covid -19期间和之后的失败的坚定防御:政策和所需的证据

Q4 Social Sciences Competition Law Journal Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.4337/clj.2022.01.01
John F. Bruce, Matt Hughes, Gemma Smith
{"title":"covid -19期间和之后的失败的坚定防御:政策和所需的证据","authors":"John F. Bruce, Matt Hughes, Gemma Smith","doi":"10.4337/clj.2022.01.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Governments in developed countries have responded to the COVID-19 pandemic with an almost unprecedented level of government support, thereby preserving many firms and jobs. However, this government support will be progressively withdrawn, and coupled with recent, and expected further, increases in interest rates and the market impacts associated with changes in consumers’ and firms’ behaviour, there is likely to be restructuring in many sectors. This raises the public policy question as to the appropriate balance between government support facilitating and ameliorating this restructuring and the role played by merger control, including how the COVID-19 pandemic and its aftermath affects the application of the so-called ‘failing’ or ‘exiting’ firm defence or scenario under UK and EU merger control. To consider these questions, this article: addresses the policy considerations underpinning the failing firm defence under UK and EU merger control;describes the extensive government support and State aid provided in the UK in response to COVID-19 and the impact of COVID-19 on various sectors;and provides an overview of the evidence required for the ‘failing firm defence’, given these policy and factual considerations. © 2022 Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.","PeriodicalId":36415,"journal":{"name":"Competition Law Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The failing firm defence during and post-COVID-19: policy and the evidence required\",\"authors\":\"John F. Bruce, Matt Hughes, Gemma Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.4337/clj.2022.01.01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Governments in developed countries have responded to the COVID-19 pandemic with an almost unprecedented level of government support, thereby preserving many firms and jobs. However, this government support will be progressively withdrawn, and coupled with recent, and expected further, increases in interest rates and the market impacts associated with changes in consumers’ and firms’ behaviour, there is likely to be restructuring in many sectors. This raises the public policy question as to the appropriate balance between government support facilitating and ameliorating this restructuring and the role played by merger control, including how the COVID-19 pandemic and its aftermath affects the application of the so-called ‘failing’ or ‘exiting’ firm defence or scenario under UK and EU merger control. To consider these questions, this article: addresses the policy considerations underpinning the failing firm defence under UK and EU merger control;describes the extensive government support and State aid provided in the UK in response to COVID-19 and the impact of COVID-19 on various sectors;and provides an overview of the evidence required for the ‘failing firm defence’, given these policy and factual considerations. © 2022 Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36415,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Competition Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Competition Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4337/clj.2022.01.01\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Competition Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/clj.2022.01.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

发达国家政府以几乎前所未有的政府支持水平应对COVID-19大流行,从而保留了许多公司和就业机会。然而,这种政府支持将逐步撤回,加上最近和预期的进一步利率上升以及与消费者和公司行为变化相关的市场影响,许多部门可能会进行重组。这就提出了一个公共政策问题,即政府支持促进和改善这种重组与合并管制所发挥的作用之间的适当平衡,包括COVID-19大流行及其后果如何影响英国和欧盟合并管制下所谓的“失败”或“退出”公司防御或情景的应用。为了考虑这些问题,本文:阐述了在英国和欧盟合并控制下支撑破产企业防御的政策考虑因素;描述了英国为应对COVID-19以及COVID-19对各个部门的影响而提供的广泛政府支持和国家援助;并概述了考虑到这些政策和事实考虑因素,“破产企业防御”所需的证据。©2022爱德华埃尔加出版有限公司
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The failing firm defence during and post-COVID-19: policy and the evidence required
Governments in developed countries have responded to the COVID-19 pandemic with an almost unprecedented level of government support, thereby preserving many firms and jobs. However, this government support will be progressively withdrawn, and coupled with recent, and expected further, increases in interest rates and the market impacts associated with changes in consumers’ and firms’ behaviour, there is likely to be restructuring in many sectors. This raises the public policy question as to the appropriate balance between government support facilitating and ameliorating this restructuring and the role played by merger control, including how the COVID-19 pandemic and its aftermath affects the application of the so-called ‘failing’ or ‘exiting’ firm defence or scenario under UK and EU merger control. To consider these questions, this article: addresses the policy considerations underpinning the failing firm defence under UK and EU merger control;describes the extensive government support and State aid provided in the UK in response to COVID-19 and the impact of COVID-19 on various sectors;and provides an overview of the evidence required for the ‘failing firm defence’, given these policy and factual considerations. © 2022 Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Competition Law Journal
Competition Law Journal Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
If the Competition and Markets Authority were an emoji: merger clearance lessons from Meta/Giphy Economists on trial: how to make expert duties, meetings, and hot tubs work The UK and EU competition rules for research and development agreements: falling out of lockstep The assessment and communication of the benefits of competition interventions by the Competition and Markets Authority The risks of a form-based approach to exclusionary abuses of dominance – an economic perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1