“第12条:新闻界在法律范围内享有自由。保加利亚复兴高峰时期图书文化中的审查形式

Q3 Arts and Humanities Kulturne Dejiny Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.54937/kd.2022.13.supp.53-81
Miroslav Kouba
{"title":"“第12条:新闻界在法律范围内享有自由。保加利亚复兴高峰时期图书文化中的审查形式","authors":"Miroslav Kouba","doi":"10.54937/kd.2022.13.supp.53-81","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The formation of modern ethnic and cultural identities in non-state communities is a process that, in addition to general assumptions, also required increased cultivation of the institutional backdrop of the given national movement. In the case of the Bulgarian national revival, one of the characteristic features is the systematic and long-term absence of domestic printing presses, which during almost the entire 19th century limited the development of book culture. A key factor in this cultural situation is not only the weak representation of cultural elites, but also the systematically enforced legislative measures by the Ottoman state, which prevented the establishment of a polygraphic center on Bulgarian territory. For this reason, the printing of nearly all production of Bulgarian books and periodicals was realized outside the Bulgarian lands until the late 1870s. The Tanzimat reforms also had a paradoxical effect, in the context of which the Turkish Press Act came into force. Based on it, the initial prerequisites were created for the gradually introduced censorship, which concerned the entire Ottoman Empire. As part of it, applications for the establishment of printing presses, which were systematically rejected for the Bulgarian lands, were also under thorough control. This paper therefore tries to present a basic typology of censorship measures, which it follows on two basic levels – in the aspects of the external and internal effects of the Ottoman power, at the same time pointing out the fact that the traditions of freedom of speech were not established either during the so-called national revival or after the introduction of the Ottoman constitution from 1876, or even after the liberation of Bulgaria in 1878.","PeriodicalId":37774,"journal":{"name":"Kulturne Dejiny","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"„Článek 12: tisk je svobodný v mezích zákona.“ Podoby cenzury v knižní kultuře vrcholných fází bulharského obrození\",\"authors\":\"Miroslav Kouba\",\"doi\":\"10.54937/kd.2022.13.supp.53-81\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The formation of modern ethnic and cultural identities in non-state communities is a process that, in addition to general assumptions, also required increased cultivation of the institutional backdrop of the given national movement. In the case of the Bulgarian national revival, one of the characteristic features is the systematic and long-term absence of domestic printing presses, which during almost the entire 19th century limited the development of book culture. A key factor in this cultural situation is not only the weak representation of cultural elites, but also the systematically enforced legislative measures by the Ottoman state, which prevented the establishment of a polygraphic center on Bulgarian territory. For this reason, the printing of nearly all production of Bulgarian books and periodicals was realized outside the Bulgarian lands until the late 1870s. The Tanzimat reforms also had a paradoxical effect, in the context of which the Turkish Press Act came into force. Based on it, the initial prerequisites were created for the gradually introduced censorship, which concerned the entire Ottoman Empire. As part of it, applications for the establishment of printing presses, which were systematically rejected for the Bulgarian lands, were also under thorough control. This paper therefore tries to present a basic typology of censorship measures, which it follows on two basic levels – in the aspects of the external and internal effects of the Ottoman power, at the same time pointing out the fact that the traditions of freedom of speech were not established either during the so-called national revival or after the introduction of the Ottoman constitution from 1876, or even after the liberation of Bulgaria in 1878.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37774,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kulturne Dejiny\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kulturne Dejiny\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54937/kd.2022.13.supp.53-81\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kulturne Dejiny","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54937/kd.2022.13.supp.53-81","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在非国家社区中形成现代种族和文化身份是一个过程,除了一般假设之外,还需要增加对特定民族运动的制度背景的培养。在保加利亚民族复兴的情况下,一个特点是国内印刷机的系统和长期缺乏,这在几乎整个19世纪限制了图书文化的发展。造成这种文化状况的一个关键因素不仅是文化精英的代表性薄弱,而且是奥斯曼帝国有系统地实施的立法措施,这阻止了在保加利亚领土上建立一个测谎中心。因此,直到19世纪70年代末,几乎所有保加利亚书籍和期刊的印刷都是在保加利亚境外完成的。坦齐马特改革也产生了自相矛盾的效果,在此背景下,《土耳其新闻法》开始生效。在此基础上,为逐渐引入的审查制度创造了最初的先决条件,这关系到整个奥斯曼帝国。作为其中的一部分,在保加利亚土地上建立印刷机的申请曾被有计划地拒绝,现在也受到彻底控制。因此,本文试图呈现一种审查措施的基本类型,它遵循两个基本层面-奥斯曼政权的外部和内部影响方面,同时指出言论自由的传统既不是在所谓的民族复兴期间建立起来的,也不是在1876年引入奥斯曼宪法之后建立起来的,甚至是在1878年保加利亚解放之后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
„Článek 12: tisk je svobodný v mezích zákona.“ Podoby cenzury v knižní kultuře vrcholných fází bulharského obrození
The formation of modern ethnic and cultural identities in non-state communities is a process that, in addition to general assumptions, also required increased cultivation of the institutional backdrop of the given national movement. In the case of the Bulgarian national revival, one of the characteristic features is the systematic and long-term absence of domestic printing presses, which during almost the entire 19th century limited the development of book culture. A key factor in this cultural situation is not only the weak representation of cultural elites, but also the systematically enforced legislative measures by the Ottoman state, which prevented the establishment of a polygraphic center on Bulgarian territory. For this reason, the printing of nearly all production of Bulgarian books and periodicals was realized outside the Bulgarian lands until the late 1870s. The Tanzimat reforms also had a paradoxical effect, in the context of which the Turkish Press Act came into force. Based on it, the initial prerequisites were created for the gradually introduced censorship, which concerned the entire Ottoman Empire. As part of it, applications for the establishment of printing presses, which were systematically rejected for the Bulgarian lands, were also under thorough control. This paper therefore tries to present a basic typology of censorship measures, which it follows on two basic levels – in the aspects of the external and internal effects of the Ottoman power, at the same time pointing out the fact that the traditions of freedom of speech were not established either during the so-called national revival or after the introduction of the Ottoman constitution from 1876, or even after the liberation of Bulgaria in 1878.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Kulturne Dejiny
Kulturne Dejiny Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Cultural History (ISSN 1338-2209) is a peer-reviewed journal focused on history and anthropology. When we talk about the “cultural history”, we mean a wide scale of themes that are connected with acultural activities of man in the past. Issued semiannually, the journal deals with history in a broad sense up to its intersection with sociology, philosophy, theology, fine arts, and linguistics in all historical periods up to the present. Even though it is not territorially limited, the journal zeros in on the Central European region more precisely. Accepted languages are Slovak, Czech, Polish, English and German (papers in other languages will be translated).
期刊最新文献
Pavel Žiška ako „večný“ kandidát na biskupa K reflexi pastýřského listu slovenských biskupů z roku 1924 Československou stranou národně socialistickou Vývoj vzťahu Andreja Cvinčeka k episkopátu vo svetle jeho politickej činnosti pred prvou svetovou vojnou, v medzivojnovom období a v rokoch 1945 – 1948 Politická spolupráca Andreja Cvinčeka a Jana Šrámka vo svetle nespracovanej osobnej korešpondencie z rokov 1927 – 1929 Slovanství a jeho kult v československém prostředí 40. let 20. století
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1