治疗末期双生长棒的回顾性研究

P. Zarantonello, G. Tedesco, E. Maredi, K. Martikos, F. Vommaro, A. Scarale, T. Greggi
{"title":"治疗末期双生长棒的回顾性研究","authors":"P. Zarantonello, G. Tedesco, E. Maredi, K. Martikos, F. Vommaro, A. Scarale, T. Greggi","doi":"10.4172/2165-7939.1000423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Study design: Retrospective review of patients affected by Early Onset Scoliosis (EOS), treated with dual growing rod (GR) and reached final posterior arthrodesis. Objective: To evaluate the trend of main thoracic and kyphotic curves during treatment with GR until final fusion. Background context: Previous studies analysed the effect of GR implantation and lengthening during treatment of patients affected by EOS. The sagittal balance has not been previously evaluated. Methods: 52 patients affected by EOS, treated with growing implants from 2007 to 2017 at our Institution were reviewed. We considered 10 consecutive patients treated with dual mechanical GR and reached final arthrodesis. The lengthening are made every 10-12 months. The minimum follow-up was 2 years and the minimum number of lengthening was 2. Every patients were monitored with periodic anteroposterior and lateral X-Ray. Measurements of the main thoracic curve and of kyphosis were performed according to Cobb method at different stages of treatment. Results: Both main thoracic and kyphotic curves had similar trends during treatment. The main thoracic curve improved from a mean pre-op value of 63,8° Cobb to a mean value of 39° Cobb after placement of GR. During lengthening, there was a loss of correction. After final arthrodesis, the average angle of main thoracic curve was 47,6° Cobb. The kyphosis changed from a mean pre-op angle of 62°, to a mean angle of 40,2° after the treatment with GR. The measure at the end of lengthenings was 49,9° and after the final arthrodesis the average angle of the kyphosis was 49,6° Cobb. Conclusion: Both main thoracic and kyphotic curves show a fluctuating trend. The first implant represents the most corrective system, instead lengthening shows a partial loss of correction. The final correction obtained by definitive arthrodesis is comparable to the first correction. The main reason for this trend could be the progressive autofusion of the spine during treatment, which causes a progressive stiffness of the spine. *Corresponding author: Paola Zarantonello, Department of Spine Deformity, IRCCS Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Rizzoli Orthopedic Institute – Via Giulio Cesare Pupilli, 1, 40136-Bologna BO, Italy, Tel: +393478379071; E-mail: paola.zarantonello@ior.it, p.zarantonello1@gmail.com Received November 06, 2018; Accepted November 19, 2018; Published November 21, 2018 Citation: Zarantonello P, Tedesco G, Maredi E, Martikos K, Vommaro F, et al. (2018) A Retrospective Study on Dual Growing Rod at the End of Treatment. J Spine 7: 423. doi: 10.4172/2165-7939.1000423 Copyright: © 2018 Zarantonello P, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.","PeriodicalId":89593,"journal":{"name":"Journal of spine","volume":"07 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4172/2165-7939.1000423","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Retrospective Study on Dual Growing Rod at the End of Treatment\",\"authors\":\"P. Zarantonello, G. Tedesco, E. Maredi, K. Martikos, F. Vommaro, A. Scarale, T. Greggi\",\"doi\":\"10.4172/2165-7939.1000423\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Study design: Retrospective review of patients affected by Early Onset Scoliosis (EOS), treated with dual growing rod (GR) and reached final posterior arthrodesis. Objective: To evaluate the trend of main thoracic and kyphotic curves during treatment with GR until final fusion. Background context: Previous studies analysed the effect of GR implantation and lengthening during treatment of patients affected by EOS. The sagittal balance has not been previously evaluated. Methods: 52 patients affected by EOS, treated with growing implants from 2007 to 2017 at our Institution were reviewed. We considered 10 consecutive patients treated with dual mechanical GR and reached final arthrodesis. The lengthening are made every 10-12 months. The minimum follow-up was 2 years and the minimum number of lengthening was 2. Every patients were monitored with periodic anteroposterior and lateral X-Ray. Measurements of the main thoracic curve and of kyphosis were performed according to Cobb method at different stages of treatment. Results: Both main thoracic and kyphotic curves had similar trends during treatment. The main thoracic curve improved from a mean pre-op value of 63,8° Cobb to a mean value of 39° Cobb after placement of GR. During lengthening, there was a loss of correction. After final arthrodesis, the average angle of main thoracic curve was 47,6° Cobb. The kyphosis changed from a mean pre-op angle of 62°, to a mean angle of 40,2° after the treatment with GR. The measure at the end of lengthenings was 49,9° and after the final arthrodesis the average angle of the kyphosis was 49,6° Cobb. Conclusion: Both main thoracic and kyphotic curves show a fluctuating trend. The first implant represents the most corrective system, instead lengthening shows a partial loss of correction. The final correction obtained by definitive arthrodesis is comparable to the first correction. The main reason for this trend could be the progressive autofusion of the spine during treatment, which causes a progressive stiffness of the spine. *Corresponding author: Paola Zarantonello, Department of Spine Deformity, IRCCS Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Rizzoli Orthopedic Institute – Via Giulio Cesare Pupilli, 1, 40136-Bologna BO, Italy, Tel: +393478379071; E-mail: paola.zarantonello@ior.it, p.zarantonello1@gmail.com Received November 06, 2018; Accepted November 19, 2018; Published November 21, 2018 Citation: Zarantonello P, Tedesco G, Maredi E, Martikos K, Vommaro F, et al. (2018) A Retrospective Study on Dual Growing Rod at the End of Treatment. J Spine 7: 423. doi: 10.4172/2165-7939.1000423 Copyright: © 2018 Zarantonello P, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.\",\"PeriodicalId\":89593,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of spine\",\"volume\":\"07 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4172/2165-7939.1000423\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of spine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4172/2165-7939.1000423\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of spine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2165-7939.1000423","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究设计:回顾性分析早发性脊柱侧凸(EOS)患者,采用双生长棒(GR)治疗并最终达到后路关节融合术。目的:评价GR治疗至最终融合术期间主胸和后凸曲线的变化趋势。背景背景:以往的研究分析了GR植入和延长对EOS患者治疗的影响。矢状面平衡以前没有被评估过。方法:回顾性分析我院2007 - 2017年种植体治疗的52例EOS患者。我们考虑了连续10例采用双机械GR治疗并达到最终关节融合术的患者。每10-12个月拉长一次。最小随访时间为2年,最小延长次数为2次。每例患者定期行正位x线及侧位x线监测。在治疗的不同阶段,采用Cobb法测量主胸曲线和后凸。结果:在治疗期间,主胸和后凸曲线有相似的变化趋势。置入GR后,主胸弯曲度从术前平均63.8°Cobb改善至39°Cobb。在延长期间,矫正效果丧失。最终关节融合术后,胸椎主弯平均角度为47,6°Cobb。后凸从术前的平均62°变为GR治疗后的平均40.2°。延长结束时的测量值为49.9°,最终关节固定术后后凸的平均角度为49.6°。结论:主胸椎和后凸曲线均呈波动趋势。第一次种植体代表了最大的矫正系统,而延长则显示了部分矫正的损失。关节融合术获得的最终矫正与第一次矫正相当。这种趋势的主要原因可能是在治疗过程中脊柱的进行性自融合,导致脊柱的进行性僵硬。*通讯作者:Paola Zarantonello, Rizzoli骨科研究所脊柱畸形部,IRCCS骨科与创伤科,Via Giulio Cesare Pupilli, 1,40136 - boologna BO, Italy, Tel: +393478379071;邮箱:paola.zarantonello@ior.it, p.zarantonello1@gmail.com2018年11月19日录用;引用本文:Zarantonello P, Tedesco G, Maredi E, Martikos K, Vommaro F,等(2018)治疗结束时双生长杆的回顾性研究。[J]脊骨杂志7:423。doi: 10.4172/2165-7939.1000423版权所有:©2018 Zarantonello P, et al。这是一篇根据知识共享署名许可协议发布的开放获取文章,该协议允许在任何媒体上不受限制地使用、分发和复制,前提是要注明原作者和来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Retrospective Study on Dual Growing Rod at the End of Treatment
Study design: Retrospective review of patients affected by Early Onset Scoliosis (EOS), treated with dual growing rod (GR) and reached final posterior arthrodesis. Objective: To evaluate the trend of main thoracic and kyphotic curves during treatment with GR until final fusion. Background context: Previous studies analysed the effect of GR implantation and lengthening during treatment of patients affected by EOS. The sagittal balance has not been previously evaluated. Methods: 52 patients affected by EOS, treated with growing implants from 2007 to 2017 at our Institution were reviewed. We considered 10 consecutive patients treated with dual mechanical GR and reached final arthrodesis. The lengthening are made every 10-12 months. The minimum follow-up was 2 years and the minimum number of lengthening was 2. Every patients were monitored with periodic anteroposterior and lateral X-Ray. Measurements of the main thoracic curve and of kyphosis were performed according to Cobb method at different stages of treatment. Results: Both main thoracic and kyphotic curves had similar trends during treatment. The main thoracic curve improved from a mean pre-op value of 63,8° Cobb to a mean value of 39° Cobb after placement of GR. During lengthening, there was a loss of correction. After final arthrodesis, the average angle of main thoracic curve was 47,6° Cobb. The kyphosis changed from a mean pre-op angle of 62°, to a mean angle of 40,2° after the treatment with GR. The measure at the end of lengthenings was 49,9° and after the final arthrodesis the average angle of the kyphosis was 49,6° Cobb. Conclusion: Both main thoracic and kyphotic curves show a fluctuating trend. The first implant represents the most corrective system, instead lengthening shows a partial loss of correction. The final correction obtained by definitive arthrodesis is comparable to the first correction. The main reason for this trend could be the progressive autofusion of the spine during treatment, which causes a progressive stiffness of the spine. *Corresponding author: Paola Zarantonello, Department of Spine Deformity, IRCCS Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Rizzoli Orthopedic Institute – Via Giulio Cesare Pupilli, 1, 40136-Bologna BO, Italy, Tel: +393478379071; E-mail: paola.zarantonello@ior.it, p.zarantonello1@gmail.com Received November 06, 2018; Accepted November 19, 2018; Published November 21, 2018 Citation: Zarantonello P, Tedesco G, Maredi E, Martikos K, Vommaro F, et al. (2018) A Retrospective Study on Dual Growing Rod at the End of Treatment. J Spine 7: 423. doi: 10.4172/2165-7939.1000423 Copyright: © 2018 Zarantonello P, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Nerve Injury in Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Importance of Anticoagulants and Antiplatelet Agents in Spine Surgery Theoretical Model of the Lumbar Spine Musculature Editorial Note on Spondylolysis & Spondylolisthesis A Rare Case of Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression Originating from Extragonadal Mediastinal Yolk Sac Tumor: A Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1