商誉会计:文献综述

Q3 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics Accounting Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.5267/j.ac.2022.9.002
Araceli Amorós Martínez, J. A. Rubio, Mónica Morales
{"title":"商誉会计:文献综述","authors":"Araceli Amorós Martínez, J. A. Rubio, Mónica Morales","doi":"10.5267/j.ac.2022.9.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper critically reviews the main empirical research on goodwill accounting with the purpose of informing and contributing to current debates: the application of a systematic amortisation plus an impairment when required (amortisation model) or an annual impairment-only test (impairment model). Using the main databases (ABI inform, ProQuest Central, Emerald, Science Direct, Scopus and Google Scholar), this critical review highlights the difficulty to resolve doubts at this stage. Arguments for and against the amortisation and impairment models are found. Nevertheless, going back to a systematic amortisation does not seem to be the solution but the impairment test model is eliminated. We also note that there is more room for improvement of the impairment model. Thus, we provide some guidelines and recommendations to improve it. Finally, we find that further investigation can be carried out to fill the gaps identified in the literature and we make recommendations for future research projects.","PeriodicalId":7317,"journal":{"name":"Accounting","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accounting for goodwill: A literature review\",\"authors\":\"Araceli Amorós Martínez, J. A. Rubio, Mónica Morales\",\"doi\":\"10.5267/j.ac.2022.9.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper critically reviews the main empirical research on goodwill accounting with the purpose of informing and contributing to current debates: the application of a systematic amortisation plus an impairment when required (amortisation model) or an annual impairment-only test (impairment model). Using the main databases (ABI inform, ProQuest Central, Emerald, Science Direct, Scopus and Google Scholar), this critical review highlights the difficulty to resolve doubts at this stage. Arguments for and against the amortisation and impairment models are found. Nevertheless, going back to a systematic amortisation does not seem to be the solution but the impairment test model is eliminated. We also note that there is more room for improvement of the impairment model. Thus, we provide some guidelines and recommendations to improve it. Finally, we find that further investigation can be carried out to fill the gaps identified in the literature and we make recommendations for future research projects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounting\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounting\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ac.2022.9.002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ac.2022.9.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文批判性地回顾了商誉会计的主要实证研究,目的是为当前的争论提供信息和贡献:系统摊销加必要时的减值(摊销模型)或年度仅减值测试(减值模型)的应用。通过使用主要数据库(ABI inform、ProQuest Central、Emerald、Science Direct、Scopus和b谷歌Scholar),这篇批判性综述强调了在这个阶段解决疑问的难度。对摊销模型和减值模型的支持和反对都有发现。然而,回到系统性摊销似乎不是解决方案,但减值测试模型被淘汰了。我们也注意到,减值模型还有更大的改进空间。因此,我们提供了一些改进的指导和建议。最后,我们发现可以进行进一步的调查来填补文献中发现的空白,并为未来的研究项目提出建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Accounting for goodwill: A literature review
This paper critically reviews the main empirical research on goodwill accounting with the purpose of informing and contributing to current debates: the application of a systematic amortisation plus an impairment when required (amortisation model) or an annual impairment-only test (impairment model). Using the main databases (ABI inform, ProQuest Central, Emerald, Science Direct, Scopus and Google Scholar), this critical review highlights the difficulty to resolve doubts at this stage. Arguments for and against the amortisation and impairment models are found. Nevertheless, going back to a systematic amortisation does not seem to be the solution but the impairment test model is eliminated. We also note that there is more room for improvement of the impairment model. Thus, we provide some guidelines and recommendations to improve it. Finally, we find that further investigation can be carried out to fill the gaps identified in the literature and we make recommendations for future research projects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounting
Accounting Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmaceutical Science
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Bibliometric analysis of risk measures for portfolio optimization The effects of customer relationship management, service quality and relationship marketing on customer retention: The mediation role of bank customer retention in Indonesia Money laundering conviction rate and capital formation in Nigeria The risk premium in times of financial crisis: an assessment from ICAPM on the MENA region Basel accord capital regulations and financial risk management: Empirical evidence from Pakistan’s financial institutions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1