{"title":"谁赢了?预测武装冲突中的战略成败","authors":"T. Mahnken, J. Levy","doi":"10.5860/choice.51-4707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"P atricia L. Sullivan’s Who Wins? seeks to understand why strong states so often are unable to achieve their aims in wars against weaker adversaries. She demonstrates that the reason rests not merely with the belligerents’ resolve or their strategic choices, but rather with the nature of the political objectives they pursue. In particular, she argues strong states are most likely to succeed when their aim is to seize territory from a weaker opponent or overthrow its regime. By contrast, victory is least likely to follow attempts to coerce a weaker adversary into changing its behavior.","PeriodicalId":35242,"journal":{"name":"Parameters","volume":"44 1","pages":"141-143"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Who Wins? Predicting Strategic Success and Failure in Armed Conflict\",\"authors\":\"T. Mahnken, J. Levy\",\"doi\":\"10.5860/choice.51-4707\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"P atricia L. Sullivan’s Who Wins? seeks to understand why strong states so often are unable to achieve their aims in wars against weaker adversaries. She demonstrates that the reason rests not merely with the belligerents’ resolve or their strategic choices, but rather with the nature of the political objectives they pursue. In particular, she argues strong states are most likely to succeed when their aim is to seize territory from a weaker opponent or overthrow its regime. By contrast, victory is least likely to follow attempts to coerce a weaker adversary into changing its behavior.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35242,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Parameters\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"141-143\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"23\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Parameters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.51-4707\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Parameters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.51-4707","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23
摘要
P .阿特里夏·l·沙利文的《谁赢了?》试图理解为什么强国经常无法在与弱小对手的战争中实现其目标。她指出,原因不仅在于交战双方的决心或战略选择,还在于他们所追求的政治目标的性质。她特别指出,当强国的目标是从较弱的对手手中夺取领土或推翻其政权时,它们最有可能取得成功。相比之下,试图强迫弱小的对手改变其行为是最不可能取得胜利的。
Who Wins? Predicting Strategic Success and Failure in Armed Conflict
P atricia L. Sullivan’s Who Wins? seeks to understand why strong states so often are unable to achieve their aims in wars against weaker adversaries. She demonstrates that the reason rests not merely with the belligerents’ resolve or their strategic choices, but rather with the nature of the political objectives they pursue. In particular, she argues strong states are most likely to succeed when their aim is to seize territory from a weaker opponent or overthrow its regime. By contrast, victory is least likely to follow attempts to coerce a weaker adversary into changing its behavior.