秘鲁大学生一般自我效能量表(EAG)的心理测量证据

IF 0.5 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Ansiedad y Estres-Anxiety and Stress Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.5093/anyes2021a18
Mirian Grimaldo Muchotrigo, Jossué David Correa Rojas, Gustavo Alexis Calderón-De La Cruz
{"title":"秘鲁大学生一般自我效能量表(EAG)的心理测量证据","authors":"Mirian Grimaldo Muchotrigo, Jossué David Correa Rojas, Gustavo Alexis Calderón-De La Cruz","doi":"10.5093/anyes2021a18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of the present study was to psychometrically examine the General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSS). The sample consisted of 907 students (53.4% women) between 17 and 26 years old from public and private universities in the metropolitan city of Lima. The measurement instruments were the EAG and the Positive and Negative Affect Scale (SPANAS for its acronym in English). The results demonstrated the unidimensionality of the instrument through the evidence of validity of the internal structure and its relationship with other constructs, demonstrating in the latter a convergence with positive affect and divergence with negative affect. The reliability was acceptable with the Omega coefficient, and the measurement invariance in gender was demonstrated. These results contribute to the potential usefulness of the EAG in Peruvian university students, recommendations for future studies are established.","PeriodicalId":45616,"journal":{"name":"Ansiedad y Estres-Anxiety and Stress","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evidencias psicométricas de la Escala de Autoeficacia General (EAG) en universitarios peruanos\",\"authors\":\"Mirian Grimaldo Muchotrigo, Jossué David Correa Rojas, Gustavo Alexis Calderón-De La Cruz\",\"doi\":\"10.5093/anyes2021a18\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The objective of the present study was to psychometrically examine the General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSS). The sample consisted of 907 students (53.4% women) between 17 and 26 years old from public and private universities in the metropolitan city of Lima. The measurement instruments were the EAG and the Positive and Negative Affect Scale (SPANAS for its acronym in English). The results demonstrated the unidimensionality of the instrument through the evidence of validity of the internal structure and its relationship with other constructs, demonstrating in the latter a convergence with positive affect and divergence with negative affect. The reliability was acceptable with the Omega coefficient, and the measurement invariance in gender was demonstrated. These results contribute to the potential usefulness of the EAG in Peruvian university students, recommendations for future studies are established.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45616,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ansiedad y Estres-Anxiety and Stress\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ansiedad y Estres-Anxiety and Stress\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5093/anyes2021a18\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ansiedad y Estres-Anxiety and Stress","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5093/anyes2021a18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本研究的目的是对一般自我效能量表(GSS)进行心理测量学检验。样本包括907名学生(53.4%为女性),年龄在17至26岁之间,来自利马大都市的公立和私立大学。测量工具为EAG和Positive and Negative Affect Scale (SPANAS)。结果通过内部结构及其与其他构念关系的有效性证据证明了该工具的单维性,表明后者与积极情感趋同,与消极情感分化。欧米茄系数的信度是可以接受的,并且证明了性别的测量不变性。这些结果有助于EAG在秘鲁大学生中潜在的有用性,并为今后的研究提出建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evidencias psicométricas de la Escala de Autoeficacia General (EAG) en universitarios peruanos
The objective of the present study was to psychometrically examine the General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSS). The sample consisted of 907 students (53.4% women) between 17 and 26 years old from public and private universities in the metropolitan city of Lima. The measurement instruments were the EAG and the Positive and Negative Affect Scale (SPANAS for its acronym in English). The results demonstrated the unidimensionality of the instrument through the evidence of validity of the internal structure and its relationship with other constructs, demonstrating in the latter a convergence with positive affect and divergence with negative affect. The reliability was acceptable with the Omega coefficient, and the measurement invariance in gender was demonstrated. These results contribute to the potential usefulness of the EAG in Peruvian university students, recommendations for future studies are established.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ansiedad y Estres-Anxiety and Stress
Ansiedad y Estres-Anxiety and Stress PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
8.30%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
Factor structure and reliability of the Lasher and Faulkender’s Anxiety about Aging Scale in Mexican adults Ansiedad precompetitiva y habilidades psicológicas relacionadas con el rendimiento deportivo How to evaluate coping strategies for stressful situations? Validation of the CSI in a Spanish university population Propiedades psicométricas del Cuestionario de Ansiedad Social para Adultos (CASO) en población Dominicana Diseño y validación de un cuestionario para la detección de Abusos Sexuales Infantiles en personas adultas con adicción
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1