{"title":"文化民主:艺术、社区和公共目的","authors":"Lisa L. Higgins, Teresa K. Hollingsworth","doi":"10.5860/choice.43-1645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cultural Democracy: The Arts, Community, and the Public Purpose. By James Bau Graves. (Champaign: University of Illinois Press, 2005. Pp. xii + 256, acknowledgments, introduction, photographs, charts, table, notes, bibliography, index. $45.00 cloth, $20.00 paper); Federalizing the Muse: United States Arts Policy and the National Endowment for the Arts, 1965-1980. By Donna M. Binkiewicz. (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2004. Pp. xii + 295, acknowledgments, introduction, photographs, table, notes, bibliography, index. $59.95 cloth, $24.95 paper) Both of these titles should be added to the folk-arts administrator's reading list, and both should be included in syllabi for public-sector folklore courses. We advise the same for arts administrators and arts-administration curricula. These two volumes provide historical context and useful insight into funding mechanisms and program development. In the first volume, Cultural Democracy (the term is defined here as \"social agenda\"), James Bau Graves provides a view of the evolution of this movement in the United States, its relationship to corporate America-and its potential global impact. He offers strong arguments for the economic benefits of cultural democracy and the sustainability of traditional culture. He explores the conflicts and blessings of corporate and foundation funding in addition to addressing the impact of America's political agenda and private sector sphere on the rest of the world. An ethnomusicologist and the director of the Center for Cultural Exchange in Portland, Maine, Graves draws extensively from his own experience working with immigrant communities over twenty years. Because he readily admits his own foibles in establishing relationships and developing projects within ethnic communities, Graves presents the reader with honest assessments of his own work as a self-described \"cultural mediator.\" Most of his examples are reflective of his work with new immigrant communities, with less attention paid to tradition bearers from African American and Anglo American communities. In fact, he usually writes of cultural democracy as it relates exclusively to minority communities. Graves weaves chapters addressing subjects as broad as education, economics and globalization into thought-provoking discussions about the conflict between an implied greater good and corporate power. Chapter one, \"Communion,\" is essential reading for arts administrators who truly strive to involve local communities in arts planning. The most useful portion of the book is chapter seven, \"Mediation\"; here Graves introduces ten specific, insightful examples for cultural mediators to employ when working in collaboration with communities. Throughout, he offers suggestions for implementation often with projected, sometimes lofty, outcomes. Although he cites impressive and extensive research from a number of sources, Graves relies too heavily on the theories of economic-development specialist Richard Florida. However, Graves' own research is thorough and he uses information from a variety of perspectives including arts educators, academic and public sector folklorists, and journalists. Other resources include publications from the federal government (National Endowment for the Arts) and various funding organizations. In the second volume, Federalizing the Muse, Donna M. Binkiewicz traces the history of the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) from its precursors to the present, though her emphasis is primarily on the Endowment's first fifteen years. …","PeriodicalId":44624,"journal":{"name":"WESTERN FOLKLORE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2005-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cultural Democracy: The Arts, Community, and the Public Purpose\",\"authors\":\"Lisa L. Higgins, Teresa K. Hollingsworth\",\"doi\":\"10.5860/choice.43-1645\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cultural Democracy: The Arts, Community, and the Public Purpose. By James Bau Graves. (Champaign: University of Illinois Press, 2005. Pp. xii + 256, acknowledgments, introduction, photographs, charts, table, notes, bibliography, index. $45.00 cloth, $20.00 paper); Federalizing the Muse: United States Arts Policy and the National Endowment for the Arts, 1965-1980. By Donna M. Binkiewicz. (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2004. Pp. xii + 295, acknowledgments, introduction, photographs, table, notes, bibliography, index. $59.95 cloth, $24.95 paper) Both of these titles should be added to the folk-arts administrator's reading list, and both should be included in syllabi for public-sector folklore courses. We advise the same for arts administrators and arts-administration curricula. These two volumes provide historical context and useful insight into funding mechanisms and program development. In the first volume, Cultural Democracy (the term is defined here as \\\"social agenda\\\"), James Bau Graves provides a view of the evolution of this movement in the United States, its relationship to corporate America-and its potential global impact. He offers strong arguments for the economic benefits of cultural democracy and the sustainability of traditional culture. He explores the conflicts and blessings of corporate and foundation funding in addition to addressing the impact of America's political agenda and private sector sphere on the rest of the world. An ethnomusicologist and the director of the Center for Cultural Exchange in Portland, Maine, Graves draws extensively from his own experience working with immigrant communities over twenty years. Because he readily admits his own foibles in establishing relationships and developing projects within ethnic communities, Graves presents the reader with honest assessments of his own work as a self-described \\\"cultural mediator.\\\" Most of his examples are reflective of his work with new immigrant communities, with less attention paid to tradition bearers from African American and Anglo American communities. In fact, he usually writes of cultural democracy as it relates exclusively to minority communities. Graves weaves chapters addressing subjects as broad as education, economics and globalization into thought-provoking discussions about the conflict between an implied greater good and corporate power. Chapter one, \\\"Communion,\\\" is essential reading for arts administrators who truly strive to involve local communities in arts planning. The most useful portion of the book is chapter seven, \\\"Mediation\\\"; here Graves introduces ten specific, insightful examples for cultural mediators to employ when working in collaboration with communities. Throughout, he offers suggestions for implementation often with projected, sometimes lofty, outcomes. Although he cites impressive and extensive research from a number of sources, Graves relies too heavily on the theories of economic-development specialist Richard Florida. However, Graves' own research is thorough and he uses information from a variety of perspectives including arts educators, academic and public sector folklorists, and journalists. Other resources include publications from the federal government (National Endowment for the Arts) and various funding organizations. In the second volume, Federalizing the Muse, Donna M. Binkiewicz traces the history of the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) from its precursors to the present, though her emphasis is primarily on the Endowment's first fifteen years. …\",\"PeriodicalId\":44624,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"WESTERN FOLKLORE\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"WESTERN FOLKLORE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.43-1645\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"FOLKLORE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WESTERN FOLKLORE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.43-1645","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FOLKLORE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13
摘要
文化民主:艺术、社区和公共目的。詹姆斯·鲍·格雷夫斯著。(香槟:伊利诺伊大学出版社,2005。第xii + 256页,致谢、引言、照片、图表、表格、注释、参考书目、索引。布$45.00,纸$20.00);《缪斯的联邦化:美国艺术政策与国家艺术基金会,1965-1980》。唐娜·m·宾凯维奇著。教堂山:北卡罗来纳大学出版社,2004年。第xii + 295页,致谢、引言、照片、表格、注释、参考书目、索引。布59.95美元,纸24.95美元)这两本书都应该被列入民间艺术管理员的阅读清单,而且都应该被列入公共部门民俗学课程的教学大纲。我们对艺术管理人员和艺术管理课程也提出同样的建议。这两卷书提供了历史背景和对资助机制和项目发展的有用见解。在第一卷《文化民主》(此处定义为“社会议程”)中,詹姆斯·鲍·格雷夫斯阐述了这一运动在美国的演变、它与美国企业的关系以及它潜在的全球影响。他为文化民主的经济效益和传统文化的可持续性提供了强有力的论据。除了探讨美国政治议程和私营领域对世界其他地区的影响外,他还探讨了企业和基金会资金的冲突和好处。格雷夫斯是一名民族音乐学家,也是缅因州波特兰市文化交流中心的主任,他从自己20多年来在移民社区工作的经历中汲取了大量的经验。因为格雷夫斯乐于承认自己在建立关系和发展种族社区项目方面的缺点,他以一个自称“文化调解人”的身份向读者展示了他对自己作品的诚实评价。他的大多数例子都反映了他与新移民社区的合作,而对非裔美国人和盎格鲁美国人社区的传统承担者关注较少。事实上,他通常写文化民主,因为它只与少数群体有关。格雷夫斯将涉及教育、经济和全球化等广泛主题的章节编织成发人深省的讨论,探讨隐含的更大利益与企业权力之间的冲突。第一章“交流”是那些真正努力让当地社区参与艺术规划的艺术管理人员的必读读物。这本书最有用的部分是第七章“调解”;在这里,格雷夫斯介绍了十个具体的、有见地的例子,供文化调解员在与社区合作时使用。自始至终,他都提出了一些实施建议,这些建议通常带有预期的、有时是崇高的结果。尽管格雷夫斯引用了许多来源的令人印象深刻的广泛研究,但他过于依赖经济发展专家理查德·佛罗里达的理论。然而,格雷夫斯自己的研究是彻底的,他使用了各种角度的信息,包括艺术教育家,学术和公共部门民俗学家,以及记者。其他资源包括来自联邦政府(国家艺术基金会)和各种资助组织的出版物。在第二卷《缪斯的联邦化》中,唐娜·m·宾凯维奇(Donna M. Binkiewicz)追溯了美国国家艺术基金会(National Endowment for the Arts,简称NEA)从其前身到现在的历史,尽管她的重点主要放在该基金会的前15年。…
Cultural Democracy: The Arts, Community, and the Public Purpose
Cultural Democracy: The Arts, Community, and the Public Purpose. By James Bau Graves. (Champaign: University of Illinois Press, 2005. Pp. xii + 256, acknowledgments, introduction, photographs, charts, table, notes, bibliography, index. $45.00 cloth, $20.00 paper); Federalizing the Muse: United States Arts Policy and the National Endowment for the Arts, 1965-1980. By Donna M. Binkiewicz. (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2004. Pp. xii + 295, acknowledgments, introduction, photographs, table, notes, bibliography, index. $59.95 cloth, $24.95 paper) Both of these titles should be added to the folk-arts administrator's reading list, and both should be included in syllabi for public-sector folklore courses. We advise the same for arts administrators and arts-administration curricula. These two volumes provide historical context and useful insight into funding mechanisms and program development. In the first volume, Cultural Democracy (the term is defined here as "social agenda"), James Bau Graves provides a view of the evolution of this movement in the United States, its relationship to corporate America-and its potential global impact. He offers strong arguments for the economic benefits of cultural democracy and the sustainability of traditional culture. He explores the conflicts and blessings of corporate and foundation funding in addition to addressing the impact of America's political agenda and private sector sphere on the rest of the world. An ethnomusicologist and the director of the Center for Cultural Exchange in Portland, Maine, Graves draws extensively from his own experience working with immigrant communities over twenty years. Because he readily admits his own foibles in establishing relationships and developing projects within ethnic communities, Graves presents the reader with honest assessments of his own work as a self-described "cultural mediator." Most of his examples are reflective of his work with new immigrant communities, with less attention paid to tradition bearers from African American and Anglo American communities. In fact, he usually writes of cultural democracy as it relates exclusively to minority communities. Graves weaves chapters addressing subjects as broad as education, economics and globalization into thought-provoking discussions about the conflict between an implied greater good and corporate power. Chapter one, "Communion," is essential reading for arts administrators who truly strive to involve local communities in arts planning. The most useful portion of the book is chapter seven, "Mediation"; here Graves introduces ten specific, insightful examples for cultural mediators to employ when working in collaboration with communities. Throughout, he offers suggestions for implementation often with projected, sometimes lofty, outcomes. Although he cites impressive and extensive research from a number of sources, Graves relies too heavily on the theories of economic-development specialist Richard Florida. However, Graves' own research is thorough and he uses information from a variety of perspectives including arts educators, academic and public sector folklorists, and journalists. Other resources include publications from the federal government (National Endowment for the Arts) and various funding organizations. In the second volume, Federalizing the Muse, Donna M. Binkiewicz traces the history of the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) from its precursors to the present, though her emphasis is primarily on the Endowment's first fifteen years. …