混合神经传导研究在肘部尺神经病变诊断中的应用

IF 0.4 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES Neurological Sciences and Neurophysiology Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.4103/nsn.nsn_151_22
Selahattin Ayas, E. Issı
{"title":"混合神经传导研究在肘部尺神经病变诊断中的应用","authors":"Selahattin Ayas, E. Issı","doi":"10.4103/nsn.nsn_151_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This study aims to investigate the ulnar-median mixed nerve latency difference (U-MLD) recorded from the medial aspect of the arm both in patients with ulnar neuropathy at the elbow (UNE) and in healthy individuals and thus to assist in the diagnosis of UNE. Materials and Methods: Twenty-nine patients meeting electrophysiological criteria defined by the American Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine for diagnosis of UNE, and 50 healthy individuals were included in the study retrospectively. All participants' data were evaluated, such as median/ulnar motor and sensory response, U-MLD and the percentage of ulnar mixed nerve response amplitude difference between sides. Results: The U-MLD was significantly higher in patients with UNE than in the control group (1.78 ± 0.64 ms vs. 0.6 ± 0.22 ms, P = 0.000). The percentage of the ulnar mixed nerve response amplitude loss was significantly higher in the patient group compared to the control group (43.9% ± 30.3% vs. 21.4% ± 12.2%, P = 0.018). The U-MLD was significantly higher in the patients with amplitude loss ≥50%, and the ulnar mixed nerve response amplitude loss was ≥50% in all five patients with the ulnar sensory nerve action potential pathology. Conclusions: U-MLD is higher in patients with UNE; it can provide additional data in mild cases regarding the diagnosis of UNE, especially. Furthermore, the criterion that the ulnar mixed nerve response amplitude difference between the sides ≥50% suggests that it can be used to evaluate the severity of UNE.","PeriodicalId":48555,"journal":{"name":"Neurological Sciences and Neurophysiology","volume":"40 1","pages":"59 - 63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mixed nerve conduction study in the diagnosis of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow\",\"authors\":\"Selahattin Ayas, E. Issı\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/nsn.nsn_151_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: This study aims to investigate the ulnar-median mixed nerve latency difference (U-MLD) recorded from the medial aspect of the arm both in patients with ulnar neuropathy at the elbow (UNE) and in healthy individuals and thus to assist in the diagnosis of UNE. Materials and Methods: Twenty-nine patients meeting electrophysiological criteria defined by the American Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine for diagnosis of UNE, and 50 healthy individuals were included in the study retrospectively. All participants' data were evaluated, such as median/ulnar motor and sensory response, U-MLD and the percentage of ulnar mixed nerve response amplitude difference between sides. Results: The U-MLD was significantly higher in patients with UNE than in the control group (1.78 ± 0.64 ms vs. 0.6 ± 0.22 ms, P = 0.000). The percentage of the ulnar mixed nerve response amplitude loss was significantly higher in the patient group compared to the control group (43.9% ± 30.3% vs. 21.4% ± 12.2%, P = 0.018). The U-MLD was significantly higher in the patients with amplitude loss ≥50%, and the ulnar mixed nerve response amplitude loss was ≥50% in all five patients with the ulnar sensory nerve action potential pathology. Conclusions: U-MLD is higher in patients with UNE; it can provide additional data in mild cases regarding the diagnosis of UNE, especially. Furthermore, the criterion that the ulnar mixed nerve response amplitude difference between the sides ≥50% suggests that it can be used to evaluate the severity of UNE.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48555,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurological Sciences and Neurophysiology\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"59 - 63\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurological Sciences and Neurophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/nsn.nsn_151_22\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurological Sciences and Neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/nsn.nsn_151_22","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在探讨肘部尺神经病变(UNE)患者和健康人从手臂内侧记录的尺正中混合神经潜伏期差(U-MLD),从而协助UNE的诊断。材料和方法:回顾性研究29例符合美国神经肌肉和电诊断医学协会诊断UNE的电生理标准的患者和50例健康个体。评估所有参与者的数据,如正中/尺侧运动和感觉反应,U-MLD和尺侧混合神经反应幅度差百分比。结果:UNE患者U-MLD明显高于对照组(1.78±0.64 ms vs. 0.6±0.22 ms, P = 0.000)。患者组尺混合神经反应幅度损失比例明显高于对照组(43.9%±30.3% vs. 21.4%±12.2%,P = 0.018)。幅度损失≥50%的患者U-MLD显著增高,5例尺侧感觉神经动作电位病变患者尺侧混合神经反应幅度损失均≥50%。结论:UNE患者U-MLD较高;它可以为诊断UNE的轻度病例提供额外的数据,特别是。此外,两侧尺侧混合神经反应幅度差≥50%的标准提示可用于评估UNE的严重程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mixed nerve conduction study in the diagnosis of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow
Purpose: This study aims to investigate the ulnar-median mixed nerve latency difference (U-MLD) recorded from the medial aspect of the arm both in patients with ulnar neuropathy at the elbow (UNE) and in healthy individuals and thus to assist in the diagnosis of UNE. Materials and Methods: Twenty-nine patients meeting electrophysiological criteria defined by the American Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine for diagnosis of UNE, and 50 healthy individuals were included in the study retrospectively. All participants' data were evaluated, such as median/ulnar motor and sensory response, U-MLD and the percentage of ulnar mixed nerve response amplitude difference between sides. Results: The U-MLD was significantly higher in patients with UNE than in the control group (1.78 ± 0.64 ms vs. 0.6 ± 0.22 ms, P = 0.000). The percentage of the ulnar mixed nerve response amplitude loss was significantly higher in the patient group compared to the control group (43.9% ± 30.3% vs. 21.4% ± 12.2%, P = 0.018). The U-MLD was significantly higher in the patients with amplitude loss ≥50%, and the ulnar mixed nerve response amplitude loss was ≥50% in all five patients with the ulnar sensory nerve action potential pathology. Conclusions: U-MLD is higher in patients with UNE; it can provide additional data in mild cases regarding the diagnosis of UNE, especially. Furthermore, the criterion that the ulnar mixed nerve response amplitude difference between the sides ≥50% suggests that it can be used to evaluate the severity of UNE.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
25.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurological Sciences and Neurophysiology is the double blind peer-reviewed, open access, international publication organ of Turkish Society of Clinical Neurophysiology EEG-EMG. The journal is a quarterly publication, published in March, June, September and December and the publication language of the journal is English.
期刊最新文献
Transcranial Sonography in Parkinson’s Disease and Parkinsonism The liverpool adverse drug events profile (LAEP): Validity and reliability of Turkish version (LAEP-TR) Congenital myasthenic syndrome with a rare mutation diagnosed at adult age Comparison of surgery and local steroid injections for the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome: A randomized controlled trial High-dose steroids versus standard treatment for myasthenic crisis: A single-center, longitudinal, 12-year retrospective study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1