Review is a student-operated journal that publishes four issues of high-quality, general legal scholarship each year. Student editors make the editorial and organizational decisions and select articles submitted by professors, judges, and practitioners, as well as student pieces.
期刊最新文献
From the Spirit of the Federalist Papers to the End of Legitimacy: Reflections on Gundy V. United States A New Strategy for Regulating Arbitration Contract Governance in Small-World Networks: The Case of the Maghribi Traders Reconstituting We the People: Frederick Douglass and Jurgen Habermas in Conversation The Discriminatory Effects of the HUD Smoke-Free Policy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1