I. Ristić, Sanja Andrić-Petrović, S. Jerotić, M. Zebić, N. Jovanović, N. Marić
{"title":"塞尔维亚精神病谱系障碍患者的精神科就诊时间:DIALOG+社会心理干预是否显著延长?","authors":"I. Ristić, Sanja Andrić-Petrović, S. Jerotić, M. Zebić, N. Jovanović, N. Marić","doi":"10.5937/PSIHDAN2001013R","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite national and international guidelines recommending inclusion of psychotherapy and psychosocial interventions as regular part of treatment for patients with psychosis spectrum disorders (PSD), outpatient psychiatric care in Southeastern Europe (SEE) is mostly limited to medication prescription. DIALOG+ is a recently developed technology-based, patient centered psychosocial intervention that provides an economically viable intervention for treatment and comprehensive evaluation of multiple life domains. Its effectiveness in a range of psychiatric disorders has been shown in several studies conducted in high-income countries. Before an ongoing study evaluating DIALOG+ implementation and effectiveness in developing SEE countries is completed, we aimed to explore general impressions of mental health clinicians towards such an intervention and to compare the duration of treatment as usual (TAU) with DIALOG+ enriched appointments of PSD outpatients. The attendees of the national professional educational symposium were presented with DIALOG+, after which they completed a short survey on their general impressions towards the intervention. To obtain the information regarding duration of psychiatric appointments for patients with PSD in Serbia, we used data from a currently ongoing randomized clinical trial where DIALOG+ is being tested for effectiveness. The impressions of the survey (n=110) from mostly psychiatrists and psychiatry residents towards the concept of this intervention were overwhelmingly positive. However, the question arose if TAU is being prolonged by DIALOG+ to the extent that might limit its implementation. Although significant difference in average session duration was observed between DIALOG+ and TAU (31.96±16.47 vs. 19.75±6.11 minutes, p<0.01), providing structured interventions and patient evaluation might be of additional benefit for long term care and quality of life of PSD patients. To the best of our knowledge, this was the first evaluation of the duration of psychiatric appointments for outpatients with PSD in Serbia. Present information could be useful for different stakeholders in education of MH workers and implementation of DIALOG+ in the local settings.","PeriodicalId":31896,"journal":{"name":"Psihijatrija Danas","volume":"52 1","pages":"13-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Duration of psychiatric appointments for patients with Psychosis spectrum disorders in Serbia: Is it significantly prolonged by DIALOG+ psychosocial intervention?\",\"authors\":\"I. Ristić, Sanja Andrić-Petrović, S. Jerotić, M. Zebić, N. Jovanović, N. Marić\",\"doi\":\"10.5937/PSIHDAN2001013R\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Despite national and international guidelines recommending inclusion of psychotherapy and psychosocial interventions as regular part of treatment for patients with psychosis spectrum disorders (PSD), outpatient psychiatric care in Southeastern Europe (SEE) is mostly limited to medication prescription. DIALOG+ is a recently developed technology-based, patient centered psychosocial intervention that provides an economically viable intervention for treatment and comprehensive evaluation of multiple life domains. Its effectiveness in a range of psychiatric disorders has been shown in several studies conducted in high-income countries. Before an ongoing study evaluating DIALOG+ implementation and effectiveness in developing SEE countries is completed, we aimed to explore general impressions of mental health clinicians towards such an intervention and to compare the duration of treatment as usual (TAU) with DIALOG+ enriched appointments of PSD outpatients. The attendees of the national professional educational symposium were presented with DIALOG+, after which they completed a short survey on their general impressions towards the intervention. To obtain the information regarding duration of psychiatric appointments for patients with PSD in Serbia, we used data from a currently ongoing randomized clinical trial where DIALOG+ is being tested for effectiveness. The impressions of the survey (n=110) from mostly psychiatrists and psychiatry residents towards the concept of this intervention were overwhelmingly positive. However, the question arose if TAU is being prolonged by DIALOG+ to the extent that might limit its implementation. Although significant difference in average session duration was observed between DIALOG+ and TAU (31.96±16.47 vs. 19.75±6.11 minutes, p<0.01), providing structured interventions and patient evaluation might be of additional benefit for long term care and quality of life of PSD patients. To the best of our knowledge, this was the first evaluation of the duration of psychiatric appointments for outpatients with PSD in Serbia. Present information could be useful for different stakeholders in education of MH workers and implementation of DIALOG+ in the local settings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31896,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psihijatrija Danas\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"13-24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psihijatrija Danas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5937/PSIHDAN2001013R\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psihijatrija Danas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/PSIHDAN2001013R","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
尽管国家和国际指南建议将心理治疗和社会心理干预作为精神病谱系障碍(PSD)患者治疗的常规部分,但东南欧(SEE)的门诊精神科护理大多局限于药物处方。DIALOG+是最近开发的以技术为基础,以患者为中心的社会心理干预,为多种生命领域的治疗和综合评估提供经济上可行的干预。在高收入国家进行的几项研究表明,它对一系列精神疾病有效。在一项正在进行的评估DIALOG+在发展中SEE国家实施和有效性的研究完成之前,我们的目的是探索心理健康临床医生对这种干预措施的总体印象,并比较常规治疗(TAU)与DIALOG+门诊患者预约的PSD门诊时间。全国专业教育研讨会的与会者获得了DIALOG+,之后他们完成了关于他们对干预的总体印象的简短调查。为了获得塞尔维亚PSD患者精神科预约时间的信息,我们使用了目前正在进行的一项随机临床试验的数据,该试验正在测试DIALOG+的有效性。调查的印象(n=110),大多数精神科医生和精神科住院医师对这种干预的概念是压倒性的积极。然而,问题出现了,如果TAU被DIALOG+延长到可能限制其实施的程度。虽然DIALOG+和TAU的平均疗程时间有显著差异(31.96±16.47 vs. 19.75±6.11分钟,p<0.01),但提供结构化干预和患者评估可能对PSD患者的长期护理和生活质量有额外的好处。据我们所知,这是第一次对塞尔维亚精神病患者门诊就诊时间的评估。目前的信息可能对不同的利益相关者在妇幼保健工作者的教育和在当地实施DIALOG+有用。
Duration of psychiatric appointments for patients with Psychosis spectrum disorders in Serbia: Is it significantly prolonged by DIALOG+ psychosocial intervention?
Despite national and international guidelines recommending inclusion of psychotherapy and psychosocial interventions as regular part of treatment for patients with psychosis spectrum disorders (PSD), outpatient psychiatric care in Southeastern Europe (SEE) is mostly limited to medication prescription. DIALOG+ is a recently developed technology-based, patient centered psychosocial intervention that provides an economically viable intervention for treatment and comprehensive evaluation of multiple life domains. Its effectiveness in a range of psychiatric disorders has been shown in several studies conducted in high-income countries. Before an ongoing study evaluating DIALOG+ implementation and effectiveness in developing SEE countries is completed, we aimed to explore general impressions of mental health clinicians towards such an intervention and to compare the duration of treatment as usual (TAU) with DIALOG+ enriched appointments of PSD outpatients. The attendees of the national professional educational symposium were presented with DIALOG+, after which they completed a short survey on their general impressions towards the intervention. To obtain the information regarding duration of psychiatric appointments for patients with PSD in Serbia, we used data from a currently ongoing randomized clinical trial where DIALOG+ is being tested for effectiveness. The impressions of the survey (n=110) from mostly psychiatrists and psychiatry residents towards the concept of this intervention were overwhelmingly positive. However, the question arose if TAU is being prolonged by DIALOG+ to the extent that might limit its implementation. Although significant difference in average session duration was observed between DIALOG+ and TAU (31.96±16.47 vs. 19.75±6.11 minutes, p<0.01), providing structured interventions and patient evaluation might be of additional benefit for long term care and quality of life of PSD patients. To the best of our knowledge, this was the first evaluation of the duration of psychiatric appointments for outpatients with PSD in Serbia. Present information could be useful for different stakeholders in education of MH workers and implementation of DIALOG+ in the local settings.