暗房:1950年以来南非的摄影和新媒体

IF 0.3 4区 历史学 Q2 HISTORY INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AFRICAN HISTORICAL STUDIES Pub Date : 2011-01-01 DOI:10.5860/choice.48-0089
J. Mason
{"title":"暗房:1950年以来南非的摄影和新媒体","authors":"J. Mason","doi":"10.5860/choice.48-0089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Darkroom: Photography and New Media in South Africa since 1950. By Tosha Grantham. Charlottesville and London: Virginia Museum of Fine Arts, 2009. Distributed by the University of Virginia Press. Pp. 160. $35.00 paper. When Tosha Grantham decided to curate \"a brief survey\" of South Africa's postwar photographic culture, she took on a daunting task. South Africa may be a relatively small country, but it has produced several distinct generations of photographers and visual artists, working in a variety of traditions. Deciding who to include in Darkroom: Photography and New Media in South Africa since 1950, the catalog and touring exhibition, and how to interpret their work presented challenges that Grantham only partly overcomes. The eighteen artists and photographers included in Darkroom represent a cross-section of practitioners- young and old, black and white, male and female. Some have long since established global reputations; others deserve wider recognition outside of South Africa. The book's weaknesses have to do with exclusion, rather than inclusion. Too many important photographers and photographic movements have been left out, and that prevents Darkroom from being the overview it aspires to be. The roots of the problem are both practical and theoretical. First, over a third of the plates in the book (35 out of 110) are devoted to the work of just two men- David Goldblatt and Jurgen Schadeberg. This gives their output undue weight and occupies space that would have been better used by opening the door to more photographers. Second, the book misreads South African photography's history, constructing an implicit narrative of movement from documentary photography to fine art photography. This storyline rests on a sharp but unsustainable dichotomy between documentary practice and art, a point to which I shall return. Whatever its weaknesses, Darkroom is full of superb photographs. The deeply saturated color portraits of urban and urbanizing Africans that Sukhdeo Bobson Mohanlall made in the 1960s and 1970s will be a fascinating discovery, even for people who know something about South African photography. Nontsikelelo Veleko's contemporary portraits of young Johannesburg hipsters show how both South Africans' identities and photographic styles have become less local and more globalized. Readers get a tantalizing, but far too brief glimpse of Santu Mofokeng's \"Black Photo Album\" series, in which he has rephotographed and reimagined nineteenth- and early twentieth-century studio portraits of the black middle class. They will also want to see more of Sue Williamson's \"Better Lives\" project, a sensitive and angry response to recent outbreaks of xenophobia in South Africa. …","PeriodicalId":45676,"journal":{"name":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AFRICAN HISTORICAL STUDIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Darkroom: Photography and New Media in South Africa since 1950\",\"authors\":\"J. Mason\",\"doi\":\"10.5860/choice.48-0089\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Darkroom: Photography and New Media in South Africa since 1950. By Tosha Grantham. Charlottesville and London: Virginia Museum of Fine Arts, 2009. Distributed by the University of Virginia Press. Pp. 160. $35.00 paper. When Tosha Grantham decided to curate \\\"a brief survey\\\" of South Africa's postwar photographic culture, she took on a daunting task. South Africa may be a relatively small country, but it has produced several distinct generations of photographers and visual artists, working in a variety of traditions. Deciding who to include in Darkroom: Photography and New Media in South Africa since 1950, the catalog and touring exhibition, and how to interpret their work presented challenges that Grantham only partly overcomes. The eighteen artists and photographers included in Darkroom represent a cross-section of practitioners- young and old, black and white, male and female. Some have long since established global reputations; others deserve wider recognition outside of South Africa. The book's weaknesses have to do with exclusion, rather than inclusion. Too many important photographers and photographic movements have been left out, and that prevents Darkroom from being the overview it aspires to be. The roots of the problem are both practical and theoretical. First, over a third of the plates in the book (35 out of 110) are devoted to the work of just two men- David Goldblatt and Jurgen Schadeberg. This gives their output undue weight and occupies space that would have been better used by opening the door to more photographers. Second, the book misreads South African photography's history, constructing an implicit narrative of movement from documentary photography to fine art photography. This storyline rests on a sharp but unsustainable dichotomy between documentary practice and art, a point to which I shall return. Whatever its weaknesses, Darkroom is full of superb photographs. The deeply saturated color portraits of urban and urbanizing Africans that Sukhdeo Bobson Mohanlall made in the 1960s and 1970s will be a fascinating discovery, even for people who know something about South African photography. Nontsikelelo Veleko's contemporary portraits of young Johannesburg hipsters show how both South Africans' identities and photographic styles have become less local and more globalized. Readers get a tantalizing, but far too brief glimpse of Santu Mofokeng's \\\"Black Photo Album\\\" series, in which he has rephotographed and reimagined nineteenth- and early twentieth-century studio portraits of the black middle class. They will also want to see more of Sue Williamson's \\\"Better Lives\\\" project, a sensitive and angry response to recent outbreaks of xenophobia in South Africa. …\",\"PeriodicalId\":45676,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AFRICAN HISTORICAL STUDIES\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AFRICAN HISTORICAL STUDIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.48-0089\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AFRICAN HISTORICAL STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.48-0089","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

暗房:1950年以来南非的摄影和新媒体。托莎·格兰瑟姆著。夏洛茨维尔和伦敦:弗吉尼亚美术博物馆,2009年。由弗吉尼亚大学出版社发行。160页。35.00美元。当托莎·格兰瑟姆(Tosha Grantham)决定策划一项关于南非战后摄影文化的“简短调查”时,她承担了一项艰巨的任务。南非可能是一个相对较小的国家,但它产生了几代不同的摄影师和视觉艺术家,他们以各种不同的传统工作。决定在《暗房:1950年以来南非的摄影和新媒体》中收录谁,以及如何解读他们的作品,这些都是格兰瑟姆只能部分克服的挑战。《暗房》中的十八位艺术家和摄影师代表了从业人员的横截面——年轻人和老年人,黑人和白人,男性和女性。有些人早就建立了全球声誉;其他人应该在南非以外得到更广泛的认可。这本书的缺点在于排斥,而不是包容。太多重要的摄影师和摄影运动被遗漏了,这阻碍了《暗房》成为它渴望成为的总览。问题的根源既有现实的,也有理论的。首先,书中超过三分之一的板块(110个板块中的35个)都是两个人的作品——大卫·戈德布拉特和于尔根·沙德伯格。这给他们的作品增加了不必要的重量,占用了本来可以更好地利用的空间,为更多的摄影师敞开大门。其次,本书误读了南非摄影的历史,构建了一种从纪实摄影到美术摄影的含蓄叙事。这个故事情节建立在纪录片实践和艺术之间尖锐但不可持续的二分法上,我将回到这一点。无论它的缺点是什么,暗室都充满了出色的照片。Sukhdeo Bobson Mohanlall在20世纪60年代和70年代拍摄的非洲城市和城市化的深度饱和彩色肖像将是一个迷人的发现,即使对那些对南非摄影有所了解的人来说也是如此。Nontsikelelo Veleko对约翰内斯堡年轻潮人的当代肖像展示了南非人的身份和摄影风格是如何变得不那么本土化而更加全球化的。Santu Mofokeng的“黑人照相簿”系列吸引读者的目光,但太短暂了,他在其中重新拍摄和重新想象了19世纪和20世纪初黑人中产阶级的工作室肖像。他们还希望更多地了解苏·威廉姆森的“更好的生活”项目,这是对最近南非爆发的仇外情绪的敏感而愤怒的回应。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Darkroom: Photography and New Media in South Africa since 1950
Darkroom: Photography and New Media in South Africa since 1950. By Tosha Grantham. Charlottesville and London: Virginia Museum of Fine Arts, 2009. Distributed by the University of Virginia Press. Pp. 160. $35.00 paper. When Tosha Grantham decided to curate "a brief survey" of South Africa's postwar photographic culture, she took on a daunting task. South Africa may be a relatively small country, but it has produced several distinct generations of photographers and visual artists, working in a variety of traditions. Deciding who to include in Darkroom: Photography and New Media in South Africa since 1950, the catalog and touring exhibition, and how to interpret their work presented challenges that Grantham only partly overcomes. The eighteen artists and photographers included in Darkroom represent a cross-section of practitioners- young and old, black and white, male and female. Some have long since established global reputations; others deserve wider recognition outside of South Africa. The book's weaknesses have to do with exclusion, rather than inclusion. Too many important photographers and photographic movements have been left out, and that prevents Darkroom from being the overview it aspires to be. The roots of the problem are both practical and theoretical. First, over a third of the plates in the book (35 out of 110) are devoted to the work of just two men- David Goldblatt and Jurgen Schadeberg. This gives their output undue weight and occupies space that would have been better used by opening the door to more photographers. Second, the book misreads South African photography's history, constructing an implicit narrative of movement from documentary photography to fine art photography. This storyline rests on a sharp but unsustainable dichotomy between documentary practice and art, a point to which I shall return. Whatever its weaknesses, Darkroom is full of superb photographs. The deeply saturated color portraits of urban and urbanizing Africans that Sukhdeo Bobson Mohanlall made in the 1960s and 1970s will be a fascinating discovery, even for people who know something about South African photography. Nontsikelelo Veleko's contemporary portraits of young Johannesburg hipsters show how both South Africans' identities and photographic styles have become less local and more globalized. Readers get a tantalizing, but far too brief glimpse of Santu Mofokeng's "Black Photo Album" series, in which he has rephotographed and reimagined nineteenth- and early twentieth-century studio portraits of the black middle class. They will also want to see more of Sue Williamson's "Better Lives" project, a sensitive and angry response to recent outbreaks of xenophobia in South Africa. …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The International Journal of African Historical Studies (IJAHS) is devoted to the study of the African past. Norman Bennett was the founder and guiding force behind the journal’s growth from its first incarnation at Boston University as African Historical Studies in 1968. He remained its editor for more than thirty years. The title was expanded to the International Journal of African Historical Studies in 1972, when Africana Publishers Holmes and Meier took over publication and distribution for the next decade. Beginning in 1982, the African Studies Center once again assumed full responsibility for production and distribution. Jean Hay served as the journal’s production editor from 1979 to 1995, and editor from 1998 to her retirement in 2005. Michael DiBlasi is the current editor, and James McCann and Diana Wylie are associate editors of the journal. Members of the editorial board include: Emmanuel Akyeampong, Peter Alegi, Misty Bastian, Sara Berry, Barbara Cooper, Marc Epprecht, Lidwien Kapteijns, Meredith McKittrick, Pashington Obang, David Schoenbrun, Heather Sharkey, Ann B. Stahl, John Thornton, and Rudolph Ware III. The journal publishes three issues each year (April, August, and December). Articles, notes, and documents submitted to the journal should be based on original research and framed in terms of historical analysis. Contributions in archaeology, history, anthropology, historical ecology, political science, political ecology, and economic history are welcome. Articles that highlight European administrators, settlers, or colonial policies should be submitted elsewhere, unless they deal substantially with interactions with (or the affects on) African societies.
期刊最新文献
Democratization of Information in West Africa: Exploring a New Form of Mobile Journalism Challenging the ‘Western’ Narrative: Africa and the Migration Crisis Ideational Imperatives of Political Development in Africa: Lessons for India and Other Post-Colonial Societies Digital Communication and Techno-Politics: Populist Framing and Hypermedia in West African Context and Beyond "Democratization in Africa and Its Challenges "
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1