{"title":"底栖动物栖息地对浒苔藻与海草白藻的利用比较","authors":"W. Nelson, R. Virnstein, M. Barkaszi","doi":"10.5343/bms.2021.0023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The abundance and species composition of the macrofauna inhabiting adjacent beds of the seagrass Halodule wrightii and the attached macroalga Caulerpa prolifera were compared seasonally from eight sites sampled within the Indian River Lagoon, Florida during 1987–1988. At each site, sampling employed a benthic corer, an epifaunal sampler, a dipnet, and fish traps to examine utilization patterns of different components of the fauna. Abundance of animals in both habitats was both high and similar. Epifaunal invertebrate densities averaged over 16,000 m−2 from H. wrightii and over 20,300 m−2 from C. prolifera. Despite a few species-compositional differences, there was no consistent difference in either the abundance or number of species of the macrofauna of C. prolifera versus H. wrightii for any sampling method except fish traps. Fish were significantly more abundant, but not more species rich, in H. wrightii. We conclude that C. prolifera offers habitat for many small invertebrates comparable to that of seagrass, making C. prolifera beds a valuable biological resource. While C. prolifera habitat may not support all the ecosystem services of seagrass beds and is not currently protected in Florida, it as a potential vegetated habitat refugium and may warrant management and protection practices similar to those for seagrass beds.","PeriodicalId":55312,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Marine Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Benthic macrofaunal habitat use of the alga Caulerpa prolifera compared to the seagrass Halodule wrightii\",\"authors\":\"W. Nelson, R. Virnstein, M. Barkaszi\",\"doi\":\"10.5343/bms.2021.0023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The abundance and species composition of the macrofauna inhabiting adjacent beds of the seagrass Halodule wrightii and the attached macroalga Caulerpa prolifera were compared seasonally from eight sites sampled within the Indian River Lagoon, Florida during 1987–1988. At each site, sampling employed a benthic corer, an epifaunal sampler, a dipnet, and fish traps to examine utilization patterns of different components of the fauna. Abundance of animals in both habitats was both high and similar. Epifaunal invertebrate densities averaged over 16,000 m−2 from H. wrightii and over 20,300 m−2 from C. prolifera. Despite a few species-compositional differences, there was no consistent difference in either the abundance or number of species of the macrofauna of C. prolifera versus H. wrightii for any sampling method except fish traps. Fish were significantly more abundant, but not more species rich, in H. wrightii. We conclude that C. prolifera offers habitat for many small invertebrates comparable to that of seagrass, making C. prolifera beds a valuable biological resource. While C. prolifera habitat may not support all the ecosystem services of seagrass beds and is not currently protected in Florida, it as a potential vegetated habitat refugium and may warrant management and protection practices similar to those for seagrass beds.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55312,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of Marine Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of Marine Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5343/bms.2021.0023\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Marine Science","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5343/bms.2021.0023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
1987-1988年,对美国佛罗里达州印第安河泻湖8个取样点的大型动物群落的丰度和种类组成进行了季节性比较。在每个地点,采用底栖生物覆盖层、脚底取样器、浸入器和捕鱼器进行取样,以检查动物群不同组成部分的利用模式。这两个栖息地的动物丰度都很高,而且相似。脚底无脊椎动物密度平均超过16000 m - 2的是赖特氏棘猴,超过20300 m - 2的是增殖棘猴。除捕鱼法外,两种取样方法的大型区系丰度和物种数量均无一致性差异。鱼类数量显著增加,但物种数量没有增加。我们认为,藻床为许多小型无脊椎动物提供了与海草相当的栖息地,是一种宝贵的生物资源。虽然增殖藻栖息地可能不支持海草床的所有生态系统服务,并且目前在佛罗里达州没有受到保护,但它作为一个潜在的植被栖息地避难所,可能需要类似于海草床的管理和保护措施。
Benthic macrofaunal habitat use of the alga Caulerpa prolifera compared to the seagrass Halodule wrightii
The abundance and species composition of the macrofauna inhabiting adjacent beds of the seagrass Halodule wrightii and the attached macroalga Caulerpa prolifera were compared seasonally from eight sites sampled within the Indian River Lagoon, Florida during 1987–1988. At each site, sampling employed a benthic corer, an epifaunal sampler, a dipnet, and fish traps to examine utilization patterns of different components of the fauna. Abundance of animals in both habitats was both high and similar. Epifaunal invertebrate densities averaged over 16,000 m−2 from H. wrightii and over 20,300 m−2 from C. prolifera. Despite a few species-compositional differences, there was no consistent difference in either the abundance or number of species of the macrofauna of C. prolifera versus H. wrightii for any sampling method except fish traps. Fish were significantly more abundant, but not more species rich, in H. wrightii. We conclude that C. prolifera offers habitat for many small invertebrates comparable to that of seagrass, making C. prolifera beds a valuable biological resource. While C. prolifera habitat may not support all the ecosystem services of seagrass beds and is not currently protected in Florida, it as a potential vegetated habitat refugium and may warrant management and protection practices similar to those for seagrass beds.
期刊介绍:
The Bulletin of Marine Science is a hybrid open access journal dedicated to the dissemination of research dealing with the waters of the world’s oceans. All aspects of marine science are treated by the Bulletin of Marine Science, including papers in marine biology, biological oceanography, fisheries, marine policy, applied marine physics, marine geology and geophysics, marine and atmospheric chemistry, meteorology, and physical oceanography. In most regular issues the Bulletin features separate sections on new taxa, coral reefs, and novel research gear, instrument, device, or system with potential to advance marine research (“Research Tools in Marine Science”). Additionally, the Bulletin publishes informative stand-alone artwork with accompany text in its section "Portraits of Marine Science."