印尼16-24岁人群直接卵形角测量的性别估计

Q4 Dentistry Journal of Stomatology Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.5114/jos.2022.114501
Raudin Ghazani, D. Adespin, R. Saputri, R. Boedi
{"title":"印尼16-24岁人群直接卵形角测量的性别估计","authors":"Raudin Ghazani, D. Adespin, R. Saputri, R. Boedi","doi":"10.5114/jos.2022.114501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Sex determination an important role in post-mortem (PM) profile reconstruction, which enables to reduce the possibility of identification. Gonial angle (GA) of mandible is a reliable sex parameter through skeletal examination. However, given frequent limited resources in forensic setting, direct GA measurement approach on deceased’s body is more practicable. Objectives: This study aims to evaluate GA discriminative ability in sex estimation by using direct measurement method in 16-24 years old Indonesian population. Material and methods: One hundred individuals (M = 43, F = 57) between 16-24 years old from Jepara District, Central Java, Indonesia, were selected for the measurement of both left (LGA) and right (RGA) gonial angle using a goniometer. Inter-and intra-observer reliability were 0.906 and 0.936, respectively, after one month using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC). Measured LGA and RGA from males and females were compared using Mann-Whitney U -test, and Pearson’s correlation between LGA and RGA were calculated. Binary logistic regression and ROC curve models were applied to analyze GA capability in sex discrimination. Results: There was no significant difference between LGA and RGA measurements, and a high correlation was detected ( r = 0.73). Both LGA and RGA had significant value to predict sex. AUC value of LGA was 0.615 ( p = 0.048; 95% CI: 0.51-0.73) and RGA was 0.637 ( p = 0.015; 95% CI: 0.53-0.74). Conclusions: The proposed direct examination method of GA to predict sex shows a low discriminating performance on both LGA and RGA variables.","PeriodicalId":35469,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stomatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sex estimation using direct gonial angle measurement in 16-24 years old Indonesian population\",\"authors\":\"Raudin Ghazani, D. Adespin, R. Saputri, R. Boedi\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/jos.2022.114501\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Sex determination an important role in post-mortem (PM) profile reconstruction, which enables to reduce the possibility of identification. Gonial angle (GA) of mandible is a reliable sex parameter through skeletal examination. However, given frequent limited resources in forensic setting, direct GA measurement approach on deceased’s body is more practicable. Objectives: This study aims to evaluate GA discriminative ability in sex estimation by using direct measurement method in 16-24 years old Indonesian population. Material and methods: One hundred individuals (M = 43, F = 57) between 16-24 years old from Jepara District, Central Java, Indonesia, were selected for the measurement of both left (LGA) and right (RGA) gonial angle using a goniometer. Inter-and intra-observer reliability were 0.906 and 0.936, respectively, after one month using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC). Measured LGA and RGA from males and females were compared using Mann-Whitney U -test, and Pearson’s correlation between LGA and RGA were calculated. Binary logistic regression and ROC curve models were applied to analyze GA capability in sex discrimination. Results: There was no significant difference between LGA and RGA measurements, and a high correlation was detected ( r = 0.73). Both LGA and RGA had significant value to predict sex. AUC value of LGA was 0.615 ( p = 0.048; 95% CI: 0.51-0.73) and RGA was 0.637 ( p = 0.015; 95% CI: 0.53-0.74). Conclusions: The proposed direct examination method of GA to predict sex shows a low discriminating performance on both LGA and RGA variables.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35469,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Stomatology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Stomatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/jos.2022.114501\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stomatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/jos.2022.114501","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:性别鉴定在尸检(PM)剖面重建中起着重要作用,可以减少鉴定的可能性。下颌骨角(GA)是一个可靠的骨性指标。然而,由于法医环境中资源有限,直接测量死者尸体的遗传算法更为可行。目的:采用直接测量法对印尼16 ~ 24岁人群的遗传算法在性别估计中的判别能力进行评价。材料和方法:选取印度尼西亚中爪哇Jepara地区16-24岁的100人(M = 43, F = 57),用测角仪测量左(LGA)和右(RGA)角。使用类内相关系数(ICC),一个月后观察者间和观察者内信度分别为0.906和0.936。采用Mann-Whitney U检验比较男性和女性测量的LGA和RGA,并计算LGA和RGA之间的Pearson相关性。采用二元逻辑回归和ROC曲线模型分析遗传算法在性别歧视中的应用能力。结果:LGA与RGA测量值无显著性差异,相关性高(r = 0.73)。LGA和RGA对性别预测均有显著价值。LGA的AUC值为0.615 (p = 0.048;95% CI: 0.51-0.73), RGA为0.637 (p = 0.015;95% ci: 0.53-0.74)。结论:本文提出的遗传算法预测性别的直接检验方法对LGA和RGA变量的判别性能较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sex estimation using direct gonial angle measurement in 16-24 years old Indonesian population
Introduction: Sex determination an important role in post-mortem (PM) profile reconstruction, which enables to reduce the possibility of identification. Gonial angle (GA) of mandible is a reliable sex parameter through skeletal examination. However, given frequent limited resources in forensic setting, direct GA measurement approach on deceased’s body is more practicable. Objectives: This study aims to evaluate GA discriminative ability in sex estimation by using direct measurement method in 16-24 years old Indonesian population. Material and methods: One hundred individuals (M = 43, F = 57) between 16-24 years old from Jepara District, Central Java, Indonesia, were selected for the measurement of both left (LGA) and right (RGA) gonial angle using a goniometer. Inter-and intra-observer reliability were 0.906 and 0.936, respectively, after one month using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC). Measured LGA and RGA from males and females were compared using Mann-Whitney U -test, and Pearson’s correlation between LGA and RGA were calculated. Binary logistic regression and ROC curve models were applied to analyze GA capability in sex discrimination. Results: There was no significant difference between LGA and RGA measurements, and a high correlation was detected ( r = 0.73). Both LGA and RGA had significant value to predict sex. AUC value of LGA was 0.615 ( p = 0.048; 95% CI: 0.51-0.73) and RGA was 0.637 ( p = 0.015; 95% CI: 0.53-0.74). Conclusions: The proposed direct examination method of GA to predict sex shows a low discriminating performance on both LGA and RGA variables.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Stomatology
Journal of Stomatology Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
Role of nanotechnology in dentistry: a systematic review Investigation of cyto-toxicity of an innovative BIOfactor MTA product in different human cells: a pilot study Effectiveness of four home oral care products for primary enamel re-mineralization with early carious lesion: an in-vitro study Evaluation of bio-compatibility and effectiveness of propolis Tetragonula sp. as dental anti-microbial agent Patient under anti-clotting therapy in dental office – management, procedures, and complications: a survey research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1