健康图书馆员的社交媒体

Pub Date : 2010-08-01 DOI:10.5596/C10-019
D. Giustini
{"title":"健康图书馆员的社交媒体","authors":"D. Giustini","doi":"10.5596/C10-019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Welcome to a new information technology column called ‘‘Social media for health librarians’’ for the JCHLA/ JABSC. Over the next year or so, I plan to write about social media and the effects of Web 2.0 tools on our information practices. I hope you find the column a more casual read (i.e., less academic) than previous teaching and learning columns. My goal is to engage health librarians about the tools and trends of Web 2.0 and to raise topics for debate with your peers. Feel free to engage me in debate also. E-mail your questions and send suggested topics such as medicine 2.0, health 2.0, or even health librarian 2.0. For now, let’s leave all of the Web 2-point-ohs for later. (See Appendix A for quick definitions of these terms.) Let’s begin by talking about time — what other health librarians tell me is the single largest barrier to their use of social media. As a health librarian who follows social media very closely, I realize that time is a significant barrier for many of you and that these barriers also prevent appropriate evaluation of tools. I also realize that if it comes down to spending your collections budgets or evaluating Twitter, there is no contest — collections come first. But Twitter’s rise in particular reminds me of the hoopla around Google Scholar when it was first released; do you recall how many librarians spoke out against using it [1–2]? Would any of us now deny that Google Scholar is extremely valuable in the health librarian’s toolkit, indeed any librarian’s toolkit? The realization that Twitter, like Google Scholar, is valuable is certain to come with time. Social networking presents its own quirks for health librarians — and a tendency to drain more of our time. And the ruse is that to use social media well, you need to build a network of people to create the network effect. The network effect (Metcalfe’s law) states that the more people you have in your network, the more useful it becomes [3]. On Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn, I follow ,1000 people. I can’t follow all of these people closely but am getting to know about 5% of my network. I follow people from around the world and anyone who can teach me something. If someone is not providing value to me, I quietly stop following them. I am regularly asked how I monitor so many social tools while maintaining a full-time position at the UBC Biomedical Branch Library. How do I find time to evaluate the tools? I’m also asked what my opinion is on social media’s long-term prospects. Is social networking a passing fad? And even — as a busy academic health librarian at Vancouver General Hospital, why do I blog and tweet? For me, social media is primarily about two things: lifelong learning and promoting the profession. I firmly believe health librarians should be thinking about the implications of social media in the information age but also using it to tell our stories. Moreover, I think social media is a natural ally for lifelong learners. My use of social media directs my learning every day, and I see it as part of understanding the digital landscape. Our information practices in the digital age should take into account core librarianship competencies but within an environment that includes social media. Many of you already use social media and collaborate with users online. Please share your ideas. You might even author blogs or use Twitter to network with colleagues. In 2010, it is obvious we have reached a critical mass of social media users in CHLA / ABSC [4]. The Association Web site is now interactive and several members contribute to the Board blog — maybe not as regularly as I would like, but it’s a start. In the same way that Google is now accepted, social media has reached a level of quiet acceptance by information professionals. Have you discerned the slow shift towards the acceptance of social media in health libraries? Within the Medical Library Association (MLA), librarians work through modules to learn about social media [5]. While tools such as Twitter and Second Life may be peripheral for a while, other tools seem to be here to stay. Take a look at some of the recent social media research in MEDLINE; recently, I noticed that several well-designed studies have been published [6–15]. Clinicians around the world are evaluating social media, and the evidence-base is growing. Social media represents a new domain of expertise for health librarians. Are the collaboration and informationsharing skills of Web 2.0 critical for our future? I believe that they are. Social media skills are not as important as maintaining our intellectual orientation or the work we do to organize collections and services. But I believe we","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2010-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social media for health librarians\",\"authors\":\"D. Giustini\",\"doi\":\"10.5596/C10-019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Welcome to a new information technology column called ‘‘Social media for health librarians’’ for the JCHLA/ JABSC. Over the next year or so, I plan to write about social media and the effects of Web 2.0 tools on our information practices. I hope you find the column a more casual read (i.e., less academic) than previous teaching and learning columns. My goal is to engage health librarians about the tools and trends of Web 2.0 and to raise topics for debate with your peers. Feel free to engage me in debate also. E-mail your questions and send suggested topics such as medicine 2.0, health 2.0, or even health librarian 2.0. For now, let’s leave all of the Web 2-point-ohs for later. (See Appendix A for quick definitions of these terms.) Let’s begin by talking about time — what other health librarians tell me is the single largest barrier to their use of social media. As a health librarian who follows social media very closely, I realize that time is a significant barrier for many of you and that these barriers also prevent appropriate evaluation of tools. I also realize that if it comes down to spending your collections budgets or evaluating Twitter, there is no contest — collections come first. But Twitter’s rise in particular reminds me of the hoopla around Google Scholar when it was first released; do you recall how many librarians spoke out against using it [1–2]? Would any of us now deny that Google Scholar is extremely valuable in the health librarian’s toolkit, indeed any librarian’s toolkit? The realization that Twitter, like Google Scholar, is valuable is certain to come with time. Social networking presents its own quirks for health librarians — and a tendency to drain more of our time. And the ruse is that to use social media well, you need to build a network of people to create the network effect. The network effect (Metcalfe’s law) states that the more people you have in your network, the more useful it becomes [3]. On Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn, I follow ,1000 people. I can’t follow all of these people closely but am getting to know about 5% of my network. I follow people from around the world and anyone who can teach me something. If someone is not providing value to me, I quietly stop following them. I am regularly asked how I monitor so many social tools while maintaining a full-time position at the UBC Biomedical Branch Library. How do I find time to evaluate the tools? I’m also asked what my opinion is on social media’s long-term prospects. Is social networking a passing fad? And even — as a busy academic health librarian at Vancouver General Hospital, why do I blog and tweet? For me, social media is primarily about two things: lifelong learning and promoting the profession. I firmly believe health librarians should be thinking about the implications of social media in the information age but also using it to tell our stories. Moreover, I think social media is a natural ally for lifelong learners. My use of social media directs my learning every day, and I see it as part of understanding the digital landscape. Our information practices in the digital age should take into account core librarianship competencies but within an environment that includes social media. Many of you already use social media and collaborate with users online. Please share your ideas. You might even author blogs or use Twitter to network with colleagues. In 2010, it is obvious we have reached a critical mass of social media users in CHLA / ABSC [4]. The Association Web site is now interactive and several members contribute to the Board blog — maybe not as regularly as I would like, but it’s a start. In the same way that Google is now accepted, social media has reached a level of quiet acceptance by information professionals. Have you discerned the slow shift towards the acceptance of social media in health libraries? Within the Medical Library Association (MLA), librarians work through modules to learn about social media [5]. While tools such as Twitter and Second Life may be peripheral for a while, other tools seem to be here to stay. Take a look at some of the recent social media research in MEDLINE; recently, I noticed that several well-designed studies have been published [6–15]. Clinicians around the world are evaluating social media, and the evidence-base is growing. Social media represents a new domain of expertise for health librarians. Are the collaboration and informationsharing skills of Web 2.0 critical for our future? I believe that they are. Social media skills are not as important as maintaining our intellectual orientation or the work we do to organize collections and services. But I believe we\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5596/C10-019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5596/C10-019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

欢迎来到JCHLA/ JABSC的新信息技术专栏“健康图书馆员的社会媒体”。在接下来的一年左右,我计划写一些关于社会媒体和Web 2.0工具对我们信息实践的影响的文章。我希望你觉得这个专栏比以前的教学和学习专栏更随意(也就是说,不那么学术性)。我的目标是让健康图书馆员了解Web 2.0的工具和趋势,并提出与同行讨论的话题。你也可以和我辩论。通过电子邮件发送您的问题,并发送建议主题,如医学2.0、健康2.0,甚至健康图书管理员2.0。现在,让我们把所有的Web 2.0放到以后讨论。(参见附录A对这些术语的快速定义。)让我们从时间开始——其他健康图书管理员告诉我的是他们使用社交媒体的最大障碍。作为一名密切关注社交媒体的健康图书管理员,我意识到时间对你们中的许多人来说是一个重要的障碍,这些障碍也阻碍了对工具的适当评估。我也意识到,如果要花费你的收藏预算或评估Twitter,这是没有竞争的——收藏是第一位的。但Twitter的崛起尤其让我想起谷歌Scholar刚发布时的喧嚣;你还记得有多少图书管理员反对使用它吗[1-2]?我们中有谁会否认b谷歌Scholar在健康图书管理员的工具包中是非常有价值的,实际上是任何图书管理员的工具包?随着时间的推移,人们肯定会意识到Twitter和谷歌Scholar一样是有价值的。对健康图书管理员来说,社交网络有其自身的怪癖——而且有消耗我们更多时间的趋势。其中的策略是,要想很好地使用社交媒体,你需要建立一个人际网络来创造网络效应。网络效应(梅特卡夫定律)表明,你的网络中人越多,它就越有用。在Twitter、Facebook和LinkedIn上,我关注了1000个人。我不能密切关注所有这些人,但我正在了解我的网络中大约5%的人。我跟随来自世界各地的人以及任何能教我东西的人。如果有人不能为我提供价值,我就悄悄地不再追随他们。经常有人问我,在UBC生物医学分馆保持全职工作的同时,我是如何监控这么多社交工具的。我如何找到时间来评估这些工具?我还被问到对社交媒体的长期前景有何看法。社交网络只是昙花一现吗?甚至——作为温哥华总医院忙碌的学术健康图书管理员,我为什么要写博客和推特呢?对我来说,社交媒体主要是关于两件事:终身学习和促进职业发展。我坚信,健康图书馆员应该思考信息时代社交媒体的影响,但也要利用它来讲述我们的故事。此外,我认为社交媒体是终身学习者的天然盟友。我每天都在使用社交媒体指导我的学习,我认为这是理解数字世界的一部分。我们在数字时代的信息实践应该考虑图书馆的核心能力,但要在包括社交媒体在内的环境中。你们中的许多人已经在使用社交媒体,并在网上与用户合作。请分享你的想法。你甚至可以写博客或使用Twitter与同事交流。在2010年,很明显我们已经在CHLA / ABSC b[4]达到了一个临界数量的社交媒体用户。协会的网站现在是互动式的,有几个成员在理事会的博客上发表文章——也许不像我希望的那样经常,但这是一个开始。就像b谷歌现在被接受一样,社交媒体已经在一定程度上被信息专业人士悄悄接受。你是否注意到卫生图书馆接受社交媒体的缓慢转变?在医学图书馆协会(MLA)内,图书馆员通过模块学习社会媒体[5]。虽然像Twitter和Second Life这样的工具在一段时间内可能是次要的,但其他工具似乎会继续存在。看看MEDLINE上最近的一些社会媒体研究;最近,我注意到一些精心设计的研究已经发表[6-15]。世界各地的临床医生都在评估社交媒体,证据基础也在不断增加。社交媒体代表了卫生图书馆员的一个新的专业领域。Web 2.0的协作和信息共享技能对我们的未来至关重要吗?我相信他们是。社交媒体技能不如保持我们的智力取向或我们组织收藏和服务的工作重要。但我相信我们
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
Social media for health librarians
Welcome to a new information technology column called ‘‘Social media for health librarians’’ for the JCHLA/ JABSC. Over the next year or so, I plan to write about social media and the effects of Web 2.0 tools on our information practices. I hope you find the column a more casual read (i.e., less academic) than previous teaching and learning columns. My goal is to engage health librarians about the tools and trends of Web 2.0 and to raise topics for debate with your peers. Feel free to engage me in debate also. E-mail your questions and send suggested topics such as medicine 2.0, health 2.0, or even health librarian 2.0. For now, let’s leave all of the Web 2-point-ohs for later. (See Appendix A for quick definitions of these terms.) Let’s begin by talking about time — what other health librarians tell me is the single largest barrier to their use of social media. As a health librarian who follows social media very closely, I realize that time is a significant barrier for many of you and that these barriers also prevent appropriate evaluation of tools. I also realize that if it comes down to spending your collections budgets or evaluating Twitter, there is no contest — collections come first. But Twitter’s rise in particular reminds me of the hoopla around Google Scholar when it was first released; do you recall how many librarians spoke out against using it [1–2]? Would any of us now deny that Google Scholar is extremely valuable in the health librarian’s toolkit, indeed any librarian’s toolkit? The realization that Twitter, like Google Scholar, is valuable is certain to come with time. Social networking presents its own quirks for health librarians — and a tendency to drain more of our time. And the ruse is that to use social media well, you need to build a network of people to create the network effect. The network effect (Metcalfe’s law) states that the more people you have in your network, the more useful it becomes [3]. On Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn, I follow ,1000 people. I can’t follow all of these people closely but am getting to know about 5% of my network. I follow people from around the world and anyone who can teach me something. If someone is not providing value to me, I quietly stop following them. I am regularly asked how I monitor so many social tools while maintaining a full-time position at the UBC Biomedical Branch Library. How do I find time to evaluate the tools? I’m also asked what my opinion is on social media’s long-term prospects. Is social networking a passing fad? And even — as a busy academic health librarian at Vancouver General Hospital, why do I blog and tweet? For me, social media is primarily about two things: lifelong learning and promoting the profession. I firmly believe health librarians should be thinking about the implications of social media in the information age but also using it to tell our stories. Moreover, I think social media is a natural ally for lifelong learners. My use of social media directs my learning every day, and I see it as part of understanding the digital landscape. Our information practices in the digital age should take into account core librarianship competencies but within an environment that includes social media. Many of you already use social media and collaborate with users online. Please share your ideas. You might even author blogs or use Twitter to network with colleagues. In 2010, it is obvious we have reached a critical mass of social media users in CHLA / ABSC [4]. The Association Web site is now interactive and several members contribute to the Board blog — maybe not as regularly as I would like, but it’s a start. In the same way that Google is now accepted, social media has reached a level of quiet acceptance by information professionals. Have you discerned the slow shift towards the acceptance of social media in health libraries? Within the Medical Library Association (MLA), librarians work through modules to learn about social media [5]. While tools such as Twitter and Second Life may be peripheral for a while, other tools seem to be here to stay. Take a look at some of the recent social media research in MEDLINE; recently, I noticed that several well-designed studies have been published [6–15]. Clinicians around the world are evaluating social media, and the evidence-base is growing. Social media represents a new domain of expertise for health librarians. Are the collaboration and informationsharing skills of Web 2.0 critical for our future? I believe that they are. Social media skills are not as important as maintaining our intellectual orientation or the work we do to organize collections and services. But I believe we
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1