《在祖科蒂公园之外》,作者罗恩·希夫曼

M. Wade
{"title":"《在祖科蒂公园之外》,作者罗恩·希夫曼","authors":"M. Wade","doi":"10.5070/bp326117525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Beyond Zuccotti Park: Freedom of Assembly and the Occupation of Public Space Eds. Ron Schiffman, Rick Bell, Lance Jay Brown, and Lynne Elizabeth New Village Press, 2012 Reviewed by Matt Wade The occupation of Zuccotti Park and the Occupy Wall Street Movement inspired a flurry of ideas and excitement, and led to a cacophony of debates about public space, protest, and the meaning of the movement. A year later, our tents long stashed away, many of us imagined that the conversation was closed. Instead, just a year after OWS led to public encampments in cities across the US, Beyond Zuccotti Park provides a fantastic collection of celebrations and criticisms of OWS. This collection of essays includes contributions from notable academics, activists, city officials, social service professionals, and design practitioners. The diversity of authors mirrors the broad range of debates that the movement inspired, and the pieces in the volume address themes ranging from public space and democracy, to New York’s privately owned public spaces, to populist design. The contributions at the beginning of the book focus on the occupation of public space and the rise of an occupation movement in cities across the globe. Occupation is itself an ambiguous term, with progressive as well as colonial implications. Some authors celebrate the transformative experience of the occupation of Zuccotti Park and the community that was produced by addressing the challenges of an ad hoc habitation, including the provision of food and latrines and engineering bike-powered energy sources. Other authors reflect upon the meaning and symbols of occupation. Jeffrey Hou 1 examines the distinction between the politics of what he terms “institutional public space” and “insurgent public space,” suggesting that transformative actions result from the appropriation of space beyond the intent of its design or beyond the boundaries of the appropriate. Saskia Sassen further argues that the occupy movement constitutes what she calls the “global street,” a critical “part of our global modernity” that has arisen in the age of global finance, as a tool for the voiceless to make demands upon power. Finally, some critical pieces question the occupation of the center, the financial district and symbolic hub of global capitalist power. These authors contend that even this radical space contains racial coding, 1. Volume 25 of the Berkeley Planning Journal features a review of Jeffrey Hou’s Insurgent Public Space: Guerilla Urbanism and the Remaking of Contemporary Cities. This review is available at: http://escholarship.org/uc/item/5990f284","PeriodicalId":39937,"journal":{"name":"Berkeley Planning Journal","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5070/bp326117525","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond Zuccotti Park, by Ron Shiffman\",\"authors\":\"M. Wade\",\"doi\":\"10.5070/bp326117525\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Beyond Zuccotti Park: Freedom of Assembly and the Occupation of Public Space Eds. Ron Schiffman, Rick Bell, Lance Jay Brown, and Lynne Elizabeth New Village Press, 2012 Reviewed by Matt Wade The occupation of Zuccotti Park and the Occupy Wall Street Movement inspired a flurry of ideas and excitement, and led to a cacophony of debates about public space, protest, and the meaning of the movement. A year later, our tents long stashed away, many of us imagined that the conversation was closed. Instead, just a year after OWS led to public encampments in cities across the US, Beyond Zuccotti Park provides a fantastic collection of celebrations and criticisms of OWS. This collection of essays includes contributions from notable academics, activists, city officials, social service professionals, and design practitioners. The diversity of authors mirrors the broad range of debates that the movement inspired, and the pieces in the volume address themes ranging from public space and democracy, to New York’s privately owned public spaces, to populist design. The contributions at the beginning of the book focus on the occupation of public space and the rise of an occupation movement in cities across the globe. Occupation is itself an ambiguous term, with progressive as well as colonial implications. Some authors celebrate the transformative experience of the occupation of Zuccotti Park and the community that was produced by addressing the challenges of an ad hoc habitation, including the provision of food and latrines and engineering bike-powered energy sources. Other authors reflect upon the meaning and symbols of occupation. Jeffrey Hou 1 examines the distinction between the politics of what he terms “institutional public space” and “insurgent public space,” suggesting that transformative actions result from the appropriation of space beyond the intent of its design or beyond the boundaries of the appropriate. Saskia Sassen further argues that the occupy movement constitutes what she calls the “global street,” a critical “part of our global modernity” that has arisen in the age of global finance, as a tool for the voiceless to make demands upon power. Finally, some critical pieces question the occupation of the center, the financial district and symbolic hub of global capitalist power. These authors contend that even this radical space contains racial coding, 1. Volume 25 of the Berkeley Planning Journal features a review of Jeffrey Hou’s Insurgent Public Space: Guerilla Urbanism and the Remaking of Contemporary Cities. This review is available at: http://escholarship.org/uc/item/5990f284\",\"PeriodicalId\":39937,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Berkeley Planning Journal\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5070/bp326117525\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Berkeley Planning Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5070/bp326117525\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Berkeley Planning Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5070/bp326117525","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

超越祖科蒂公园:集会自由与公共空间的占领。对祖科蒂公园的占领和占领华尔街运动激发了一系列的想法和兴奋,并导致了关于公共空间、抗议和运动意义的激烈辩论。一年后,我们的帐篷早已藏了起来,我们中的许多人以为对话已经结束了。相反,就在占领华尔街运动在美国各城市引发公众扎营的一年之后,“超越祖科蒂公园”提供了一系列对占领华尔街运动的庆祝和批评。这本文集包括来自著名学者、活动家、城市官员、社会服务专业人士和设计从业者的贡献。作者的多样性反映了这场运动所激发的广泛辩论,本书中的作品涉及的主题从公共空间和民主,到纽约的私人公共空间,再到民粹主义设计。本书开头的贡献集中在公共空间的占领和全球城市中占领运动的兴起。占领本身就是一个模棱两可的术语,既有进步的含义,也有殖民的含义。一些作者赞扬了占领Zuccotti公园和社区的变革经验,这些经历是通过解决临时住所的挑战而产生的,包括提供食物和厕所以及工程自行车供电的能源。其他作者反思了职业的意义和象征。Jeffrey Hou 1研究了他所说的“制度性公共空间”和“反叛性公共空间”之间的政治区别,表明变革行为源于超出其设计意图或超出适当界限的空间占用。Saskia Sassen进一步认为,占领运动构成了她所谓的“全球街头”,是全球金融时代兴起的“我们全球现代性的关键部分”,是无声者向权力提出要求的工具。最后,一些批判性的文章质疑对中心、金融区和全球资本主义权力的象征性枢纽的占领。这些作者认为,即使是这个激进的空间也包含种族编码。《伯克利规划杂志》第25卷对Jeffrey Hou的《反叛的公共空间:游击城市主义和当代城市的重塑》进行了评论。该评论可在http://escholarship.org/uc/item/5990f284上获得
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Beyond Zuccotti Park, by Ron Shiffman
Beyond Zuccotti Park: Freedom of Assembly and the Occupation of Public Space Eds. Ron Schiffman, Rick Bell, Lance Jay Brown, and Lynne Elizabeth New Village Press, 2012 Reviewed by Matt Wade The occupation of Zuccotti Park and the Occupy Wall Street Movement inspired a flurry of ideas and excitement, and led to a cacophony of debates about public space, protest, and the meaning of the movement. A year later, our tents long stashed away, many of us imagined that the conversation was closed. Instead, just a year after OWS led to public encampments in cities across the US, Beyond Zuccotti Park provides a fantastic collection of celebrations and criticisms of OWS. This collection of essays includes contributions from notable academics, activists, city officials, social service professionals, and design practitioners. The diversity of authors mirrors the broad range of debates that the movement inspired, and the pieces in the volume address themes ranging from public space and democracy, to New York’s privately owned public spaces, to populist design. The contributions at the beginning of the book focus on the occupation of public space and the rise of an occupation movement in cities across the globe. Occupation is itself an ambiguous term, with progressive as well as colonial implications. Some authors celebrate the transformative experience of the occupation of Zuccotti Park and the community that was produced by addressing the challenges of an ad hoc habitation, including the provision of food and latrines and engineering bike-powered energy sources. Other authors reflect upon the meaning and symbols of occupation. Jeffrey Hou 1 examines the distinction between the politics of what he terms “institutional public space” and “insurgent public space,” suggesting that transformative actions result from the appropriation of space beyond the intent of its design or beyond the boundaries of the appropriate. Saskia Sassen further argues that the occupy movement constitutes what she calls the “global street,” a critical “part of our global modernity” that has arisen in the age of global finance, as a tool for the voiceless to make demands upon power. Finally, some critical pieces question the occupation of the center, the financial district and symbolic hub of global capitalist power. These authors contend that even this radical space contains racial coding, 1. Volume 25 of the Berkeley Planning Journal features a review of Jeffrey Hou’s Insurgent Public Space: Guerilla Urbanism and the Remaking of Contemporary Cities. This review is available at: http://escholarship.org/uc/item/5990f284
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Berkeley Planning Journal
Berkeley Planning Journal Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊介绍: The Berkeley Planning Journal is an annual peer-reviewed journal, published by graduate students in the Department of City and Regional Planning (DCRP) at the University of California, Berkeley since 1985.
期刊最新文献
Learning to Share: Outdoor Commercial Spaces on San Francisco's Valencia Street Decolonising Myself: Navigating the Researcher-Activist Identity in the Urban South Pacific COVID-19 and the Future of Urban Life How to Save Chinatown: Preserving affordability and community service through ethnic retail Urban Bites and Agrarian Bytes: Digital Agriculture and Extended Urbanization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1