{"title":"“我是不朽的吗?”奥古斯丁在早期对话中的回应","authors":"C. Calabrese, Ethel Junco","doi":"10.47743/cetc-2022-17.1.57","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In our article we follow Augustine’s arguments in favor of the immortality of the soul, linked to the experience of Cassiciacus; methodologically, we focus the unity of discourse on the question in the first person (“Am I immortal?”) and on the Neoplatonic line of reflection. There we recognize three instances: esse cum Deo or the soul that lives by faith, non esse sine Deo or the soul that seeks wisdom without having found faith, and regressus in rationem or turn of the soul that takes up the fact of faith by the rational way. Despite the difficulty of the solutions, proportional to the size of the problem, and the predominance of the aporetic argument, the author confirms the need for an absolute starting point in reasoning. This conclusion will be the basis for the treatment of the problem in later works, providing the key to the first person in the question of immortality.","PeriodicalId":38243,"journal":{"name":"Classica et Christiana","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Am I Immortal?”. Augustine’s responses in the early dialogues\",\"authors\":\"C. Calabrese, Ethel Junco\",\"doi\":\"10.47743/cetc-2022-17.1.57\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In our article we follow Augustine’s arguments in favor of the immortality of the soul, linked to the experience of Cassiciacus; methodologically, we focus the unity of discourse on the question in the first person (“Am I immortal?”) and on the Neoplatonic line of reflection. There we recognize three instances: esse cum Deo or the soul that lives by faith, non esse sine Deo or the soul that seeks wisdom without having found faith, and regressus in rationem or turn of the soul that takes up the fact of faith by the rational way. Despite the difficulty of the solutions, proportional to the size of the problem, and the predominance of the aporetic argument, the author confirms the need for an absolute starting point in reasoning. This conclusion will be the basis for the treatment of the problem in later works, providing the key to the first person in the question of immortality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38243,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Classica et Christiana\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Classica et Christiana\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47743/cetc-2022-17.1.57\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Classica et Christiana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47743/cetc-2022-17.1.57","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在我们的文章中,我们遵循奥古斯丁的论点,支持灵魂不朽,与卡西阿库斯的经验;在方法论上,我们将话语的统一集中在第一人称的问题(“我是不朽的吗?”)和新柏拉图主义的反思路线上。这里我们可以看到三种情况,esse cum Deo,即靠信仰生活的灵魂,non esse sine Deo,即寻求智慧却没有找到信仰的灵魂,以及regressus in rationem,即以理性的方式接受信仰事实的灵魂。尽管解决问题的难度与问题的大小成正比,而且辩论性论点占主导地位,但作者证实,在推理中需要一个绝对的起点。这一结论将成为后来作品中处理这一问题的基础,为不朽问题的第一人称提供了关键。
“Am I Immortal?”. Augustine’s responses in the early dialogues
In our article we follow Augustine’s arguments in favor of the immortality of the soul, linked to the experience of Cassiciacus; methodologically, we focus the unity of discourse on the question in the first person (“Am I immortal?”) and on the Neoplatonic line of reflection. There we recognize three instances: esse cum Deo or the soul that lives by faith, non esse sine Deo or the soul that seeks wisdom without having found faith, and regressus in rationem or turn of the soul that takes up the fact of faith by the rational way. Despite the difficulty of the solutions, proportional to the size of the problem, and the predominance of the aporetic argument, the author confirms the need for an absolute starting point in reasoning. This conclusion will be the basis for the treatment of the problem in later works, providing the key to the first person in the question of immortality.