遥感地表温度反演方法的比较研究

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2013-01-25 DOI:10.5589/m13-008
A. Benmecheta, A. Abdellaoui, A. Hamou
{"title":"遥感地表温度反演方法的比较研究","authors":"A. Benmecheta, A. Abdellaoui, A. Hamou","doi":"10.5589/m13-008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main purpose of this paper is to describe, compare, and analyze the various extraction methods for land surface temperature (LST) in terms of their computational algorithms, their different input parameters, and their relative accuracy to make them more readily usable by a broader cross-section of nontechnical practitioners. Due to the heterogeneity of most natural land surfaces, the atmospheric influence, and a wide variety of satellite sensors, the estimation and validation of LST can be difficult. Furthermore, the large number of algorithms developed to deal with this heterogeneity has led to widespread confusion on how and when to use one algorithm versus another. This paper provides a concise, but thorough, overview of the different algorithms used for the estimation of land surface temperature as well as a comparative list of methods and associated parameters that facilitate, to the general user, the selection and application of the most appropriate method for LST extraction given the situation at hand. We restricted our analysis for the single-channel algorithms to two models. We included a two-channel algorithm (or split-window when it is applied in the region 10–12.5 µm) according to the literature. The Temperature Emissivity Separation algorithm was also taken into account. The determination of the key parameters needed to execute these algorithms is presented.","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5589/m13-008","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative study of land surface temperature retrieval methods from remote sensing data\",\"authors\":\"A. Benmecheta, A. Abdellaoui, A. Hamou\",\"doi\":\"10.5589/m13-008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The main purpose of this paper is to describe, compare, and analyze the various extraction methods for land surface temperature (LST) in terms of their computational algorithms, their different input parameters, and their relative accuracy to make them more readily usable by a broader cross-section of nontechnical practitioners. Due to the heterogeneity of most natural land surfaces, the atmospheric influence, and a wide variety of satellite sensors, the estimation and validation of LST can be difficult. Furthermore, the large number of algorithms developed to deal with this heterogeneity has led to widespread confusion on how and when to use one algorithm versus another. This paper provides a concise, but thorough, overview of the different algorithms used for the estimation of land surface temperature as well as a comparative list of methods and associated parameters that facilitate, to the general user, the selection and application of the most appropriate method for LST extraction given the situation at hand. We restricted our analysis for the single-channel algorithms to two models. We included a two-channel algorithm (or split-window when it is applied in the region 10–12.5 µm) according to the literature. The Temperature Emissivity Separation algorithm was also taken into account. The determination of the key parameters needed to execute these algorithms is presented.\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5589/m13-008\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5589/m13-008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5589/m13-008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

摘要

本文的主要目的是描述、比较和分析陆地表面温度(LST)的各种提取方法,包括它们的计算算法、不同的输入参数和相对精度,以使它们更容易被更广泛的非技术从业人员使用。由于大多数自然地表的异质性、大气影响和各种卫星传感器,估算和验证地表温度可能很困难。此外,为处理这种异质性而开发的大量算法导致了如何以及何时使用一种算法与另一种算法的广泛混淆。本文简要而全面地概述了用于估算地表温度的不同算法,并提供了一份方法和相关参数的比较列表,以方便一般用户在给定的情况下选择和应用最合适的地表温度提取方法。我们将单通道算法的分析限制为两个模型。根据文献,我们包括了一个双通道算法(或拆分窗口,当它应用于10-12.5µm区域时)。同时考虑了温度发射率分离算法。给出了执行这些算法所需的关键参数的确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A comparative study of land surface temperature retrieval methods from remote sensing data
The main purpose of this paper is to describe, compare, and analyze the various extraction methods for land surface temperature (LST) in terms of their computational algorithms, their different input parameters, and their relative accuracy to make them more readily usable by a broader cross-section of nontechnical practitioners. Due to the heterogeneity of most natural land surfaces, the atmospheric influence, and a wide variety of satellite sensors, the estimation and validation of LST can be difficult. Furthermore, the large number of algorithms developed to deal with this heterogeneity has led to widespread confusion on how and when to use one algorithm versus another. This paper provides a concise, but thorough, overview of the different algorithms used for the estimation of land surface temperature as well as a comparative list of methods and associated parameters that facilitate, to the general user, the selection and application of the most appropriate method for LST extraction given the situation at hand. We restricted our analysis for the single-channel algorithms to two models. We included a two-channel algorithm (or split-window when it is applied in the region 10–12.5 µm) according to the literature. The Temperature Emissivity Separation algorithm was also taken into account. The determination of the key parameters needed to execute these algorithms is presented.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
Similarities and differences between chronic primary pain and depression in brain activities: Evidence from resting-state microstates and auditory Oddball task. A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1