对印度尼西亚北苏门答腊一家三级医院新生儿重症监护室脓毒症抗生素处方的评估

IF 0.5 Q4 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE Family Medicine and Primary Care Review Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.5114/fmpcr.2021.108200
A. Pasaribu, Beby Syofiani, F. Fahmi, Fauzan Dalimunthe, M. Nasution, S. Pasaribu
{"title":"对印度尼西亚北苏门答腊一家三级医院新生儿重症监护室脓毒症抗生素处方的评估","authors":"A. Pasaribu, Beby Syofiani, F. Fahmi, Fauzan Dalimunthe, M. Nasution, S. Pasaribu","doi":"10.5114/fmpcr.2021.108200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Neonatal sepsis is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. The evaluation of antibiotic prescription in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) is important for reducing inappropriate antibiotic use and minimizing the development of antibiotic resistance. Antimicrobial stewardship programs potentially promote a prudent use of antibiotics; however, the approach in NICUs is not yet optimal. Objectives. The aim of our study was to evaluate antibiotic prescriptions for neonatal sepsis in a tertiary hospital in North Sumatera, indonesia. Material and methods. In our retrospective study, we collected data from medical records and enrolled 324 neonatal sepsis patients who received one or more antibiotics. Results. Gentamycin and cefotaxime were the two most common antibiotics prescribed in the NICU (72.22% and 71.60%, respectively). However, high levels of resistance to gentamycin and cefotaxime were found among common pathogens circulating in the NICU (55.56% and 82.81%, respectively). Only 40.33% of the antibiotic prescriptions were appropriate: approximately 15.11% of the patients had received antibiotics with incorrect indications and 16.16% of the antibiotics had been administered without sufficient duration. Conclusions. The appropriate use of antibiotic prescriptions in the NICU was low, which may lead to high mortality in neonatal sepsis patients. Continued evaluation of antibiotic usage by implementing antimicrobial stewardship programs in the NICU is important.","PeriodicalId":44481,"journal":{"name":"Family Medicine and Primary Care Review","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of antibiotic prescriptions for sepsis in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit in a Tertiary Hospital in North Sumatera, Indonesia\",\"authors\":\"A. Pasaribu, Beby Syofiani, F. Fahmi, Fauzan Dalimunthe, M. Nasution, S. Pasaribu\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/fmpcr.2021.108200\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background. Neonatal sepsis is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. The evaluation of antibiotic prescription in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) is important for reducing inappropriate antibiotic use and minimizing the development of antibiotic resistance. Antimicrobial stewardship programs potentially promote a prudent use of antibiotics; however, the approach in NICUs is not yet optimal. Objectives. The aim of our study was to evaluate antibiotic prescriptions for neonatal sepsis in a tertiary hospital in North Sumatera, indonesia. Material and methods. In our retrospective study, we collected data from medical records and enrolled 324 neonatal sepsis patients who received one or more antibiotics. Results. Gentamycin and cefotaxime were the two most common antibiotics prescribed in the NICU (72.22% and 71.60%, respectively). However, high levels of resistance to gentamycin and cefotaxime were found among common pathogens circulating in the NICU (55.56% and 82.81%, respectively). Only 40.33% of the antibiotic prescriptions were appropriate: approximately 15.11% of the patients had received antibiotics with incorrect indications and 16.16% of the antibiotics had been administered without sufficient duration. Conclusions. The appropriate use of antibiotic prescriptions in the NICU was low, which may lead to high mortality in neonatal sepsis patients. Continued evaluation of antibiotic usage by implementing antimicrobial stewardship programs in the NICU is important.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44481,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Family Medicine and Primary Care Review\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Family Medicine and Primary Care Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/fmpcr.2021.108200\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Medicine and Primary Care Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/fmpcr.2021.108200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景。新生儿败血症是全世界发病率和死亡率的主要原因。新生儿重症监护病房(NICUs)的抗生素处方评估对于减少不适当的抗生素使用和最大限度地减少抗生素耐药性的发展至关重要。抗菌药物管理规划可能促进谨慎使用抗生素;然而,这种方法在新生儿重症监护病房尚不理想。目标。本研究的目的是评估印度尼西亚北苏门答腊一家三级医院治疗新生儿脓毒症的抗生素处方。材料和方法。在我们的回顾性研究中,我们从医疗记录中收集数据,并纳入了324例接受一种或多种抗生素治疗的新生儿败血症患者。结果。庆大霉素和头孢噻肟是NICU最常用的两种抗生素(分别占72.22%和71.60%)。然而,NICU常见病原菌对庆大霉素和头孢噻肟的耐药性较高(分别为55.56%和82.81%)。仅40.33%的抗生素处方是正确的,约15.11%的患者使用了适应症不正确的抗生素,16.16%的患者使用时间不足。结论。新生儿重症监护室抗生素处方使用率低,可能导致新生儿败血症患者死亡率高。通过在新生儿重症监护室实施抗菌药物管理计划来持续评估抗生素的使用是很重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of antibiotic prescriptions for sepsis in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit in a Tertiary Hospital in North Sumatera, Indonesia
Background. Neonatal sepsis is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. The evaluation of antibiotic prescription in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) is important for reducing inappropriate antibiotic use and minimizing the development of antibiotic resistance. Antimicrobial stewardship programs potentially promote a prudent use of antibiotics; however, the approach in NICUs is not yet optimal. Objectives. The aim of our study was to evaluate antibiotic prescriptions for neonatal sepsis in a tertiary hospital in North Sumatera, indonesia. Material and methods. In our retrospective study, we collected data from medical records and enrolled 324 neonatal sepsis patients who received one or more antibiotics. Results. Gentamycin and cefotaxime were the two most common antibiotics prescribed in the NICU (72.22% and 71.60%, respectively). However, high levels of resistance to gentamycin and cefotaxime were found among common pathogens circulating in the NICU (55.56% and 82.81%, respectively). Only 40.33% of the antibiotic prescriptions were appropriate: approximately 15.11% of the patients had received antibiotics with incorrect indications and 16.16% of the antibiotics had been administered without sufficient duration. Conclusions. The appropriate use of antibiotic prescriptions in the NICU was low, which may lead to high mortality in neonatal sepsis patients. Continued evaluation of antibiotic usage by implementing antimicrobial stewardship programs in the NICU is important.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
14.30%
发文量
18
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The significance of awareness about iron deficiency anaemia in its prevention among Iraqi pregnant women attending primary healthcare centres Pattern of platelet indices in hypertension: a single-centre experience for a primary care setting Association of mental health and medication adherence with blood pressure control in primary care patients with hypertension: a cross-sectional study Violence against women with hearing disabilities in Tabuk, Saudi Arabia Patient satisfaction and health system responsiveness among attendants to family health centres and units affiliated with universal health insurance in Port Said Governorate
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1