“我是不朽的吗?”奥古斯丁在早期对话中的回应

Q4 Arts and Humanities Classica et Christiana Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.47743/cetc-2022-17.1.57
C. Calabrese, Ethel Junco
{"title":"“我是不朽的吗?”奥古斯丁在早期对话中的回应","authors":"C. Calabrese, Ethel Junco","doi":"10.47743/cetc-2022-17.1.57","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In our article we follow Augustine’s arguments in favor of the immortality of the soul, linked to the experience of Cassiciacus; methodologically, we focus the unity of discourse on the question in the first person (“Am I immortal?”) and on the Neoplatonic line of reflection. There we recognize three instances: esse cum Deo or the soul that lives by faith, non esse sine Deo or the soul that seeks wisdom without having found faith, and regressus in rationem or turn of the soul that takes up the fact of faith by the rational way. Despite the difficulty of the solutions, proportional to the size of the problem, and the predominance of the aporetic argument, the author confirms the need for an absolute starting point in reasoning. This conclusion will be the basis for the treatment of the problem in later works, providing the key to the first person in the question of immortality.","PeriodicalId":38243,"journal":{"name":"Classica et Christiana","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Am I Immortal?”. Augustine’s responses in the early dialogues\",\"authors\":\"C. Calabrese, Ethel Junco\",\"doi\":\"10.47743/cetc-2022-17.1.57\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In our article we follow Augustine’s arguments in favor of the immortality of the soul, linked to the experience of Cassiciacus; methodologically, we focus the unity of discourse on the question in the first person (“Am I immortal?”) and on the Neoplatonic line of reflection. There we recognize three instances: esse cum Deo or the soul that lives by faith, non esse sine Deo or the soul that seeks wisdom without having found faith, and regressus in rationem or turn of the soul that takes up the fact of faith by the rational way. Despite the difficulty of the solutions, proportional to the size of the problem, and the predominance of the aporetic argument, the author confirms the need for an absolute starting point in reasoning. This conclusion will be the basis for the treatment of the problem in later works, providing the key to the first person in the question of immortality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38243,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Classica et Christiana\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Classica et Christiana\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47743/cetc-2022-17.1.57\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Classica et Christiana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47743/cetc-2022-17.1.57","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在我们的文章中,我们遵循奥古斯丁的论点,支持灵魂不朽,与卡西阿库斯的经验;在方法论上,我们将话语的统一集中在第一人称的问题(“我是不朽的吗?”)和新柏拉图主义的反思路线上。这里我们可以看到三种情况,esse cum Deo,即靠信仰生活的灵魂,non esse sine Deo,即寻求智慧却没有找到信仰的灵魂,以及regressus in rationem,即以理性的方式接受信仰事实的灵魂。尽管解决问题的难度与问题的大小成正比,而且辩论性论点占主导地位,但作者证实,在推理中需要一个绝对的起点。这一结论将成为后来作品中处理这一问题的基础,为不朽问题的第一人称提供了关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“Am I Immortal?”. Augustine’s responses in the early dialogues
In our article we follow Augustine’s arguments in favor of the immortality of the soul, linked to the experience of Cassiciacus; methodologically, we focus the unity of discourse on the question in the first person (“Am I immortal?”) and on the Neoplatonic line of reflection. There we recognize three instances: esse cum Deo or the soul that lives by faith, non esse sine Deo or the soul that seeks wisdom without having found faith, and regressus in rationem or turn of the soul that takes up the fact of faith by the rational way. Despite the difficulty of the solutions, proportional to the size of the problem, and the predominance of the aporetic argument, the author confirms the need for an absolute starting point in reasoning. This conclusion will be the basis for the treatment of the problem in later works, providing the key to the first person in the question of immortality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Classica et Christiana
Classica et Christiana Arts and Humanities-Classics
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
Spumat decolor cruore fluuius: la violenza militare nei panegirici latini [Military violence in the Latin panegirics] Prefazione [Preface] La violenza militare nella declamazione latina: un caso di studio [Military violence in the latin declamation: a case study] Introduzione [Introduction] El fenómeno de la violencia militar en la literatura técnica latina [The phenomenon of military violence in Latin technical literature]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1