伊朗医科大学学生学习习惯的系统回顾和荟萃分析

IF 0.5 Q4 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE Family Medicine and Primary Care Review Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.5114/fmpcr.2021.108204
A. Gilavand, Yasaman Emad
{"title":"伊朗医科大学学生学习习惯的系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"A. Gilavand, Yasaman Emad","doi":"10.5114/fmpcr.2021.108204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. due to the role of correct habits in students’ academic progress, this study is aimed at evaluateing students’ study habits in Iranian medical universities. Material and methods. Data collection method in this study was a systematic review and meta-analysis based on searches for articles published on reputable Iranian and international sites for words such as “study habits,” “students,” “University of Medical Sciences,” and “Iran”; it was conducted without any time limit. It used a standard questionnaire of 45 study habits by Palsane and Sharma (PSSHI). Also, in the dataj analysis, computer software R version 3.6.3 was used to estimate the average score of students’ study habits. Results. In the present study, 13 articles were reviewed, as a result of which 2,665 students who were studying at one of the Iranian medical universities from 2006 to 2018 were assessed. The overall score for students’ study habits was 49.03 out of a maximum score of 90. Similarly, eight areas of students’ study habits were calculated separately: time allocated was 5.61 out of a maximum score of 10; physical conditions was 6.94 out of a maximum score of 12; reading capability was 14.8 out of a maximum score of 16; note-taking was 3.17 out of a maximum score of 6; learning motivation was 6.93 out of a maximum score of 12; memory was 4.61 out of a maximum score of 8; taking exams was 9.92 out of a maximum score of 20; and health was 3.23 out of a maximum score of 6. Conclusions. The overall score of the students’ study habits was moderate and the score for “taking exams” was the weakest. Consequently, bearing in mind that these areas of study are related to people’s health, it is probable that these students will have study habits that are better and higher than average; the Ministry of Health, Treatment and Medical Education of Iran should consider this point. Medical universities can assess their students’ study habits before they enroll in the university, and if necessary, improve these habits by performing some educational interventions, such as organizing training courses, and using mobile educational applications, etc.","PeriodicalId":44481,"journal":{"name":"Family Medicine and Primary Care Review","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic review and meta-analysis of students’ study habits in Iranian Universities of Medical Sciences\",\"authors\":\"A. Gilavand, Yasaman Emad\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/fmpcr.2021.108204\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background. due to the role of correct habits in students’ academic progress, this study is aimed at evaluateing students’ study habits in Iranian medical universities. Material and methods. Data collection method in this study was a systematic review and meta-analysis based on searches for articles published on reputable Iranian and international sites for words such as “study habits,” “students,” “University of Medical Sciences,” and “Iran”; it was conducted without any time limit. It used a standard questionnaire of 45 study habits by Palsane and Sharma (PSSHI). Also, in the dataj analysis, computer software R version 3.6.3 was used to estimate the average score of students’ study habits. Results. In the present study, 13 articles were reviewed, as a result of which 2,665 students who were studying at one of the Iranian medical universities from 2006 to 2018 were assessed. The overall score for students’ study habits was 49.03 out of a maximum score of 90. Similarly, eight areas of students’ study habits were calculated separately: time allocated was 5.61 out of a maximum score of 10; physical conditions was 6.94 out of a maximum score of 12; reading capability was 14.8 out of a maximum score of 16; note-taking was 3.17 out of a maximum score of 6; learning motivation was 6.93 out of a maximum score of 12; memory was 4.61 out of a maximum score of 8; taking exams was 9.92 out of a maximum score of 20; and health was 3.23 out of a maximum score of 6. Conclusions. The overall score of the students’ study habits was moderate and the score for “taking exams” was the weakest. Consequently, bearing in mind that these areas of study are related to people’s health, it is probable that these students will have study habits that are better and higher than average; the Ministry of Health, Treatment and Medical Education of Iran should consider this point. Medical universities can assess their students’ study habits before they enroll in the university, and if necessary, improve these habits by performing some educational interventions, such as organizing training courses, and using mobile educational applications, etc.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44481,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Family Medicine and Primary Care Review\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Family Medicine and Primary Care Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/fmpcr.2021.108204\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Medicine and Primary Care Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/fmpcr.2021.108204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景。鉴于正确的学习习惯在学生学业进步中的作用,本研究旨在评估伊朗医科大学学生的学习习惯。材料和方法。本研究的数据收集方法是基于对发表在伊朗和国际知名网站上的文章的搜索,如“学习习惯”、“学生”、“医学大学”和“伊朗”,进行系统回顾和荟萃分析;它的进行没有任何时间限制。它使用了Palsane和Sharma (PSSHI)的45个学习习惯的标准问卷。在数据分析中,使用计算机软件R版本3.6.3来估算学生学习习惯的平均分。结果。在本研究中,审查了13篇文章,结果对2006年至2018年在伊朗一所医科大学学习的2,665名学生进行了评估。学生的学习习惯总分为49.03分,满分为90分。同样,学生学习习惯的八个方面也被分别计算:时间分配为5.61分(满分为10分);身体状况为6.94分(满分为12分);阅读能力为14.8分(满分16分);笔记得分3.17分(满分6分);学习动机为6.93分(满分12分);记忆力为4.61分(满分为8分);参加考试的成绩是9.92分(满分20分);健康得分3.23分(满分6分)。结论。学生的学习习惯总体得分一般,“应试”得分最低。因此,考虑到这些学习领域与人们的健康有关,这些学生很可能拥有比平均水平更好和更高的学习习惯;伊朗卫生、治疗和医学教育部应考虑这一点。医科大学可以在学生入学前对他们的学习习惯进行评估,并在必要时通过一些教育干预措施来改善这些习惯,例如组织培训课程,使用移动教育应用程序等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A systematic review and meta-analysis of students’ study habits in Iranian Universities of Medical Sciences
Background. due to the role of correct habits in students’ academic progress, this study is aimed at evaluateing students’ study habits in Iranian medical universities. Material and methods. Data collection method in this study was a systematic review and meta-analysis based on searches for articles published on reputable Iranian and international sites for words such as “study habits,” “students,” “University of Medical Sciences,” and “Iran”; it was conducted without any time limit. It used a standard questionnaire of 45 study habits by Palsane and Sharma (PSSHI). Also, in the dataj analysis, computer software R version 3.6.3 was used to estimate the average score of students’ study habits. Results. In the present study, 13 articles were reviewed, as a result of which 2,665 students who were studying at one of the Iranian medical universities from 2006 to 2018 were assessed. The overall score for students’ study habits was 49.03 out of a maximum score of 90. Similarly, eight areas of students’ study habits were calculated separately: time allocated was 5.61 out of a maximum score of 10; physical conditions was 6.94 out of a maximum score of 12; reading capability was 14.8 out of a maximum score of 16; note-taking was 3.17 out of a maximum score of 6; learning motivation was 6.93 out of a maximum score of 12; memory was 4.61 out of a maximum score of 8; taking exams was 9.92 out of a maximum score of 20; and health was 3.23 out of a maximum score of 6. Conclusions. The overall score of the students’ study habits was moderate and the score for “taking exams” was the weakest. Consequently, bearing in mind that these areas of study are related to people’s health, it is probable that these students will have study habits that are better and higher than average; the Ministry of Health, Treatment and Medical Education of Iran should consider this point. Medical universities can assess their students’ study habits before they enroll in the university, and if necessary, improve these habits by performing some educational interventions, such as organizing training courses, and using mobile educational applications, etc.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
14.30%
发文量
18
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The significance of awareness about iron deficiency anaemia in its prevention among Iraqi pregnant women attending primary healthcare centres Pattern of platelet indices in hypertension: a single-centre experience for a primary care setting Association of mental health and medication adherence with blood pressure control in primary care patients with hypertension: a cross-sectional study Violence against women with hearing disabilities in Tabuk, Saudi Arabia Patient satisfaction and health system responsiveness among attendants to family health centres and units affiliated with universal health insurance in Port Said Governorate
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1