心脏手术前红细胞排序优化:单中心回顾性研究

IF 0.1 Q4 ANESTHESIOLOGY Acta anaesthesiologica Belgica Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.56126/73.4.24
A. Dincq, L. Thiltges, I. Michaux, M. Gourdin, G. Kalscheuer, L. Melly, M. Gillet, M. Bareille, S. Lessire, M. Hardy
{"title":"心脏手术前红细胞排序优化:单中心回顾性研究","authors":"A. Dincq, L. Thiltges, I. Michaux, M. Gourdin, G. Kalscheuer, L. Melly, M. Gillet, M. Bareille, S. Lessire, M. Hardy","doi":"10.56126/73.4.24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Cardiac surgery is associated with a high rate of intraoperative transfusion, requiring pre- ordering or ordering of packed red blood cell (PRBC) before surgery. Our institutional strategy is based on a systematic type and screen (T/S) ordering of 3 PRBCs at the blood bank then stored in a dedicated refrigerator in the operating room for each patient scheduled for cardiac surgery. However, these PRBC units are not always transfused and are therefore at risk of destruction if temperature fluctuations are detected during transport and storage processes. In addition, these orders represent a burden for the blood bank. Therefore, it is relevant to move towards a more tailored PRBC order before cardiac surgery and challenge the systematic ordering protocol.\n\nMethods: The Transfusion Understanding Scoring Tool (TRUST) and the Transfusion Risk and Clinical Knowledge (TRACK) Score are designed to stratify blood transfusion needs in cardiac surgery. We retrospectively performed both scores for each patient scheduled for cardiac surgery. Then, we compared their performance to predict PRBC transfusion and determined the optimal threshold to optimize the preoperative PRBC order reflecting the needs of our population managed with our local standards.\n\nResults: Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for prediction of PRBC transfusion using the two scores were computed for the whole cohort (n=1249). Both scores performed well (areas under ROC curves: 0.81 and 0.82 (95% CI) using the TRACK Score and the TRUST, respectively). A TRUST < 3 identified a subgroup of patients (53.6%) at low risk of transfusion. The availability of 1 T/S PRBC in the OR would cover the needs of the majority (92.5%) of this group.\n\nConclusions: In our institution, the use of the TRUST preoperatively could offer a more tailored T/S PRBC order for the intraoperative period, especially in the low-risk transfusion group.","PeriodicalId":7024,"journal":{"name":"Acta anaesthesiologica Belgica","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards optimized red blood cells ordering prior to cardiac surgery: a single center retrospective study\",\"authors\":\"A. Dincq, L. Thiltges, I. Michaux, M. Gourdin, G. Kalscheuer, L. Melly, M. Gillet, M. Bareille, S. Lessire, M. Hardy\",\"doi\":\"10.56126/73.4.24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Cardiac surgery is associated with a high rate of intraoperative transfusion, requiring pre- ordering or ordering of packed red blood cell (PRBC) before surgery. Our institutional strategy is based on a systematic type and screen (T/S) ordering of 3 PRBCs at the blood bank then stored in a dedicated refrigerator in the operating room for each patient scheduled for cardiac surgery. However, these PRBC units are not always transfused and are therefore at risk of destruction if temperature fluctuations are detected during transport and storage processes. In addition, these orders represent a burden for the blood bank. Therefore, it is relevant to move towards a more tailored PRBC order before cardiac surgery and challenge the systematic ordering protocol.\\n\\nMethods: The Transfusion Understanding Scoring Tool (TRUST) and the Transfusion Risk and Clinical Knowledge (TRACK) Score are designed to stratify blood transfusion needs in cardiac surgery. We retrospectively performed both scores for each patient scheduled for cardiac surgery. Then, we compared their performance to predict PRBC transfusion and determined the optimal threshold to optimize the preoperative PRBC order reflecting the needs of our population managed with our local standards.\\n\\nResults: Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for prediction of PRBC transfusion using the two scores were computed for the whole cohort (n=1249). Both scores performed well (areas under ROC curves: 0.81 and 0.82 (95% CI) using the TRACK Score and the TRUST, respectively). A TRUST < 3 identified a subgroup of patients (53.6%) at low risk of transfusion. The availability of 1 T/S PRBC in the OR would cover the needs of the majority (92.5%) of this group.\\n\\nConclusions: In our institution, the use of the TRUST preoperatively could offer a more tailored T/S PRBC order for the intraoperative period, especially in the low-risk transfusion group.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7024,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta anaesthesiologica Belgica\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta anaesthesiologica Belgica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56126/73.4.24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta anaesthesiologica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56126/73.4.24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:心脏手术与术中输血率高相关,需要术前预约或预约填充红细胞(PRBC)。我们的制度策略是基于血库中3个红细胞的系统类型和筛选(T/S)顺序,然后为每个计划进行心脏手术的患者存储在手术室的专用冰箱中。然而,这些PRBC单位并不总是输注,因此,如果在运输和储存过程中发现温度波动,就有被破坏的危险。此外,这些订单给血库带来了负担。因此,有必要在心脏手术前制定更有针对性的PRBC顺序,并挑战系统的顺序协议。方法:采用输血理解评分工具(TRUST)和输血风险与临床知识评分(TRACK)对心脏手术患者的输血需求进行分层。我们回顾性地对每位计划进行心脏手术的患者进行两项评分。然后,我们比较了它们在预测PRBC输注方面的表现,并确定了优化术前PRBC顺序的最佳阈值,以反映我们当地标准管理的人群的需求。结果:计算了整个队列(n=1249)使用这两个评分预测PRBC输血的受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线。两项评分均表现良好(ROC曲线下面积分别为0.81和0.82 (95% CI),使用TRACK评分和TRUST)。TRUST < 3确定了低输血风险患者亚组(53.6%)。在手术室提供1 T/S PRBC将满足这一群体中大多数人(92.5%)的需求。结论:在我院,术前使用TRUST可以为术中提供更有针对性的T/S PRBC顺序,特别是在低风险输血组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Towards optimized red blood cells ordering prior to cardiac surgery: a single center retrospective study
Background: Cardiac surgery is associated with a high rate of intraoperative transfusion, requiring pre- ordering or ordering of packed red blood cell (PRBC) before surgery. Our institutional strategy is based on a systematic type and screen (T/S) ordering of 3 PRBCs at the blood bank then stored in a dedicated refrigerator in the operating room for each patient scheduled for cardiac surgery. However, these PRBC units are not always transfused and are therefore at risk of destruction if temperature fluctuations are detected during transport and storage processes. In addition, these orders represent a burden for the blood bank. Therefore, it is relevant to move towards a more tailored PRBC order before cardiac surgery and challenge the systematic ordering protocol. Methods: The Transfusion Understanding Scoring Tool (TRUST) and the Transfusion Risk and Clinical Knowledge (TRACK) Score are designed to stratify blood transfusion needs in cardiac surgery. We retrospectively performed both scores for each patient scheduled for cardiac surgery. Then, we compared their performance to predict PRBC transfusion and determined the optimal threshold to optimize the preoperative PRBC order reflecting the needs of our population managed with our local standards. Results: Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for prediction of PRBC transfusion using the two scores were computed for the whole cohort (n=1249). Both scores performed well (areas under ROC curves: 0.81 and 0.82 (95% CI) using the TRACK Score and the TRUST, respectively). A TRUST < 3 identified a subgroup of patients (53.6%) at low risk of transfusion. The availability of 1 T/S PRBC in the OR would cover the needs of the majority (92.5%) of this group. Conclusions: In our institution, the use of the TRUST preoperatively could offer a more tailored T/S PRBC order for the intraoperative period, especially in the low-risk transfusion group.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
期刊介绍: L’Acta Anaesthesiologica Belgica est le journal de la SBAR, publié 4 fois par an. L’Acta a été publié pour la première fois en 1950. Depuis 1973 l’Acta est publié dans la langue Anglaise, ce qui a été résulté à un rayonnement plus internationaux. Depuis lors l’Acta est devenu un journal à ne pas manquer dans le domaine d’Anesthésie Belge, offrant e.a. les textes du congrès annuel, les Research Meetings, … Vous en trouvez aussi les dates des Research Meetings, du congrès annuel et des autres réunions.
期刊最新文献
The WHO Surgical Safety Checklist in Belgian hospitals: Changes in use, knowledge, opinions and perception of pressure among operating room professionals between 2016 and 2021 Herpes simplex virus reactivation among severe COVID-19 patients: to treat or not to treat? Assessing fluid shifts in the pediatric surgical patient: is bioimpedance a promising tool Incidence of brachial plexus injury after cardiac surgery: a retrospective study Catheter-based serratus anterior plane block vs. continuous wound infiltration for postoperative pain control following minimally invasive atrioventricular valve surgery : a randomized, prospective trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1