读克劳德·勒福特:跟随里奥·施特劳斯的脚步

Claudia Hilb
{"title":"读克劳德·勒福特:跟随里奥·施特劳斯的脚步","authors":"Claudia Hilb","doi":"10.5209/REV_FOIN.2015.V15.50380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It might seem outlandish to examine the theoretical links between the work of Claude Lefort, a left-wing French student of democracy, and Leo Strauss, the radical critic of modern mass democracy, usually associated with conservativism in North American political thought. Nonetheless, every reader of Lefort is certainly aware of his respect for Strauss’s reading of Machiavelli and for the Straussian insights into modern political thought. This article tries to make sense of Lefort’s dialogue with Strauss, both in its explicit and implicit aspects, focusing on the fundamental points of agreement and on the most relevant differences between the two authors.","PeriodicalId":40606,"journal":{"name":"Foro Interno-Anuario de Teoria Politica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5209/REV_FOIN.2015.V15.50380","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Leyendo a Claude Lefort: tras el rastro de Leo Strauss\",\"authors\":\"Claudia Hilb\",\"doi\":\"10.5209/REV_FOIN.2015.V15.50380\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It might seem outlandish to examine the theoretical links between the work of Claude Lefort, a left-wing French student of democracy, and Leo Strauss, the radical critic of modern mass democracy, usually associated with conservativism in North American political thought. Nonetheless, every reader of Lefort is certainly aware of his respect for Strauss’s reading of Machiavelli and for the Straussian insights into modern political thought. This article tries to make sense of Lefort’s dialogue with Strauss, both in its explicit and implicit aspects, focusing on the fundamental points of agreement and on the most relevant differences between the two authors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40606,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Foro Interno-Anuario de Teoria Politica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5209/REV_FOIN.2015.V15.50380\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Foro Interno-Anuario de Teoria Politica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5209/REV_FOIN.2015.V15.50380\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foro Interno-Anuario de Teoria Politica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5209/REV_FOIN.2015.V15.50380","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

法国左翼民主研究学者克劳德•勒福特(Claude Lefort)和现代大众民主的激进批评家利奥•斯特劳斯(Leo Strauss)的著作之间的理论联系似乎有些古怪,后者通常与北美政治思想中的保守主义联系在一起。尽管如此,莱福特的每一位读者肯定都知道他尊重施特劳斯对马基雅维利的解读,以及施特劳斯对现代政治思想的见解。本文试图理解莱福特与施特劳斯的对话,无论是显性的还是隐性的,重点是两位作者之间的基本共识和最相关的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Leyendo a Claude Lefort: tras el rastro de Leo Strauss
It might seem outlandish to examine the theoretical links between the work of Claude Lefort, a left-wing French student of democracy, and Leo Strauss, the radical critic of modern mass democracy, usually associated with conservativism in North American political thought. Nonetheless, every reader of Lefort is certainly aware of his respect for Strauss’s reading of Machiavelli and for the Straussian insights into modern political thought. This article tries to make sense of Lefort’s dialogue with Strauss, both in its explicit and implicit aspects, focusing on the fundamental points of agreement and on the most relevant differences between the two authors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
50 weeks
期刊最新文献
Cinco siglos de un debate: rebelión y reforma frente a revolución en las Comunidades de Castilla en su V Centenario Editorial Nudo borromeo y teoría del discurso. Contribuciones para el análisis de identidades, fenómenos y procesos políticos y sociales Carlos Allones Pérez, Liberalismo, nacionalismo, socialismo, feminismo. Una interpretación sociológica, prólogo de Carlos Moya, Catarata, Madrid, 2021. 142 páginas. ISBN: 978-84-1352-256-2. Crítica al fundamentalismo electoral a través del mecanismo del sorteo: propuestas democráticas de Burnheim y Goodwin desde una perspectiva utópica
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1