家庭用水处理和安全储存——既有效又经济

S.M.L. Stubbé, A. Pelgrim-Adams, G. Szántó, D. Halem
{"title":"家庭用水处理和安全储存——既有效又经济","authors":"S.M.L. Stubbé, A. Pelgrim-Adams, G. Szántó, D. Halem","doi":"10.5194/DWES-9-9-2016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Household Water Treatment and safe Storage (HWTS) systems aim to provide safe drinking water in an affordable manner to users where safe piped water supply is either not feasible or not reliable. In this study the effectiveness, economic parameters and costs of three selected HWTS systems were identified. The selected systems are SODIS, ceramic filter and biosand filter. These options were selected based on their accessibility, affordability and available scientific data. Data was obtained through peer-reviewed literature, reports, web-pages and informal sources. The findings show a wide dispersion for log removal of effectiveness of the HWTS systems. For bacteria (E. coli), log removals of 1–9 (SODIS), 0.5–7.2 (ceramic) and 0–3 (biosand) were reported. In the case of viruses (mostly echovirus and bacteriophages), log removals of 0–4.3 (SODIS), 0.09–2.4 (ceramic) and 0–7 (biosand) were found. The dispersions of log removals for both bacteria and viruses range from non-protective to highly protective according to WHO performance targets. The reported costs of HWTS systems show a wide range as well. The price per cubic meter water is found to be EUR 0–8 (SODIS), EUR 0.37–6.4 (ceramic) and EUR 0.08–12.3 (biosand). The retail prices found are: negligible (SODIS), USD 1.9–30 (ceramic) and USD 7–100 (biosand). No relationship was observed between removal efficiency and economics of the three systems.","PeriodicalId":53581,"journal":{"name":"Drinking Water Engineering and Science","volume":"9 1","pages":"9-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Household water treatment and safe storage – effectiveness and economics\",\"authors\":\"S.M.L. Stubbé, A. Pelgrim-Adams, G. Szántó, D. Halem\",\"doi\":\"10.5194/DWES-9-9-2016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract. Household Water Treatment and safe Storage (HWTS) systems aim to provide safe drinking water in an affordable manner to users where safe piped water supply is either not feasible or not reliable. In this study the effectiveness, economic parameters and costs of three selected HWTS systems were identified. The selected systems are SODIS, ceramic filter and biosand filter. These options were selected based on their accessibility, affordability and available scientific data. Data was obtained through peer-reviewed literature, reports, web-pages and informal sources. The findings show a wide dispersion for log removal of effectiveness of the HWTS systems. For bacteria (E. coli), log removals of 1–9 (SODIS), 0.5–7.2 (ceramic) and 0–3 (biosand) were reported. In the case of viruses (mostly echovirus and bacteriophages), log removals of 0–4.3 (SODIS), 0.09–2.4 (ceramic) and 0–7 (biosand) were found. The dispersions of log removals for both bacteria and viruses range from non-protective to highly protective according to WHO performance targets. The reported costs of HWTS systems show a wide range as well. The price per cubic meter water is found to be EUR 0–8 (SODIS), EUR 0.37–6.4 (ceramic) and EUR 0.08–12.3 (biosand). The retail prices found are: negligible (SODIS), USD 1.9–30 (ceramic) and USD 7–100 (biosand). No relationship was observed between removal efficiency and economics of the three systems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53581,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drinking Water Engineering and Science\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"9-18\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-08-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drinking Water Engineering and Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5194/DWES-9-9-2016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drinking Water Engineering and Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/DWES-9-9-2016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

摘要家庭水处理和安全储存(HWTS)系统旨在以负担得起的方式向无法或不可靠地获得安全管道供水的用户提供安全饮用水。在本研究中,确定了三个选定的HWTS系统的有效性、经济参数和成本。所选择的系统是SODIS,陶瓷过滤器和生物砂过滤器。这些方案是根据其可及性、可负担性和现有科学数据选择的。数据是通过同行评审的文献、报告、网页和非正式来源获得的。研究结果表明,HWTS系统的测井去除效果存在很大的差异。据报道,细菌(大肠杆菌)的去除率为1-9 (SODIS), 0.5-7.2(陶瓷)和0-3(生物沙)。在病毒(主要是埃可病毒和噬菌体)的情况下,发现对数去除率为0-4.3 (SODIS), 0.09-2.4(陶瓷)和0-7(生物沙)。根据世卫组织绩效目标,清除细菌和病毒的原木的分散范围从无保护性到高度保护性不等。报告的HWTS系统成本也显示出很大的差异。每立方米水的价格分别为 0-8欧元(SODIS)、 0.37-6.4欧元(陶瓷)和 0.08-12.3欧元(生物沙)。发现的零售价格是:可以忽略不计(SODIS), 1.9-30美元(陶瓷)和 7-100美元(生物沙)。三种体系的去除效率与经济性之间没有关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Household water treatment and safe storage – effectiveness and economics
Abstract. Household Water Treatment and safe Storage (HWTS) systems aim to provide safe drinking water in an affordable manner to users where safe piped water supply is either not feasible or not reliable. In this study the effectiveness, economic parameters and costs of three selected HWTS systems were identified. The selected systems are SODIS, ceramic filter and biosand filter. These options were selected based on their accessibility, affordability and available scientific data. Data was obtained through peer-reviewed literature, reports, web-pages and informal sources. The findings show a wide dispersion for log removal of effectiveness of the HWTS systems. For bacteria (E. coli), log removals of 1–9 (SODIS), 0.5–7.2 (ceramic) and 0–3 (biosand) were reported. In the case of viruses (mostly echovirus and bacteriophages), log removals of 0–4.3 (SODIS), 0.09–2.4 (ceramic) and 0–7 (biosand) were found. The dispersions of log removals for both bacteria and viruses range from non-protective to highly protective according to WHO performance targets. The reported costs of HWTS systems show a wide range as well. The price per cubic meter water is found to be EUR 0–8 (SODIS), EUR 0.37–6.4 (ceramic) and EUR 0.08–12.3 (biosand). The retail prices found are: negligible (SODIS), USD 1.9–30 (ceramic) and USD 7–100 (biosand). No relationship was observed between removal efficiency and economics of the three systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Drinking Water Engineering and Science
Drinking Water Engineering and Science Environmental Science-Water Science and Technology
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊最新文献
The evaluation of hydraulic reliability indices in water distribution networks under pipe failure conditions Technical note: Graph theory-based heuristics to aid in the implementation of optimized drinking water network sectorization Solar distillation of impure water from four different water sources under the southwestern Nigerian climate Sustainability characteristics of drinking water supply in the Netherlands Preparation of thin-film composite membranes supported with electrospun nanofibers for desalination by forward osmosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1