一种估算多种接种动物抗口蹄疫保护性免疫的新方法。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 VIROLOGY Acta virologica Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.4149/av_2022_110
B. Jain, Anuj Tewari, M. Prasad, S. K. Kadian
{"title":"一种估算多种接种动物抗口蹄疫保护性免疫的新方法。","authors":"B. Jain, Anuj Tewari, M. Prasad, S. K. Kadian","doi":"10.4149/av_2022_110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, forty serum samples from field buffaloes vaccinated with inactivated foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) vaccine were collected. These animals were multiple vaccinated with the above vaccine during previous years. The study was conducted to determine the actual status of the protective antibodies generated after vaccination. Initially, the serum samples were tested by Liquid phase blocking ELISA (LPBE), and only samples with titer more than 1.4 in LPBE were chosen for further analysis. These samples were tested with an in-house Gold Nanoparticle-based test for detection of anti-FMDV structural protein antibodies, in which the antibodies were detected at 10-4 dilution; this was suggestive of strong antibody titer generated post-vaccination. To test the binding affinity of these antibodies with the antigen, an avidity ELISA was developed and outcomes were expressed in terms of avidity index (AI). It was found that the avidity was low in some of the animals even after multiple vaccinations. Therefore, multiple vaccinations and strong antibody titer generation may not be the actual indicator of the protective immune response generated. We conclude that avidity ELISA can be a better approach than LPBE to measure the level of protective antibodies generated post-vaccination. Keywords: avidity ELISA; foot-and-mouth disease; post-vaccination monitoring; herd immunity; PCP-FMD.","PeriodicalId":7205,"journal":{"name":"Acta virologica","volume":"71 1","pages":"90-94"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A novel approach for estimation of anti-FMDV protective immunity generated in multiple vaccinated field animals.\",\"authors\":\"B. Jain, Anuj Tewari, M. Prasad, S. K. Kadian\",\"doi\":\"10.4149/av_2022_110\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this study, forty serum samples from field buffaloes vaccinated with inactivated foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) vaccine were collected. These animals were multiple vaccinated with the above vaccine during previous years. The study was conducted to determine the actual status of the protective antibodies generated after vaccination. Initially, the serum samples were tested by Liquid phase blocking ELISA (LPBE), and only samples with titer more than 1.4 in LPBE were chosen for further analysis. These samples were tested with an in-house Gold Nanoparticle-based test for detection of anti-FMDV structural protein antibodies, in which the antibodies were detected at 10-4 dilution; this was suggestive of strong antibody titer generated post-vaccination. To test the binding affinity of these antibodies with the antigen, an avidity ELISA was developed and outcomes were expressed in terms of avidity index (AI). It was found that the avidity was low in some of the animals even after multiple vaccinations. Therefore, multiple vaccinations and strong antibody titer generation may not be the actual indicator of the protective immune response generated. We conclude that avidity ELISA can be a better approach than LPBE to measure the level of protective antibodies generated post-vaccination. Keywords: avidity ELISA; foot-and-mouth disease; post-vaccination monitoring; herd immunity; PCP-FMD.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7205,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta virologica\",\"volume\":\"71 1\",\"pages\":\"90-94\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta virologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4149/av_2022_110\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"VIROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta virologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4149/av_2022_110","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"VIROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究收集了40份接种口蹄疫灭活疫苗的野地水牛血清样本。这些动物在前几年多次接种上述疫苗。本研究旨在确定疫苗接种后产生的保护性抗体的实际状态。初步采用液相阻断ELISA (Liquid phase blocking ELISA, LPBE)检测血清样本,仅选择LPBE效价大于1.4的样本进行进一步分析。这些样品使用内部基于金纳米颗粒的检测抗fmdv结构蛋白抗体的测试进行测试,其中抗体在10-4稀释下检测;这提示疫苗接种后产生了强抗体滴度。为了测试这些抗体与抗原的结合亲和力,开发了亲和度ELISA,并用亲和度指数(AI)表达结果。结果发现,即使多次接种疫苗,部分动物的贪婪度仍很低。因此,多次接种和强抗体滴度的产生可能不是保护性免疫反应产生的实际指标。我们得出结论,贪婪ELISA可以比LPBE更好地测量疫苗接种后产生的保护性抗体水平。关键词:贪婪酶联免疫吸附试验;手足口病;接种后的监控;群体免疫;PCP-FMD。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A novel approach for estimation of anti-FMDV protective immunity generated in multiple vaccinated field animals.
In this study, forty serum samples from field buffaloes vaccinated with inactivated foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) vaccine were collected. These animals were multiple vaccinated with the above vaccine during previous years. The study was conducted to determine the actual status of the protective antibodies generated after vaccination. Initially, the serum samples were tested by Liquid phase blocking ELISA (LPBE), and only samples with titer more than 1.4 in LPBE were chosen for further analysis. These samples were tested with an in-house Gold Nanoparticle-based test for detection of anti-FMDV structural protein antibodies, in which the antibodies were detected at 10-4 dilution; this was suggestive of strong antibody titer generated post-vaccination. To test the binding affinity of these antibodies with the antigen, an avidity ELISA was developed and outcomes were expressed in terms of avidity index (AI). It was found that the avidity was low in some of the animals even after multiple vaccinations. Therefore, multiple vaccinations and strong antibody titer generation may not be the actual indicator of the protective immune response generated. We conclude that avidity ELISA can be a better approach than LPBE to measure the level of protective antibodies generated post-vaccination. Keywords: avidity ELISA; foot-and-mouth disease; post-vaccination monitoring; herd immunity; PCP-FMD.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta virologica
Acta virologica 医学-病毒学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
11.80%
发文量
43
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta virologica is an international journal of predominantly molecular and cellular virology. Acta virologica aims to publish papers reporting original results of fundamental and applied research mainly on human, animal and plant viruses at cellular and molecular level. As a matter of tradition, also rickettsiae are included. Areas of interest are virus structure and morphology, molecular biology of virus-cell interactions, molecular genetics of viruses, pathogenesis of viral diseases, viral immunology, vaccines, antiviral drugs and viral diagnostics.
期刊最新文献
The interaction of influenza A virus RNA polymerase PA subunit with the human β-actin protein Construction of recombinant adenovirus-5 vector to prevent replication-competent adenovirus occurrence Virtual screening and molecular dynamics simulation to identify potential SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro inhibitors from a natural product compounds library The TRK-fused gene negatively regulates interferon signaling by inhibiting TBK1 phosphorylation during PPMV-1 infection Favipiravir and ivermectin show in vitro synergistic antiviral activity against SARS-CoV-2
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1