基于正念疗法治疗强迫症的有效性评估。系统回顾

IF 0.5 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Ansiedad y Estres-Anxiety and Stress Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.5093/anyes2021a2
S. Usero, J. A. Cruzado
{"title":"基于正念疗法治疗强迫症的有效性评估。系统回顾","authors":"S. Usero, J. A. Cruzado","doi":"10.5093/anyes2021a2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction and Objectives: Mindfulness-based interventions might be equally helpful for obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD), with equal or better results than standard treatments. A systematic review is conducted to assess the efficacy and applicability of a Mindfulness Intervention for OCD symptoms. Materials and Method: Thirteen studies (2008-2020) were selected, from the bases PsycINFO, Scopus, EBSCO, Web of Knowledge, CINAHL and PSICODOC. Results: Seven studies obtained an improvement in symptoms compared to the control group, but only in 3 was this change related to differences in Mindfulness. Conclusions: The amount of methodological problems and the Mindfulness research premature state makes the exhibited results as inconclusive. Better methodological and clinical standards are necessary for future research, which include better methodological and clinical standards, is necessary.","PeriodicalId":45616,"journal":{"name":"Ansiedad y Estres-Anxiety and Stress","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Valoración de la eficacia de la Terapia Basada en Mindfulness para el trastorno obsesivo compulsivo. Una revisión sistemática\",\"authors\":\"S. Usero, J. A. Cruzado\",\"doi\":\"10.5093/anyes2021a2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction and Objectives: Mindfulness-based interventions might be equally helpful for obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD), with equal or better results than standard treatments. A systematic review is conducted to assess the efficacy and applicability of a Mindfulness Intervention for OCD symptoms. Materials and Method: Thirteen studies (2008-2020) were selected, from the bases PsycINFO, Scopus, EBSCO, Web of Knowledge, CINAHL and PSICODOC. Results: Seven studies obtained an improvement in symptoms compared to the control group, but only in 3 was this change related to differences in Mindfulness. Conclusions: The amount of methodological problems and the Mindfulness research premature state makes the exhibited results as inconclusive. Better methodological and clinical standards are necessary for future research, which include better methodological and clinical standards, is necessary.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45616,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ansiedad y Estres-Anxiety and Stress\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ansiedad y Estres-Anxiety and Stress\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5093/anyes2021a2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ansiedad y Estres-Anxiety and Stress","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5093/anyes2021a2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

简介和目的:基于正念的干预可能对强迫症(OCD)同样有帮助,其结果与标准治疗相同或更好。本研究对正念干预治疗强迫症的有效性和适用性进行了系统评价。材料与方法:从PsycINFO、Scopus、EBSCO、Web of Knowledge、CINAHL、PSICODOC等数据库中选取2008-2020年的13篇研究。结果:与对照组相比,7项研究的症状有所改善,但只有3项研究的这种变化与正念的差异有关。结论:方法学上的问题和正念研究的不成熟状态使得展示的结果不具有结论性。未来的研究需要更好的方法和临床标准,包括更好的方法和临床标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Valoración de la eficacia de la Terapia Basada en Mindfulness para el trastorno obsesivo compulsivo. Una revisión sistemática
Introduction and Objectives: Mindfulness-based interventions might be equally helpful for obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD), with equal or better results than standard treatments. A systematic review is conducted to assess the efficacy and applicability of a Mindfulness Intervention for OCD symptoms. Materials and Method: Thirteen studies (2008-2020) were selected, from the bases PsycINFO, Scopus, EBSCO, Web of Knowledge, CINAHL and PSICODOC. Results: Seven studies obtained an improvement in symptoms compared to the control group, but only in 3 was this change related to differences in Mindfulness. Conclusions: The amount of methodological problems and the Mindfulness research premature state makes the exhibited results as inconclusive. Better methodological and clinical standards are necessary for future research, which include better methodological and clinical standards, is necessary.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ansiedad y Estres-Anxiety and Stress
Ansiedad y Estres-Anxiety and Stress PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
8.30%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
Factor structure and reliability of the Lasher and Faulkender’s Anxiety about Aging Scale in Mexican adults Ansiedad precompetitiva y habilidades psicológicas relacionadas con el rendimiento deportivo How to evaluate coping strategies for stressful situations? Validation of the CSI in a Spanish university population Propiedades psicométricas del Cuestionario de Ansiedad Social para Adultos (CASO) en población Dominicana Diseño y validación de un cuestionario para la detección de Abusos Sexuales Infantiles en personas adultas con adicción
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1