B. Orhan, G. Sönmez, Mehmet Ozgur Ozemre, C. K. Secgin, K. Kamburoğlu, A. Gulsahi
{"title":"不同变量对种植体周围边缘骨丢失的影响","authors":"B. Orhan, G. Sönmez, Mehmet Ozgur Ozemre, C. K. Secgin, K. Kamburoğlu, A. Gulsahi","doi":"10.7727/wimj.2018.068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To assess the effects of different variables including implant type and thread design, bone width and height measured on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images, along with systemic and patient related factors on marginal bone loss around dental implants which were measured on postoperative panoramic radiographs. Methods: A total of 116 dental implants from two manufacturers were used in the study. Age, gender, history of diabetes mellitus and hypertension, smoking habit, implant thread type, implant site, length and diameter were recorded. Available alveolar bone width and height were measured on preoperative CBCT images. Marginal bone loss around dental implants was measured on the panoramic radiographs taken three months after implant placement on both mesial and distal sides. Results: There were no statistically significant differences for the measurements of marginal bone loss on both distal and mesial sides according to gender, region, jaw and implant type. While there was a significant difference between patients with and without diabetes mellitus in terms of distal marginal bone loss (p < 0.05); no significant difference was found between patients with and without diabetes mellitus for mesial marginal bone loss. The mean of marginal bone loss was 1.43 ± 0.75 mm and 1.45 ± 0.75 at the distal and mesial sides, respectively. We found statistically significant differences for alveolar width and marginal bone loss. However, no significant differences were found for the height measurements. Conclusion: Marginal bone loss increased with an increase in bone width. There were no significant differences for the measurements of marginal bone loss on both distal and mesial sides according to gender, region, jaw, and implant type.","PeriodicalId":49366,"journal":{"name":"West Indian Medical Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effects of Different Variables on Marginal Bone Loss around Dental Implants\",\"authors\":\"B. Orhan, G. Sönmez, Mehmet Ozgur Ozemre, C. K. Secgin, K. Kamburoğlu, A. Gulsahi\",\"doi\":\"10.7727/wimj.2018.068\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To assess the effects of different variables including implant type and thread design, bone width and height measured on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images, along with systemic and patient related factors on marginal bone loss around dental implants which were measured on postoperative panoramic radiographs. Methods: A total of 116 dental implants from two manufacturers were used in the study. Age, gender, history of diabetes mellitus and hypertension, smoking habit, implant thread type, implant site, length and diameter were recorded. Available alveolar bone width and height were measured on preoperative CBCT images. Marginal bone loss around dental implants was measured on the panoramic radiographs taken three months after implant placement on both mesial and distal sides. Results: There were no statistically significant differences for the measurements of marginal bone loss on both distal and mesial sides according to gender, region, jaw and implant type. While there was a significant difference between patients with and without diabetes mellitus in terms of distal marginal bone loss (p < 0.05); no significant difference was found between patients with and without diabetes mellitus for mesial marginal bone loss. The mean of marginal bone loss was 1.43 ± 0.75 mm and 1.45 ± 0.75 at the distal and mesial sides, respectively. We found statistically significant differences for alveolar width and marginal bone loss. However, no significant differences were found for the height measurements. Conclusion: Marginal bone loss increased with an increase in bone width. There were no significant differences for the measurements of marginal bone loss on both distal and mesial sides according to gender, region, jaw, and implant type.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49366,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"West Indian Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"West Indian Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7727/wimj.2018.068\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"West Indian Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7727/wimj.2018.068","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Effects of Different Variables on Marginal Bone Loss around Dental Implants
Objective: To assess the effects of different variables including implant type and thread design, bone width and height measured on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images, along with systemic and patient related factors on marginal bone loss around dental implants which were measured on postoperative panoramic radiographs. Methods: A total of 116 dental implants from two manufacturers were used in the study. Age, gender, history of diabetes mellitus and hypertension, smoking habit, implant thread type, implant site, length and diameter were recorded. Available alveolar bone width and height were measured on preoperative CBCT images. Marginal bone loss around dental implants was measured on the panoramic radiographs taken three months after implant placement on both mesial and distal sides. Results: There were no statistically significant differences for the measurements of marginal bone loss on both distal and mesial sides according to gender, region, jaw and implant type. While there was a significant difference between patients with and without diabetes mellitus in terms of distal marginal bone loss (p < 0.05); no significant difference was found between patients with and without diabetes mellitus for mesial marginal bone loss. The mean of marginal bone loss was 1.43 ± 0.75 mm and 1.45 ± 0.75 at the distal and mesial sides, respectively. We found statistically significant differences for alveolar width and marginal bone loss. However, no significant differences were found for the height measurements. Conclusion: Marginal bone loss increased with an increase in bone width. There were no significant differences for the measurements of marginal bone loss on both distal and mesial sides according to gender, region, jaw, and implant type.
期刊介绍:
The Journal is international in scope, with author and editorial contributions from across the globe. The focus is on clinical and epidemiological aspects of tropical and infectious diseases, new and re-emerging infections, chronic non-communicable diseases, and medical conditions prevalent in the Latin America-Caribbean region, and of significance to global health, especially in developing countries. The Journal covers all medical disciplines, as well as basic and translational research elucidating the pathophysiologic basis of diseases or focussing on new therapeutic approaches, and publishes original scientific research, reviews, case reports, brief communications, letters, commentaries and medical images. The Journal publishes four to six issues and four supplements annually. English is the language of publication but Abstracts are also duplicated in Spanish. Most of the articles are submitted at the authors’ initiative, but some are solicited by the Editor-in-Chief. Unless expressly stated, the Editorial Board does not accept responsibility for authors’ opinions.
All papers on submission are reviewed by a subcommittee. Those deemed worthy for review are sent to two or three reviewers (one of the three might be a statistician if necessary). The returned papers with reviewer comments are reviewed by the Editor-in-Chief. Papers may be rejected, accepted or sent back to authors for revision. Resubmitted papers from authors are reviewed by the Editor-in-Chief and may be sent back to reviewers or a final decision made by Editor-in-Chief. The decision of the Editorial Board is final with regards to rejected articles. Rejected articles will not be returned to the authors. The editorial subcommittee has the right to return sub-standard manuscripts to the authors, rather than passing them on to the reviewers. This implies outright rejection of the manuscript.