经济实验中墨守成规的社会影响

Shaun P. Hargreaves Heap
{"title":"经济实验中墨守成规的社会影响","authors":"Shaun P. Hargreaves Heap","doi":"10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2014-22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper reviews some of the economic experimental evidence on conformism. There is nothing to match the early psychology experiments where subjects were often swayed by the behaviour of others to an extraordinary degree, but there is plenty of evidence of conformism. This seems built-in to our sociality either because we have preferences for conversation or status which are activated by the knowledge of what others do, or because other people face relevantly similar decisions to our own and so that their behaviour signals something useful to us about the uncertain world. These social influences can cause mischief. The more worrying cases, however, are those where individual preferences themselves change through interaction with others: the strongest experimental evidence for this is with respect to individual social preferences, particularly in a context where individuals belong to different groups.","PeriodicalId":53338,"journal":{"name":"Economics-The Open Access Open-Assessment E-Journal","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2014-22","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social Influences towards Conformism in Economic Experiments\",\"authors\":\"Shaun P. Hargreaves Heap\",\"doi\":\"10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2014-22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This paper reviews some of the economic experimental evidence on conformism. There is nothing to match the early psychology experiments where subjects were often swayed by the behaviour of others to an extraordinary degree, but there is plenty of evidence of conformism. This seems built-in to our sociality either because we have preferences for conversation or status which are activated by the knowledge of what others do, or because other people face relevantly similar decisions to our own and so that their behaviour signals something useful to us about the uncertain world. These social influences can cause mischief. The more worrying cases, however, are those where individual preferences themselves change through interaction with others: the strongest experimental evidence for this is with respect to individual social preferences, particularly in a context where individuals belong to different groups.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53338,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economics-The Open Access Open-Assessment E-Journal\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2014-22\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economics-The Open Access Open-Assessment E-Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2014-22\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics-The Open Access Open-Assessment E-Journal","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2014-22","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

摘要本文综述了一些关于从众的经济学实验证据。在早期的心理学实验中,实验对象经常被他人的行为影响到非常大的程度,没有什么能与之相提并论,但有大量的证据表明,墨守成规。这似乎是我们的社会性所固有的,要么是因为我们对谈话或地位有偏好,这些偏好是由了解他人的行为而激活的,要么是因为其他人面临着与我们相似的决定,因此他们的行为向我们发出了关于不确定世界的有用信号。这些社会影响会造成危害。然而,更令人担忧的是那些个人偏好本身通过与他人的互动而改变的案例:最有力的实验证据是关于个人的社会偏好,特别是在个人属于不同群体的背景下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Social Influences towards Conformism in Economic Experiments
Abstract This paper reviews some of the economic experimental evidence on conformism. There is nothing to match the early psychology experiments where subjects were often swayed by the behaviour of others to an extraordinary degree, but there is plenty of evidence of conformism. This seems built-in to our sociality either because we have preferences for conversation or status which are activated by the knowledge of what others do, or because other people face relevantly similar decisions to our own and so that their behaviour signals something useful to us about the uncertain world. These social influences can cause mischief. The more worrying cases, however, are those where individual preferences themselves change through interaction with others: the strongest experimental evidence for this is with respect to individual social preferences, particularly in a context where individuals belong to different groups.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Economics-The Open Access Open-Assessment E-Journal
Economics-The Open Access Open-Assessment E-Journal Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Micro-Credit on Rural Households’ Income in the Case of Sinana District, Bale Zone, Oromia National Regional State, Ethiopia Reinvestigating the U.S. Consumption Function: A Nonlinear Autoregressive Distributed Lags Approach Path Constitution: Building Organizational Resilience for Sustainable Performance Organizational Integration, Knowledge Management, and Sustainable Entrepreneurship for SMEs in Developing Economies Profit efficiency of banks in Colombia with undesirable output: a directional distance function approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1