全球化背景下的企业社会责任:基督徒高管该怎么做?

IF 0.4 Q4 ETHICS BUSINESS & PROFESSIONAL ETHICS JOURNAL Pub Date : 2004-11-01 DOI:10.5840/BPEJ200423410
Steven L. Rundle
{"title":"全球化背景下的企业社会责任:基督徒高管该怎么做?","authors":"Steven L. Rundle","doi":"10.5840/BPEJ200423410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several years ago John Houck and Oliver Williams (1996) produced a book entitled Is the Good Corporation Dead? It was prompted by the question of whether globalization is changing?or worse?eliminating, our modern sense of corporate social responsibility (CSR). As is often the case with edited compilations, there was a range of opinions expressed, both about what defines CSR and what should be done to save it. But if there was a common theme, it was that while the \"good\" corporation is not dead, it is certainly facing new challenges because of globalization. To this I would add that new opportunities for CSR are emerging as well. Globalization is expanding the reach of even the smallest businesses, and with that comes the capacity to do great harm or great good. The CSR debate more often emphasizes the former; this essay will focus on the latter. Anyone familiar with the CSR debate knows that the only real dif ference between the concerns being raised today?corporate obligations toward employees and other stakeholders, the ethics of outsourcing, down sizing, and so on?and those raised in past decades, is the global nature of today's marketplace. Where once the debate focused on the ethicality of, for example, outsourcing certain stages of the production process to low wage states like South Carolina or Mississippi, now the sharpest criticism is reserved for those who use overseas sources.","PeriodicalId":53983,"journal":{"name":"BUSINESS & PROFESSIONAL ETHICS JOURNAL","volume":"23 1","pages":"171-183"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2004-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Corporate Social Responsibility in a Globalizing World: What's a Christian Executive to Do?\",\"authors\":\"Steven L. Rundle\",\"doi\":\"10.5840/BPEJ200423410\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Several years ago John Houck and Oliver Williams (1996) produced a book entitled Is the Good Corporation Dead? It was prompted by the question of whether globalization is changing?or worse?eliminating, our modern sense of corporate social responsibility (CSR). As is often the case with edited compilations, there was a range of opinions expressed, both about what defines CSR and what should be done to save it. But if there was a common theme, it was that while the \\\"good\\\" corporation is not dead, it is certainly facing new challenges because of globalization. To this I would add that new opportunities for CSR are emerging as well. Globalization is expanding the reach of even the smallest businesses, and with that comes the capacity to do great harm or great good. The CSR debate more often emphasizes the former; this essay will focus on the latter. Anyone familiar with the CSR debate knows that the only real dif ference between the concerns being raised today?corporate obligations toward employees and other stakeholders, the ethics of outsourcing, down sizing, and so on?and those raised in past decades, is the global nature of today's marketplace. Where once the debate focused on the ethicality of, for example, outsourcing certain stages of the production process to low wage states like South Carolina or Mississippi, now the sharpest criticism is reserved for those who use overseas sources.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53983,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BUSINESS & PROFESSIONAL ETHICS JOURNAL\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"171-183\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BUSINESS & PROFESSIONAL ETHICS JOURNAL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5840/BPEJ200423410\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BUSINESS & PROFESSIONAL ETHICS JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/BPEJ200423410","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

几年前,约翰·霍克和奥利弗·威廉姆斯(1996)出版了一本名为《好公司死了吗?》它是由全球化是否正在改变的问题引发的?或者更糟?消除了我们现代的企业社会责任(CSR)。就像在编辑汇编中经常出现的情况一样,人们表达了各种各样的观点,包括如何定义CSR以及应该如何拯救它。但如果有一个共同的主题,那就是,虽然“好”公司没有死,但由于全球化,它肯定面临着新的挑战。对此,我想补充的是,企业社会责任的新机遇也正在出现。全球化正在扩大即使是最小的企业的影响范围,随之而来的是造成巨大伤害或巨大好处的能力。关于企业社会责任的争论更多地强调前者;本文将重点讨论后者。熟悉企业社会责任辩论的人都知道,今天提出的问题之间唯一真正的区别是什么?公司对员工和其他利益相关者的义务,外包的道德规范,缩减规模等等?而在过去几十年里提出的问题,是当今市场的全球化本质。曾经的争论集中在道德问题上,例如,将生产过程的某些阶段外包给南卡罗来纳或密西西比等低工资州,现在最尖锐的批评留给了那些使用海外资源的人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Corporate Social Responsibility in a Globalizing World: What's a Christian Executive to Do?
Several years ago John Houck and Oliver Williams (1996) produced a book entitled Is the Good Corporation Dead? It was prompted by the question of whether globalization is changing?or worse?eliminating, our modern sense of corporate social responsibility (CSR). As is often the case with edited compilations, there was a range of opinions expressed, both about what defines CSR and what should be done to save it. But if there was a common theme, it was that while the "good" corporation is not dead, it is certainly facing new challenges because of globalization. To this I would add that new opportunities for CSR are emerging as well. Globalization is expanding the reach of even the smallest businesses, and with that comes the capacity to do great harm or great good. The CSR debate more often emphasizes the former; this essay will focus on the latter. Anyone familiar with the CSR debate knows that the only real dif ference between the concerns being raised today?corporate obligations toward employees and other stakeholders, the ethics of outsourcing, down sizing, and so on?and those raised in past decades, is the global nature of today's marketplace. Where once the debate focused on the ethicality of, for example, outsourcing certain stages of the production process to low wage states like South Carolina or Mississippi, now the sharpest criticism is reserved for those who use overseas sources.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊最新文献
Autonomy and Subordination Applying Kant’s Ethics to Video Game Business Models A Necessary Ethics Definition for Conflicts of Interest Examining Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment as Motivators of Unethical Pro-Organizational Behavior Intolerable Ideologies and the Obligation to Discriminate
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1