基督教伦理决策的整合

IF 0.4 Q4 ETHICS BUSINESS & PROFESSIONAL ETHICS JOURNAL Pub Date : 2004-11-01 DOI:10.5840/BPEJ20042347
S. Jackson
{"title":"基督教伦理决策的整合","authors":"S. Jackson","doi":"10.5840/BPEJ20042347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Market complexity, ongoing change, and the effect of postmodern assump tions on capitalism leave organizational leaders to manage a degree of ambiguity historically unknown. In the midst of such ambiguity, leaders must respond to multiple constituents with competing demands (Fama, 1980), operating within structures that minimize the leaders' formal authority (e.g., Miles and Snow, 1986). The leaders' task, therefore, becomes the management of market and value ambiguity without formal influence, or at least with primarily informal influence (Kotter, 1985). It is in this ambiguous context that most organizational leaders are challenged with making and implementing ethical decisions (Donaldson, 2003). Overly simplistic assistance to leaders will not satisfy their complex needs. They require an integrated and appropriately sophisticated model for ethical decision-making. Christian leaders may require more, because they believe they are wrestling with truth in the midst of apparent chaos. Many promising advances are available to assist them, yet organizational efforts continue to strive for a more satisfactory integration. Given the overwhelming breadth and depth of ethical perspectives to date (Stackhouse, 1995), full and satisfactory integration is ultimately attainable only by God. However, we are called to the task of ongoing","PeriodicalId":53983,"journal":{"name":"BUSINESS & PROFESSIONAL ETHICS JOURNAL","volume":"23 1","pages":"115-133"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2004-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integration in Christian Ethical Decision-making\",\"authors\":\"S. Jackson\",\"doi\":\"10.5840/BPEJ20042347\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Market complexity, ongoing change, and the effect of postmodern assump tions on capitalism leave organizational leaders to manage a degree of ambiguity historically unknown. In the midst of such ambiguity, leaders must respond to multiple constituents with competing demands (Fama, 1980), operating within structures that minimize the leaders' formal authority (e.g., Miles and Snow, 1986). The leaders' task, therefore, becomes the management of market and value ambiguity without formal influence, or at least with primarily informal influence (Kotter, 1985). It is in this ambiguous context that most organizational leaders are challenged with making and implementing ethical decisions (Donaldson, 2003). Overly simplistic assistance to leaders will not satisfy their complex needs. They require an integrated and appropriately sophisticated model for ethical decision-making. Christian leaders may require more, because they believe they are wrestling with truth in the midst of apparent chaos. Many promising advances are available to assist them, yet organizational efforts continue to strive for a more satisfactory integration. Given the overwhelming breadth and depth of ethical perspectives to date (Stackhouse, 1995), full and satisfactory integration is ultimately attainable only by God. However, we are called to the task of ongoing\",\"PeriodicalId\":53983,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BUSINESS & PROFESSIONAL ETHICS JOURNAL\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"115-133\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BUSINESS & PROFESSIONAL ETHICS JOURNAL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5840/BPEJ20042347\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BUSINESS & PROFESSIONAL ETHICS JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/BPEJ20042347","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

市场的复杂性,持续的变化,以及后现代资本主义假设的影响,使得组织领导者需要管理一定程度的历史上未知的模糊性。在这种模棱两可的情况下,领导者必须对具有竞争性需求的多个组成部分做出反应(Fama, 1980),在最小化领导者正式权威的结构中运作(例如Miles和Snow, 1986)。因此,领导者的任务变成了在没有正式影响的情况下管理市场和价值模糊性,或者至少主要是非正式影响(Kotter, 1985)。正是在这种模棱两可的背景下,大多数组织领导者都面临着制定和实施道德决策的挑战(Donaldson, 2003)。对领导人过于简单的帮助无法满足他们复杂的需求。它们需要一个综合的、适当复杂的道德决策模型。基督教领袖可能需要更多,因为他们相信他们是在明显的混乱中与真理搏斗。许多有希望的进展可以帮助他们,但组织努力继续争取更令人满意的整合。鉴于迄今为止压倒性的伦理观点的广度和深度(斯塔克豪斯,1995),完全和令人满意的整合最终只能由上帝实现。然而,我们被要求继续进行这项任务
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Integration in Christian Ethical Decision-making
Market complexity, ongoing change, and the effect of postmodern assump tions on capitalism leave organizational leaders to manage a degree of ambiguity historically unknown. In the midst of such ambiguity, leaders must respond to multiple constituents with competing demands (Fama, 1980), operating within structures that minimize the leaders' formal authority (e.g., Miles and Snow, 1986). The leaders' task, therefore, becomes the management of market and value ambiguity without formal influence, or at least with primarily informal influence (Kotter, 1985). It is in this ambiguous context that most organizational leaders are challenged with making and implementing ethical decisions (Donaldson, 2003). Overly simplistic assistance to leaders will not satisfy their complex needs. They require an integrated and appropriately sophisticated model for ethical decision-making. Christian leaders may require more, because they believe they are wrestling with truth in the midst of apparent chaos. Many promising advances are available to assist them, yet organizational efforts continue to strive for a more satisfactory integration. Given the overwhelming breadth and depth of ethical perspectives to date (Stackhouse, 1995), full and satisfactory integration is ultimately attainable only by God. However, we are called to the task of ongoing
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊最新文献
Autonomy and Subordination Applying Kant’s Ethics to Video Game Business Models A Necessary Ethics Definition for Conflicts of Interest Examining Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment as Motivators of Unethical Pro-Organizational Behavior Intolerable Ideologies and the Obligation to Discriminate
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1