{"title":"在ivv时代的拉丁墓志铭中,政治思想。罗马历史的统一和独特性","authors":"N. Zugravu","doi":"10.47743/cetc-2022-17.2.617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Political ideas in Latin breuiaria from the 4 th -5 th cen-turies. The unity and uniqueness of Roman history . In Late Antiquity the breuiaria enjoyed a very wide diffusion in the field of literature, historiography, theology, law, military art, etc. The paper focuses on the historiographical breuiaria , especially Historiae abbreviatae by Aurelius Victor (ca. 358-360/1), Breuiarium ab Vrbe condita by Eutropius (369), Breuiarium rerum gestarum populi Romani by Rufius Festus (369-370), Epitome of Caesaribus composed by an anony-mous person in the first years of the 5th century. The purpose of our analysis is to highlight the way in which these writings reflect the evolution of the main ideas circulated in the IV-V centuries. In this sense, it can be appreciated that, although in a less developed and analytical way than other writings, the brevias capture the general course of thought of the time: from the “iconicity” of Rome to the recognition of the imperial character of Constantinople; from the anti-barbarian sentiment to the possibility of “Romanization” of the barbarians; from aggressive imperialism to defensive and pacifism; from imperium indiuisum to veiled criti-cism and, finally, acceptance of the division of the state; from imperium sine fine to imperium restitutum ; from din urm ă , acceptarea diviz ă rii statului; de la imperium sine fine la imperium restitutum ; de la „neutralitate” religioas ă la a-p ă rare prudent ă a p ă gânismului ș i recunoa ș tere tacit ă a suprema ț iei cre ș tinis-mului; „romanocentrismul”; legitimismul monarhic; conceptul de princeps bonus ș În acest text sunt discutate modalit ăț ile prin care autorii lucr ă rilor amintite subliniaz ă unitatea ș i unicitatea istoriei Romei. Au fost identificate dou ă modalit ăț i: prima este una programatic ă , explicit ă . Cea de-a doua este indirect ă , realizat ă prin mai multe procedee: raportarea constant ă la fundarea Romei; recursul la exempla regum ; apelul la constantele catehismului civic ș i moral republican; leg ă tura realizat ă , prin intermediul persoanei suveranului, între „trecutul recent” ( immediate past ) ș i prezentul tardoantic. Breuiaria atest ă faptul c ă în a doua ju-m ă tate a secolului al IV-lea ș i în prima decad ă a celui urm ă tor con ș tiin ț a diviziu-nii statului roman era absent ă . dum animus potentiae expers, inedia refecti, insatia-bilis Quo uidetur superbiam quae, gentis agitatur, eminere paululum 21-22: sotto II Megas a.C.) Gneo Pompeo nel a.C.: genti magno apud regem dedit. Quod","PeriodicalId":38243,"journal":{"name":"Classica et Christiana","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Idee politiche negli epitomatori latini dei secoli IV-V. L’unità e l’unicità della storia romana\",\"authors\":\"N. Zugravu\",\"doi\":\"10.47743/cetc-2022-17.2.617\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": Political ideas in Latin breuiaria from the 4 th -5 th cen-turies. The unity and uniqueness of Roman history . In Late Antiquity the breuiaria enjoyed a very wide diffusion in the field of literature, historiography, theology, law, military art, etc. The paper focuses on the historiographical breuiaria , especially Historiae abbreviatae by Aurelius Victor (ca. 358-360/1), Breuiarium ab Vrbe condita by Eutropius (369), Breuiarium rerum gestarum populi Romani by Rufius Festus (369-370), Epitome of Caesaribus composed by an anony-mous person in the first years of the 5th century. The purpose of our analysis is to highlight the way in which these writings reflect the evolution of the main ideas circulated in the IV-V centuries. In this sense, it can be appreciated that, although in a less developed and analytical way than other writings, the brevias capture the general course of thought of the time: from the “iconicity” of Rome to the recognition of the imperial character of Constantinople; from the anti-barbarian sentiment to the possibility of “Romanization” of the barbarians; from aggressive imperialism to defensive and pacifism; from imperium indiuisum to veiled criti-cism and, finally, acceptance of the division of the state; from imperium sine fine to imperium restitutum ; from din urm ă , acceptarea diviz ă rii statului; de la imperium sine fine la imperium restitutum ; de la „neutralitate” religioas ă la a-p ă rare prudent ă a p ă gânismului ș i recunoa ș tere tacit ă a suprema ț iei cre ș tinis-mului; „romanocentrismul”; legitimismul monarhic; conceptul de princeps bonus ș În acest text sunt discutate modalit ăț ile prin care autorii lucr ă rilor amintite subliniaz ă unitatea ș i unicitatea istoriei Romei. Au fost identificate dou ă modalit ăț i: prima este una programatic ă , explicit ă . Cea de-a doua este indirect ă , realizat ă prin mai multe procedee: raportarea constant ă la fundarea Romei; recursul la exempla regum ; apelul la constantele catehismului civic ș i moral republican; leg ă tura realizat ă , prin intermediul persoanei suveranului, între „trecutul recent” ( immediate past ) ș i prezentul tardoantic. Breuiaria atest ă faptul c ă în a doua ju-m ă tate a secolului al IV-lea ș i în prima decad ă a celui urm ă tor con ș tiin ț a diviziu-nii statului roman era absent ă . dum animus potentiae expers, inedia refecti, insatia-bilis Quo uidetur superbiam quae, gentis agitatur, eminere paululum 21-22: sotto II Megas a.C.) Gneo Pompeo nel a.C.: genti magno apud regem dedit. Quod\",\"PeriodicalId\":38243,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Classica et Christiana\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Classica et Christiana\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47743/cetc-2022-17.2.617\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Classica et Christiana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47743/cetc-2022-17.2.617","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
4世纪至5世纪拉丁文中的政治思想。罗马历史的统一性和独特性。在古代晚期,布鲁里亚语在文学、史学、神学、法律、军事艺术等领域广泛传播。本文主要对奥勒利乌斯·维克托(约358-360/1)的《简史》、欧特罗皮乌斯(约369)的《关于Vrbe condita的breuarium ab Vrbe condita》、鲁菲乌斯·费斯图斯(369-370)的《罗马平民的breuarium rerum gestarum populi Romani》、公元5世纪初佚名撰写的《凯撒里布斯的缩影》等史学著述进行了评述。我们分析的目的是强调这些著作反映四、五世纪流传的主要思想演变的方式。从这个意义上说,可以理解的是,尽管比其他著作更不发达和分析的方式,短祷捕捉了当时的一般思想过程:从罗马的“象似性”到君士坦丁堡的帝国特征的承认;从反蛮族情绪到蛮族“罗马化”的可能性;从侵略帝国主义到防御和平主义;从个人统治权到隐晦的批判,最后接受国家的分裂;从帝国罚款到帝国归还;来自dinurm - u, acceptarea diz - ii statului;De la imperium sin fine la imperium restitutum;“中立”的宗教:“审慎”的宗教:“审慎”的宗教:“审慎”的宗教:“审慎”的宗教:“理性”的宗教:“理性”的宗教:“理性”的宗教:“理性”的宗教:“理性”的宗教:“理性”的宗教:“理性”的宗教:“理性”的宗教:“理性”的宗教;“romanocentrismul”;legitimismul monarhic;概念上的原则,红利,În,访问文本,讨论模态的原则,原则,权力,原则,原则,原则,原则,原则,原则,原则,原则,原则,原则,原则,原则,原则,原则,原则,原则,原则,原则,原则,原则,原则。因此,我们必须确定一种模式模式:首先是方案模式,明确模式。Cea de-a doua este间接管理,实现多流程管理;raporarea constant = la fundarea Romei;Recursul la exempla regum;公民共和是道德共和;legu tura realizei, priin intermediate personanei suveranului, ntre“trecutul recent”(刚刚过去)和prepretul tardoantic。布鲁里亚(Breuiaria)的最新研究表明,它是一种新的研究方法,它是一种新的研究方法,它是一种新的研究方法,它是一种新的研究方法。【中文译文】:杜曼尼斯潜力专家,媒介反射,贪得无厌-bilis Quo uider superbiam quae, gentis agitur, eminere paululum 21-22; sotto II Megas a.C。格尼奥·蓬佩奥·奈尔:我的名字叫“我的名字”,我的名字叫“我的名字”。监狱
Idee politiche negli epitomatori latini dei secoli IV-V. L’unità e l’unicità della storia romana
: Political ideas in Latin breuiaria from the 4 th -5 th cen-turies. The unity and uniqueness of Roman history . In Late Antiquity the breuiaria enjoyed a very wide diffusion in the field of literature, historiography, theology, law, military art, etc. The paper focuses on the historiographical breuiaria , especially Historiae abbreviatae by Aurelius Victor (ca. 358-360/1), Breuiarium ab Vrbe condita by Eutropius (369), Breuiarium rerum gestarum populi Romani by Rufius Festus (369-370), Epitome of Caesaribus composed by an anony-mous person in the first years of the 5th century. The purpose of our analysis is to highlight the way in which these writings reflect the evolution of the main ideas circulated in the IV-V centuries. In this sense, it can be appreciated that, although in a less developed and analytical way than other writings, the brevias capture the general course of thought of the time: from the “iconicity” of Rome to the recognition of the imperial character of Constantinople; from the anti-barbarian sentiment to the possibility of “Romanization” of the barbarians; from aggressive imperialism to defensive and pacifism; from imperium indiuisum to veiled criti-cism and, finally, acceptance of the division of the state; from imperium sine fine to imperium restitutum ; from din urm ă , acceptarea diviz ă rii statului; de la imperium sine fine la imperium restitutum ; de la „neutralitate” religioas ă la a-p ă rare prudent ă a p ă gânismului ș i recunoa ș tere tacit ă a suprema ț iei cre ș tinis-mului; „romanocentrismul”; legitimismul monarhic; conceptul de princeps bonus ș În acest text sunt discutate modalit ăț ile prin care autorii lucr ă rilor amintite subliniaz ă unitatea ș i unicitatea istoriei Romei. Au fost identificate dou ă modalit ăț i: prima este una programatic ă , explicit ă . Cea de-a doua este indirect ă , realizat ă prin mai multe procedee: raportarea constant ă la fundarea Romei; recursul la exempla regum ; apelul la constantele catehismului civic ș i moral republican; leg ă tura realizat ă , prin intermediul persoanei suveranului, între „trecutul recent” ( immediate past ) ș i prezentul tardoantic. Breuiaria atest ă faptul c ă în a doua ju-m ă tate a secolului al IV-lea ș i în prima decad ă a celui urm ă tor con ș tiin ț a diviziu-nii statului roman era absent ă . dum animus potentiae expers, inedia refecti, insatia-bilis Quo uidetur superbiam quae, gentis agitatur, eminere paululum 21-22: sotto II Megas a.C.) Gneo Pompeo nel a.C.: genti magno apud regem dedit. Quod