巴西国民教育指导方针和基础法的奥德赛(1945-1964)

IF 0.1 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Educacao Pub Date : 2021-01-31 DOI:10.5902/1984644438609
Alexandre Macedo Pereira, Margarete Von Muhlen Poll
{"title":"巴西国民教育指导方针和基础法的奥德赛(1945-1964)","authors":"Alexandre Macedo Pereira, Margarete Von Muhlen Poll","doi":"10.5902/1984644438609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nowadays Brazilian education has been attacked by the Federal Government on several fronts, such as: an attempt to disqualify teacher’s work and also education professionals, education budget cuts, a censorship attempt to academic and teaching freedom and so on. This work aims to a) show the Brazilian Education Guidelines and Framework Law’s trajectory between 1945 to 1964; b) expose the behind the scenes of the political dispute in the National Congress regarding the approval of Brazilian Education Guidelines and Framework in the period of 1945 to 1964; c) promote reflection about the political, ideological, economic relations and public education policies. As regards to methodology aspects, this research is bibliographic and documental, qualitative and exploratory. As theoretical support, we have used the works of Boris Fausto (2013), Thomas E. Skidmore (2010) e Evaldo Vieira (2015). In the field of History of Education, we have used the contributions of Dermeval Saviani (1998). Furthermore, as supplementary theoretical support, we have considered the works of Istvan Meszaros (2015), Steven Levitsky e Daniel Ziblatt (2018), among others. The research has shown that social and political groups quarreled over the control of Brazilian education for different reasons. Among divergences and convergences between those groups, the bill which determines the guidelines for Brazilian Education moved through the National Congress for sixteen years. We have concluded that it is necessary to reflect upon the paths we go through, the strategies we use, the partnerships we establish in order to face educational problems.","PeriodicalId":44306,"journal":{"name":"Educacao","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A odisseia da Lei de Diretrizes e Bases da Educação Nacional no Brasil (1945-1964)\",\"authors\":\"Alexandre Macedo Pereira, Margarete Von Muhlen Poll\",\"doi\":\"10.5902/1984644438609\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Nowadays Brazilian education has been attacked by the Federal Government on several fronts, such as: an attempt to disqualify teacher’s work and also education professionals, education budget cuts, a censorship attempt to academic and teaching freedom and so on. This work aims to a) show the Brazilian Education Guidelines and Framework Law’s trajectory between 1945 to 1964; b) expose the behind the scenes of the political dispute in the National Congress regarding the approval of Brazilian Education Guidelines and Framework in the period of 1945 to 1964; c) promote reflection about the political, ideological, economic relations and public education policies. As regards to methodology aspects, this research is bibliographic and documental, qualitative and exploratory. As theoretical support, we have used the works of Boris Fausto (2013), Thomas E. Skidmore (2010) e Evaldo Vieira (2015). In the field of History of Education, we have used the contributions of Dermeval Saviani (1998). Furthermore, as supplementary theoretical support, we have considered the works of Istvan Meszaros (2015), Steven Levitsky e Daniel Ziblatt (2018), among others. The research has shown that social and political groups quarreled over the control of Brazilian education for different reasons. Among divergences and convergences between those groups, the bill which determines the guidelines for Brazilian Education moved through the National Congress for sixteen years. We have concluded that it is necessary to reflect upon the paths we go through, the strategies we use, the partnerships we establish in order to face educational problems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44306,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Educacao\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Educacao\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5902/1984644438609\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educacao","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5902/1984644438609","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

如今,巴西教育受到联邦政府在几个方面的攻击,例如:试图取消教师和教育专业人员的工作资格,削减教育预算,审查学术和教学自由的企图等等。这项工作旨在a)展示1945年至1964年间巴西教育指导方针和框架法的发展轨迹;b)揭露1945年至1964年期间国民议会关于批准巴西教育指导方针和框架的政治争端的幕后;C)促进对政治、意识形态、经济关系和公共教育政策的反思。在方法论方面,本研究是书目和文献,定性和探索性。作为理论支持,我们使用了Boris Fausto (2013), Thomas e . Skidmore(2010)和Evaldo Vieira(2015)的作品。在教育史领域,我们使用了Dermeval Saviani(1998)的贡献。此外,作为补充理论支持,我们考虑了Istvan Meszaros (2015), Steven Levitsky和Daniel Ziblatt(2018)等人的作品。研究表明,社会和政治团体出于不同的原因争夺巴西教育的控制权。在这些群体之间的分歧和趋同中,确定巴西教育指导方针的法案在国民议会中进行了16年。我们的结论是,有必要反思我们走过的道路,我们使用的策略,我们建立的伙伴关系,以面对教育问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A odisseia da Lei de Diretrizes e Bases da Educação Nacional no Brasil (1945-1964)
Nowadays Brazilian education has been attacked by the Federal Government on several fronts, such as: an attempt to disqualify teacher’s work and also education professionals, education budget cuts, a censorship attempt to academic and teaching freedom and so on. This work aims to a) show the Brazilian Education Guidelines and Framework Law’s trajectory between 1945 to 1964; b) expose the behind the scenes of the political dispute in the National Congress regarding the approval of Brazilian Education Guidelines and Framework in the period of 1945 to 1964; c) promote reflection about the political, ideological, economic relations and public education policies. As regards to methodology aspects, this research is bibliographic and documental, qualitative and exploratory. As theoretical support, we have used the works of Boris Fausto (2013), Thomas E. Skidmore (2010) e Evaldo Vieira (2015). In the field of History of Education, we have used the contributions of Dermeval Saviani (1998). Furthermore, as supplementary theoretical support, we have considered the works of Istvan Meszaros (2015), Steven Levitsky e Daniel Ziblatt (2018), among others. The research has shown that social and political groups quarreled over the control of Brazilian education for different reasons. Among divergences and convergences between those groups, the bill which determines the guidelines for Brazilian Education moved through the National Congress for sixteen years. We have concluded that it is necessary to reflect upon the paths we go through, the strategies we use, the partnerships we establish in order to face educational problems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Educacao
Educacao EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
98
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
A construção dos relatórios dos estágios supervisionados nas licenciaturas: indagações e desafios da experiência docente-discente Práticas digitais, sexualidade e educação numa escola pública de ensino fundamental Som, luzes, câmera, audiodescrição: modos de audiodescrever em sala de aula Pensamento pedagógico-geográfico de professor e a autonomia docente O discurso da comodificação da Educação na relação universidade acadêmica e universidade corporativa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1